If socket setup fail, ssl structure setup won't be called.
And the order of them do not affect final result, but it
will break ssl setup negative tests.
Change the order can fix that.
issue: #4844
Change-Id: I2488ed5f74773421eb1eac0cfd7f1ce4fbb0b32d
Signed-off-by: Jerry Yu <jerry.h.yu@arm.com>
To support tls1.3 relative tests, add `tls1_3`
parameter for `{min,max}_version` and `force_version`
issues: #4844
Change-Id: I1b22a076582374b8aabc733086562e9d03a94a2a
Signed-off-by: Jerry Yu <jerry.h.yu@arm.com>
Now that descriptions of error codes no longer have to be on the same line
for the sake of generate_errors.pl, move them to their own line before the
definition. This aligns them with what we do for other definitions, and
means that we no longer need to have very long lines containing both the C
definition and the comment.
```
perl -i -pe 's~^(#define +MBEDTLS_ERR_\w+ +-\w+) */\*[*!]<(.*)\*/~/**$2*/\n$1~' include/mbedtls/*.h
```
This commit does not change the output of generate_errors.pl.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
They were recognized by a prior commit. In this commit, replace line
breaks (with optional comment continuation marker) by spaces.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Before this commit, definitions of error codes must match a strict pattern,
with a Doxygen comment following the definition on the same line and
starting with "/**<". Change how generate_errors.pl so that the Doxygen
comment can be before the definition instead of after, and doesn't have to
be on the same line.
Also allow spaces between "#" and "define", and allow Doxygen comments to
start with "/*!" rather than "/**". Starting with "///" or "//!" is not
supported.
This commit does not change the output of generate_errors.pl.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Instances of `mbedtls_ssl_session` represent data enabling session resumption.
With the introduction of TLS 1.3, the format of this data changes. We therefore
need TLS-version field as part of `mbedtlsl_ssl_session` which allows distinguish
1.2 and 1.3 sessions.
This commit introduces such a TLS-version field to mbedtls_ssl_session.
The change has a few ramifications:
- Session serialization/deserialization routines need to be adjusted.
This is achieved by adding the TLS-version after the header of
Mbed TLS version+config, and by having the subsequent structure
of the serialized data depend on the value of this field.
The details are described in terms of the RFC 8446 presentation language.
The 1.2 session (de)serialization are moved into static helper functions,
while the top-level session (de)serialization only parses the Mbed TLS
version+config header and the TLS-version field, and dispatches according
to the found version.
This way, it will be easy to add support for TLS 1.3 sessions in the future.
- Tests for session serialization need to be adjusted
- Once we add support for TLS 1.3, with runtime negotiation of 1.2 vs. 1.3,
we will need to have some logic comparing the TLS version of the proposed session
to the negotiated TLS version. For now, however, we only support TLS 1.2,
and no such logic is needed. Instead, we just store the TLS version in the
session structure at the same point when we populate mbedtls_ssl_context.minor_ver.
The change introduces some overlap between `mbedtls_ssl_session.minor_ver` and
`mbedtls_ssl_context.minor_ver`, which should be studied and potentially resolved.
However, with both fields being private and explicitly marked so, this can happen
in a later change.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
The previous implementation was hard to understand and could in principle
fail to notice if there was a test case failure and the writing of the
line "Note: $TOTAL_FAIL failures." failed. KISS.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
What matters is that we validate that test data is not removed. Keeping the
test data is the most obvious way, but not the only way.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The import-and-save and load-and-check parts of the tests don't have to be
actually the same test cases.
Introduce the terms “forward compatibility” and “backward compatibility” and
relate them to import-and-save and load-and-check actions.
These are clarifications of intent that do not represent an intended change
in the strategy or intended coverage.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Previously the check was convoluted. This has been simplified
and given a more appropriate suggestion as per gilles suggestion
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
Call the output size macros specifically with asymmetric keys, which
would cause a crash (and thus test fail) should this fix get regressed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>
Although checking if the key was symmetric was correct, its easier to
read if we just check the block length is not zero before we use it in a
division.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>
