This check adds a few constraints on the way to build a project when we have
a proto file which imports another one. In particular, on projects which
build both C# and Java, it's easy to end up with exceptions like
Expected: included.proto but was src/main/protobuf/included.proto
A user may work around this issue, but it may add unnecessary constraints
on the layout of the project.
According to f3504cf3b1 (diff-ecb0b909ed572381a1c8d1994f09a948R309)
it has already been considered to get rid of this check, for
similar considerations, and because it doesn't exist in the Java code
This should fix the failures in the conformance tests - although
it highlights the problem that we need to do this when changing
the conformance.proto file...
We now just perform the optimization within AddRange itself.
This is a breaking change in terms of "drop in the DLL", but is
source compatible, which should be fine.
This doesn't currently change the ordering in the implementation, but allows us to do so in the future.
We also need to change
https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/csharp-generated#singular
which states "Finally, unlike Dictionary<TKey, TValue>, MapField<TKey, TValue> preserves insertion order of entries."
(We can just remove that sentence, I think.)
Also added a standalone formatter test, for confidence.
Have validated that undoing the change in 835fb947 breaks the tests
(i.e. we are still testing that the change is required).
(There are documentation changes and new fields in descriptor.proto that have resulted
in changes to the serialized descriptor, but no breaking changes for C#.)
Overview of changes:
- A new C#-specific command-line option, legacy_enum_values to revert to the old behavior
- When legacy_enum_values isn't specified, we strip the enum name as a prefix, and PascalCase the value name
- A new attribute within the C# code so that we can always tell the original in-proto name
Regenerating the C# code with legacy_enum_values leads to code which still compiles and works - but
there's more still to do.
I've moved both protoc.exe and the proto files out of Google.Protobuf.
The .proto files aren't a slam-dunk, but it feels like they belong with protoc as you'd *use* them with protoc.
It's not clear to me whether we really need both an x86 and x64 version of protoc.exe, as x86 would work on 64-bit Windows anyway. Discuss :)
This makes no externally visible behavioral changes. Internally and non-behaviorally:
- We use a field (compiler-generated) to store the JsonName to avoid recomputing it repeatedly
- The documentation for JsonName is updated to reflect the meaning better
- Readonly autoprops and expression-bodied properties used where possible
