Fix typos and mixup related to RSA_NO_CRT
This commit is contained in:
parent
5d42b53e51
commit
b82a5b554c
@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int rsa_check_context( mbedtls_rsa_context const *ctx, int is_priv )
|
||||
if( mbedtls_mpi_cmp_int( &ctx->E, 0 ) <= 0 )
|
||||
return( MBEDTLS_ERR_RSA_BAD_INPUT_DATA );
|
||||
|
||||
#if !defined(MBEDTLS_NO_CRT)
|
||||
#if defined(MBEDTLS_RSA_NO_CRT)
|
||||
/* For private key operations, use D or DP & DQ
|
||||
* as (unblinded) exponents. */
|
||||
if( is_priv && mbedtls_mpi_cmp_int( &ctx->D, 0 ) <= 0 )
|
||||
@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int rsa_check_context( mbedtls_rsa_context const *ctx, int is_priv )
|
||||
/* Blinding shouldn't make exponents negative either,
|
||||
* so check that P, Q >= 1 if that hasn't yet been
|
||||
* done as part of 1. */
|
||||
#if defined(MBEDTLS_NO_CRT)
|
||||
#if defined(MBEDTLS_RSA_NO_CRT)
|
||||
if( is_priv &&
|
||||
( mbedtls_mpi_cmp_int( &ctx->P, 0 ) <= 0 ||
|
||||
mbedtls_mpi_cmp_int( &ctx->Q, 0 ) <= 0 ) )
|
||||
@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static int rsa_check_context( mbedtls_rsa_context const *ctx, int is_priv )
|
||||
|
||||
/* It wouldn't lead to an error if it wasn't satisfied,
|
||||
* but check for PQ >= 1 nonetheless. */
|
||||
#if !defined(MBEDTLS_NO_CRT)
|
||||
#if !defined(MBEDTLS_RSA_NO_CRT)
|
||||
if( is_priv &&
|
||||
mbedtls_mpi_cmp_int( &ctx->QP, 0 ) <= 0 )
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user