qt5base-lts/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/expected_skipcleanuptestcase.txt

********* Start testing of tst_SkipCleanupTestCase *********
Config: Using QtTest library
PASS   : tst_SkipCleanupTestCase::initTestCase()
PASS   : tst_SkipCleanupTestCase::aTestFunction()
SKIP   : tst_SkipCleanupTestCase::cleanupTestCase() Skip inside cleanupTestCase.
   Loc: [qtbase/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/skipcleanuptestcase/tst_skipcleanuptestcase.cpp(0)]
Totals: 2 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 0ms
********* Finished testing of tst_SkipCleanupTestCase *********
Test skip and fail in cleanup() as well as in cleanupTestCase() The skipcleanup and failcleanup tests were actually testing skip and fail in cleanupTestCase(), not in cleanup(). Add almost-duplicate tests and clean up so that we now have {fail,skip}cleanup(,testcase} tests to cover all four cases. Generated expected output. The new tests (with old names) get their fail or skip - during cleanup() - reported against the test instead of the cleanupTestCase function. (Results for {init,cleanup}TestCase() are always reported, even when these slots are not defined, as no-op passes.) Pick-to: 6.4 Change-Id: I0988d1696b50c0e2f30c45ddc25e1bd0bfd2151a Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io> 2022-07-11 12:27:28 +00:00			`******* Start testing of tst_SkipCleanupTestCase *******`
			`Config: Using QtTest library`
			`PASS : tst_SkipCleanupTestCase::initTestCase()`
			`PASS : tst_SkipCleanupTestCase::aTestFunction()`
			`SKIP : tst_SkipCleanupTestCase::cleanupTestCase() Skip inside cleanupTestCase.`
			`Loc: [qtbase/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/skipcleanuptestcase/tst_skipcleanuptestcase.cpp(0)]`
			`Totals: 2 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 0ms`
			`******* Finished testing of tst_SkipCleanupTestCase *******`