protobuf/benchmarks
2018-01-10 10:25:24 -08:00
..
datasets Sync internal benchmark changes 2017-12-01 11:55:38 -08:00
java Fix java benchmark to use parser, fix cpp benchmark new arena to use Reset, format some files 2018-01-09 10:24:50 -08:00
__init__.py Add python benchmark 2018-01-05 11:20:40 -08:00
benchmarks.proto Addressed PR comments. 2016-05-03 12:53:49 -07:00
cpp_benchmark.cc Fix java benchmark to use parser, fix cpp benchmark new arena to use Reset, format some files 2018-01-09 10:24:50 -08:00
download_data.sh Sync internal benchmark changes 2017-12-01 11:55:38 -08:00
google_size.proto More cleanup, based around searches for "Google.ProtocolBuffers" 2015-06-26 20:13:07 +01:00
Makefile.am Fix java benchmark to use parser, fix cpp benchmark new arena to use Reset, format some files 2018-01-09 10:24:50 -08:00
py_benchmark.py Update py_benchmark.py 2018-01-10 10:25:24 -08:00
python_benchmark_messages.cc Add python benchmark 2018-01-05 11:20:40 -08:00
README.md Fix java benchmark to use parser, fix cpp benchmark new arena to use Reset, format some files 2018-01-09 10:24:50 -08:00

Protocol Buffers Benchmarks

This directory contains benchmarking schemas and data sets that you can use to test a variety of performance scenarios against your protobuf language runtime.

Prerequisite

First, you need to follow the instruction in the root directory's README to build your language's protobuf, then:

CPP

You need to install cmake before building the benchmark.

We are using google/benchmark as the benchmark tool for testing cpp. This will be automaticly made during build the cpp benchmark.

Java

We're using maven to build the java benchmarks, which is the same as to build the Java protobuf. There're no other tools need to install. We're using google/caliper as benchmark tool, which can be automaticly included by maven.

Python

We're using python C++ API for testing the generated CPP proto version of python protobuf, which is also a prerequisite for Python protobuf cpp implementation. You need to install the correct version of Python C++ extension package before run generated CPP proto version of Python protobuf's benchmark. e.g. under Ubuntu, you need to

$ sudo apt-get install python-dev
$ sudo apt-get install python3-dev

And you also need to make sure pkg-config is installed.

Big data

There's some optional big testing data which is not included in the directory initially, you need to run the following command to download the testing data:

$ ./download_data.sh

After doing this the big data file will automaticly generated in the benchmark directory.

Run instructions

To run all the benchmark dataset:

Java:

$ make java

CPP:

$ make cpp

Python:

We have three versions of python protobuf implementation: pure python, cpp reflection and cpp generated code. To run these version benchmark, you need to:

Pure Python:

$ make python-pure-python

CPP reflection:

$ make python-cpp-reflection

CPP generated code:

$ make python-cpp-generated-code

To run a specific dataset:

Java:

$ make java-benchmark
$ ./java-benchmark $(specific generated dataset file name) [-- $(caliper option)]

CPP:

$ make cpp-benchmark
$ ./cpp-benchmark $(specific generated dataset file name)

Python:

Pure Python:

$ make python-pure-python-benchmark
$ ./python-pure-python-benchmark $(specific generated dataset file name)

CPP reflection:

$ make python-cpp-reflection-benchmark
$ ./python-cpp-reflection-benchmark $(specific generated dataset file name)

CPP generated code:

$ make python-cpp-generated-code-benchmark
$ ./python-cpp-generated-code-benchmark $(specific generated dataset file name)

Benchmark datasets

Each data set is in the format of benchmarks.proto:

  1. name is the benchmark dataset's name.
  2. message_name is the benchmark's message type full name (including package and message name)
  3. payload is the list of raw data.

The schema for the datasets is described in benchmarks.proto.

Benchmark likely want to run several benchmarks against each data set (parse, serialize, possibly JSON, possibly using different APIs, etc).

We would like to add more data sets. In general we will favor data sets that make the overall suite diverse without being too large or having too many similar tests. Ideally everyone can run through the entire suite without the test run getting too long.