I added them but now that I think, it is a bad idea to have them as
fuzzing bots will find good seeds to tweak in order to find easy new
testcases which causes duplicated issues.
* hb_ot_layout_feature_get_characters
* hb_ot_layout_feature_get_name_ids
However HarfBuzz currently doesn't expose an API for retrieving the actual
information associated with NameId from the `name` table and that should be
done separately.
The font supports the deprecated tag 'DHV ' instead of 'DIV '. dv is
mapped to 'DIV ' and 'DHV ', in that order. The test specifies
`--language=dv`, demonstrating that if a font does not support the first
OpenType tag mapped to a BCP 47 tag, it will fall back to the next tag.
If the second subtag of a BCP 47 tag is three letters long, it denotes
an extended language. The tag converter ignores the language subtag and
uses the extended language instead.
There are some grandfathered exceptions, which are handled earlier.
The new script, gen-tag-table.py, generates `ot_languages` automatically
from the [OpenType language system tag registry][ot] and the [IANA
Language Subtag Registry][bcp47] with some manual modifications. If an
OpenType tag maps to a BCP 47 macrolanguage, all the macrolanguage's
individual languages are mapped to the same OpenType tag, except for
individual languages with their own OpenType mappings. Deprecated
BCP 47 tags are canonicalized.
[ot]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/languagetags
[bcp47]: https://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/language-subtag-registry
Some OpenType tags correspond to multiple ISO 639 codes. The mapping
from ISO 639 codes lists OpenType tags in priority order, such that more
specific or more likely tags appear first.
Some OpenType tags have no corresponding ISO 639 code in the registry so
their mappings use BCP 47 subtags besides the language. For example, any
BCP 47 tag with a fonipa variant subtag is mapped to 'IPPH', and 'IPPH'
is mapped back to und-fonipa.
Other OpenType tags have no corresponding ISO 639 code because it is not
clear what they are for. HarfBuzz just ignores these tags.
One such ignored tag is 'ZHP ' (Chinese Phonetic). It probably means
zh-Latn. However, it is used in Microsoft JhengHei and Microsoft YaHei
with the script tag 'hani', implying that it is not a romanization
scheme after all. It would be simple enough to add this mapping to
gen-tag-table.py once a definitive mapping is determined.
The manual modifications are mainly either obvious mappings that the
OpenType registry omits or mappings for compatibility with previous
versions of HarfBuzz. Some of the old mappings were discarded, though,
for homophonous language names. For example, OpenType maps 'KUI ' to
kxu; previous versions of HarfBuzz also mapped it to kvd, because kvd
and kxu both happen to be called "Kui".
gen-tag-table.py also generates a function to convert multi-subtag tags
like el-polyton and zh-HK to OpenType tags, replacing `ot_languages_zh`
and the hard-coded list of special cases in `hb_ot_tags_from_language`.
It also generates a function to convert OpenType tags to BCP 47,
replacing the hard-coded list of special cases in
`hb_ot_tag_to_language`.
The old hb-ot-tag.cc functions, `hb_ot_tags_from_script` and
`hb_ot_tag_from_language`, are now wrappers around a new function:
`hb_ot_tags`. It converts a script and a language to arrays of script
tags and language tags. This will make it easier to add new script tags
to scripts, like 'dev3'. It also allows for language fallback chains;
nothing produces more than one language yet though.
Where the old functions return the default tags 'DFLT' and 'dflt',
`hb_ot_tags` returns an empty array. The caller is responsible for
using the default tag in that case.
The new function also adds a new private use subtag syntax for script
overrides: "x-hbscabcd" requests a script tag of 'abcd'.
The old hb-ot-layout.cc functions,`hb_ot_layout_table_choose_script` and
`hb_ot_layout_script_find_language` are now wrappers around the new
functions `hb_ot_layout_table_select_script` and
`hb_ot_layout_script_select_language`. They are essentially the same as
the old ones plus a tag count parameter.
Closes#495.
Makes our FT-backed hb_font_t safe to use from multiple threads. Still,
the underlying FT_Face should NOT be used from other threads by client
or other libraries.
Maybe I add a lock()/unlock() public API ala PangoFT2 and cairo-ft.
Maybe not.
How come this one is not generated by clang everything bot?!
../../../test/api/test-multithread.c:37:26: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
static char *font_path = "fonts/Inconsolata-Regular.abc.ttf";
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../../test/api/test-multithread.c:38:21: warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
Now that we added morx support, our OS X bot is running them through CoreText
and failing (with a DoS / infinite loop no less!). Always run tests through
our own shaper.
Fixes https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues/1019
New numbers:
BENGALI: 353725 out of 354188 tests passed. 463 failed (0.130722%)
DEVANAGARI: 707261 out of 707394 tests passed. 133 failed (0.0188014%)
GUJARATI: 366353 out of 366457 tests passed. 104 failed (0.0283799%)
GURMUKHI: 60729 out of 60747 tests passed. 18 failed (0.0296311%)
KANNADA: 951300 out of 951913 tests passed. 613 failed (0.0643966%)
MALAYALAM: 1048136 out of 1048334 tests passed. 198 failed (0.0188871%)
ORIYA: 42327 out of 42329 tests passed. 2 failed (0.00472489%)
SINHALA: 271596 out of 271847 tests passed. 251 failed (0.0923313%)
TAMIL: 1091754 out of 1091754 tests passed. 0 failed (0%)
TELUGU: 970555 out of 970573 tests passed. 18 failed (0.00185457%)
Devanagari regressed because Uniscribe doesn't enforce the full set.
Tests added with the *-vowel-letters.txt files in tree and Noto fonts.
We might reintroduce it later, but for now remove, as it was unused.
Some things that should have been in this object (drop_hints, etc)
are already in hb_subset_input_t. So, for now, keep everything there.
Note that there's minor positioning differences, and ONE reordering
difference between what we get for these and what Uniscribe gets.
Probably same as what's described in commit message for
1a96cc825d
From the new code (first paragraph is from the OT Devanagari spec.):
/* o Reorder matras:
*
* If a pre-base matra character had been reordered before applying basic
* features, the glyph can be moved closer to the main consonant based on
* whether half-forms had been formed. Actual position for the matra is
* defined as “after last standalone halant glyph, after initial matra
* position and before the main consonant”. If ZWJ or ZWNJ follow this
* halant, position is moved after it.
*
* IMPLEMENTATION NOTES:
*
* It looks like the last sentence is wrong. Testing, with Windows 7 Uniscribe
* and Devanagari shows that the behavior is best described as:
*
* "If ZWJ follows this halant, matra is NOT repositioned after this halant.
* If ZWNJ follows this halant, position is moved after it."
*
* Test case, with Adobe Devanagari or Nirmala UI:
*
* U+091F,U+094D,U+200C,U+092F,U+093F
* (Matra moves to the middle, after ZWNJ.)
*
* U+091F,U+094D,U+200D,U+092F,U+093F
* (Matra does NOT move, stays to the left.)
Fixes https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues/1070
Test case added with Adobe Devanagari.
