Fix erroneous exclusion of classes from related meta objects in moc
Assume an unrelated class that declares an enum and uses Q_ENUMS. Consider
then a class that uses UnrelatedClass::Enum as a Q_PROPERTY. We used to
include UnrelatedClass in the primary class's related meta objects, in order
to support use-cases like
obj->setProperty("enumProperty", "ValueOfEnumAsString");
If however moc happens to see Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(UnrelatedClass::Enum), then it
would exclude it from the related meta objects, which would silently break the
string based enum value conversion. This was meant as an optimization, but it
isn't apparent to the developer why sometimes the string conversion would
work and sometimes not (depending on whether somebody declares that macro).
This also becomes visible in QML, which relies on the same embedded type
information for enum assignments.
This patch removes that check in moc's code generator and cleans up the code a
little. However always including the prefix of Q_PROPERTY(SomePrefix::Enum ...)
is not correct either, because it may be that SomePrefix is a namespace, which
would cause compilation issues. Therefore we limit the inclusion of related
meta objects only to Q_OBJECT decorated classes the moc has seen, and for these
we save the fully qualified name in the related meta objects array (for QTBUG-2151).
While this patch makes the previous workaround for namespace issues by using a
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE not workable anymore, by saving the fully qualified name we
are making a hopefully sufficient effort to not require a workaround in the
first place. There's always the new workaround of fully qualifying the type in
Q_PROPERTY.
One side-effect of this change is that in the autoPropertyMetaTypeRegistration
test of tst_moc, the CustomQObject for Q_PROPERTY(CustomQObject::Number
enumValue ...) is now a related meta object, and therefore when querying for
the type of this property via QMetaProperty::userType(), we are now aware of
this being an enum and try to resolve CustomQObject::Number via
QMetaType::type(qualfiedName). As there is no guarantee for this to succeed, we
must now also do what is done in the non-enum code path in ::userType(), which
is to call the moc generated type registration function.
Task-number: QTBUG-33577
Task-number: QTBUG-2151
Change-Id: Ibf20e7421cba464c558a25c76a7e1eef002c6cff
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
2013-12-12 09:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
/****************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
2014-08-21 13:51:22 +00:00
|
|
|
** Copyright (C) 2014 Digia Plc and/or its subsidiary(-ies).
|
Fix erroneous exclusion of classes from related meta objects in moc
Assume an unrelated class that declares an enum and uses Q_ENUMS. Consider
then a class that uses UnrelatedClass::Enum as a Q_PROPERTY. We used to
include UnrelatedClass in the primary class's related meta objects, in order
to support use-cases like
obj->setProperty("enumProperty", "ValueOfEnumAsString");
If however moc happens to see Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(UnrelatedClass::Enum), then it
would exclude it from the related meta objects, which would silently break the
string based enum value conversion. This was meant as an optimization, but it
isn't apparent to the developer why sometimes the string conversion would
work and sometimes not (depending on whether somebody declares that macro).
This also becomes visible in QML, which relies on the same embedded type
information for enum assignments.
This patch removes that check in moc's code generator and cleans up the code a
little. However always including the prefix of Q_PROPERTY(SomePrefix::Enum ...)
is not correct either, because it may be that SomePrefix is a namespace, which
would cause compilation issues. Therefore we limit the inclusion of related
meta objects only to Q_OBJECT decorated classes the moc has seen, and for these
we save the fully qualified name in the related meta objects array (for QTBUG-2151).
While this patch makes the previous workaround for namespace issues by using a
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE not workable anymore, by saving the fully qualified name we
are making a hopefully sufficient effort to not require a workaround in the
first place. There's always the new workaround of fully qualifying the type in
Q_PROPERTY.
One side-effect of this change is that in the autoPropertyMetaTypeRegistration
test of tst_moc, the CustomQObject for Q_PROPERTY(CustomQObject::Number
enumValue ...) is now a related meta object, and therefore when querying for
the type of this property via QMetaProperty::userType(), we are now aware of
this being an enum and try to resolve CustomQObject::Number via
QMetaType::type(qualfiedName). As there is no guarantee for this to succeed, we
must now also do what is done in the non-enum code path in ::userType(), which
is to call the moc generated type registration function.
Task-number: QTBUG-33577
Task-number: QTBUG-2151
Change-Id: Ibf20e7421cba464c558a25c76a7e1eef002c6cff
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
2013-12-12 09:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
** Contact: http://www.qt-project.org/legal
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
** This file is part of the test suite of the Qt Toolkit.
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
2014-08-21 13:51:22 +00:00
|
|
|
** $QT_BEGIN_LICENSE:LGPL21$
|
Fix erroneous exclusion of classes from related meta objects in moc
Assume an unrelated class that declares an enum and uses Q_ENUMS. Consider
then a class that uses UnrelatedClass::Enum as a Q_PROPERTY. We used to
include UnrelatedClass in the primary class's related meta objects, in order
to support use-cases like
obj->setProperty("enumProperty", "ValueOfEnumAsString");
If however moc happens to see Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(UnrelatedClass::Enum), then it
would exclude it from the related meta objects, which would silently break the
string based enum value conversion. This was meant as an optimization, but it
isn't apparent to the developer why sometimes the string conversion would
work and sometimes not (depending on whether somebody declares that macro).
This also becomes visible in QML, which relies on the same embedded type
information for enum assignments.
This patch removes that check in moc's code generator and cleans up the code a
little. However always including the prefix of Q_PROPERTY(SomePrefix::Enum ...)
is not correct either, because it may be that SomePrefix is a namespace, which
would cause compilation issues. Therefore we limit the inclusion of related
meta objects only to Q_OBJECT decorated classes the moc has seen, and for these
we save the fully qualified name in the related meta objects array (for QTBUG-2151).
While this patch makes the previous workaround for namespace issues by using a
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE not workable anymore, by saving the fully qualified name we
are making a hopefully sufficient effort to not require a workaround in the
first place. There's always the new workaround of fully qualifying the type in
Q_PROPERTY.
One side-effect of this change is that in the autoPropertyMetaTypeRegistration
test of tst_moc, the CustomQObject for Q_PROPERTY(CustomQObject::Number
enumValue ...) is now a related meta object, and therefore when querying for
the type of this property via QMetaProperty::userType(), we are now aware of
this being an enum and try to resolve CustomQObject::Number via
QMetaType::type(qualfiedName). As there is no guarantee for this to succeed, we
must now also do what is done in the non-enum code path in ::userType(), which
is to call the moc generated type registration function.
Task-number: QTBUG-33577
Task-number: QTBUG-2151
Change-Id: Ibf20e7421cba464c558a25c76a7e1eef002c6cff
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
2013-12-12 09:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
** Commercial License Usage
|
|
|
|
|
** Licensees holding valid commercial Qt licenses may use this file in
|
|
|
|
|
** accordance with the commercial license agreement provided with the
|
|
|
|
|
** Software or, alternatively, in accordance with the terms contained in
|
2014-08-21 13:51:22 +00:00
|
|
|
** a written agreement between you and Digia. For licensing terms and
|
|
|
|
|
** conditions see http://qt.digia.com/licensing. For further information
|
Fix erroneous exclusion of classes from related meta objects in moc
Assume an unrelated class that declares an enum and uses Q_ENUMS. Consider
then a class that uses UnrelatedClass::Enum as a Q_PROPERTY. We used to
include UnrelatedClass in the primary class's related meta objects, in order
to support use-cases like
obj->setProperty("enumProperty", "ValueOfEnumAsString");
If however moc happens to see Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(UnrelatedClass::Enum), then it
would exclude it from the related meta objects, which would silently break the
string based enum value conversion. This was meant as an optimization, but it
isn't apparent to the developer why sometimes the string conversion would
work and sometimes not (depending on whether somebody declares that macro).
This also becomes visible in QML, which relies on the same embedded type
information for enum assignments.
This patch removes that check in moc's code generator and cleans up the code a
little. However always including the prefix of Q_PROPERTY(SomePrefix::Enum ...)
is not correct either, because it may be that SomePrefix is a namespace, which
would cause compilation issues. Therefore we limit the inclusion of related
meta objects only to Q_OBJECT decorated classes the moc has seen, and for these
we save the fully qualified name in the related meta objects array (for QTBUG-2151).
While this patch makes the previous workaround for namespace issues by using a
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE not workable anymore, by saving the fully qualified name we
are making a hopefully sufficient effort to not require a workaround in the
first place. There's always the new workaround of fully qualifying the type in
Q_PROPERTY.
One side-effect of this change is that in the autoPropertyMetaTypeRegistration
test of tst_moc, the CustomQObject for Q_PROPERTY(CustomQObject::Number
enumValue ...) is now a related meta object, and therefore when querying for
the type of this property via QMetaProperty::userType(), we are now aware of
this being an enum and try to resolve CustomQObject::Number via
QMetaType::type(qualfiedName). As there is no guarantee for this to succeed, we
must now also do what is done in the non-enum code path in ::userType(), which
is to call the moc generated type registration function.
Task-number: QTBUG-33577
Task-number: QTBUG-2151
Change-Id: Ibf20e7421cba464c558a25c76a7e1eef002c6cff
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
2013-12-12 09:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
** use the contact form at http://qt.digia.com/contact-us.
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
** GNU Lesser General Public License Usage
|
|
|
|
|
** Alternatively, this file may be used under the terms of the GNU Lesser
|
2014-08-21 13:51:22 +00:00
|
|
|
** General Public License version 2.1 or version 3 as published by the Free
|
|
|
|
|
** Software Foundation and appearing in the file LICENSE.LGPLv21 and
|
|
|
|
|
** LICENSE.LGPLv3 included in the packaging of this file. Please review the
|
|
|
|
|
** following information to ensure the GNU Lesser General Public License
|
|
|
|
|
** requirements will be met: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html and
|
|
|
|
|
** http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html.
|
Fix erroneous exclusion of classes from related meta objects in moc
Assume an unrelated class that declares an enum and uses Q_ENUMS. Consider
then a class that uses UnrelatedClass::Enum as a Q_PROPERTY. We used to
include UnrelatedClass in the primary class's related meta objects, in order
to support use-cases like
obj->setProperty("enumProperty", "ValueOfEnumAsString");
If however moc happens to see Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(UnrelatedClass::Enum), then it
would exclude it from the related meta objects, which would silently break the
string based enum value conversion. This was meant as an optimization, but it
isn't apparent to the developer why sometimes the string conversion would
work and sometimes not (depending on whether somebody declares that macro).
This also becomes visible in QML, which relies on the same embedded type
information for enum assignments.
This patch removes that check in moc's code generator and cleans up the code a
little. However always including the prefix of Q_PROPERTY(SomePrefix::Enum ...)
is not correct either, because it may be that SomePrefix is a namespace, which
would cause compilation issues. Therefore we limit the inclusion of related
meta objects only to Q_OBJECT decorated classes the moc has seen, and for these
we save the fully qualified name in the related meta objects array (for QTBUG-2151).
While this patch makes the previous workaround for namespace issues by using a
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE not workable anymore, by saving the fully qualified name we
are making a hopefully sufficient effort to not require a workaround in the
first place. There's always the new workaround of fully qualifying the type in
Q_PROPERTY.
One side-effect of this change is that in the autoPropertyMetaTypeRegistration
test of tst_moc, the CustomQObject for Q_PROPERTY(CustomQObject::Number
enumValue ...) is now a related meta object, and therefore when querying for
the type of this property via QMetaProperty::userType(), we are now aware of
this being an enum and try to resolve CustomQObject::Number via
QMetaType::type(qualfiedName). As there is no guarantee for this to succeed, we
must now also do what is done in the non-enum code path in ::userType(), which
is to call the moc generated type registration function.
Task-number: QTBUG-33577
Task-number: QTBUG-2151
Change-Id: Ibf20e7421cba464c558a25c76a7e1eef002c6cff
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
2013-12-12 09:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
** In addition, as a special exception, Digia gives you certain additional
|
2014-08-21 13:51:22 +00:00
|
|
|
** rights. These rights are described in the Digia Qt LGPL Exception
|
Fix erroneous exclusion of classes from related meta objects in moc
Assume an unrelated class that declares an enum and uses Q_ENUMS. Consider
then a class that uses UnrelatedClass::Enum as a Q_PROPERTY. We used to
include UnrelatedClass in the primary class's related meta objects, in order
to support use-cases like
obj->setProperty("enumProperty", "ValueOfEnumAsString");
If however moc happens to see Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(UnrelatedClass::Enum), then it
would exclude it from the related meta objects, which would silently break the
string based enum value conversion. This was meant as an optimization, but it
isn't apparent to the developer why sometimes the string conversion would
work and sometimes not (depending on whether somebody declares that macro).
This also becomes visible in QML, which relies on the same embedded type
information for enum assignments.
This patch removes that check in moc's code generator and cleans up the code a
little. However always including the prefix of Q_PROPERTY(SomePrefix::Enum ...)
is not correct either, because it may be that SomePrefix is a namespace, which
would cause compilation issues. Therefore we limit the inclusion of related
meta objects only to Q_OBJECT decorated classes the moc has seen, and for these
we save the fully qualified name in the related meta objects array (for QTBUG-2151).
While this patch makes the previous workaround for namespace issues by using a
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE not workable anymore, by saving the fully qualified name we
are making a hopefully sufficient effort to not require a workaround in the
first place. There's always the new workaround of fully qualifying the type in
Q_PROPERTY.
One side-effect of this change is that in the autoPropertyMetaTypeRegistration
test of tst_moc, the CustomQObject for Q_PROPERTY(CustomQObject::Number
enumValue ...) is now a related meta object, and therefore when querying for
the type of this property via QMetaProperty::userType(), we are now aware of
this being an enum and try to resolve CustomQObject::Number via
QMetaType::type(qualfiedName). As there is no guarantee for this to succeed, we
must now also do what is done in the non-enum code path in ::userType(), which
is to call the moc generated type registration function.
Task-number: QTBUG-33577
Task-number: QTBUG-2151
Change-Id: Ibf20e7421cba464c558a25c76a7e1eef002c6cff
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
2013-12-12 09:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
** version 1.1, included in the file LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt in this package.
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
** $QT_END_LICENSE$
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
****************************************************************************/
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-17 12:49:41 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifndef RELATED_METAOBJECTS_IN_NAMESPACES_H
|
|
|
|
|
#define RELATED_METAOBJECTS_IN_NAMESPACES_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix erroneous exclusion of classes from related meta objects in moc
Assume an unrelated class that declares an enum and uses Q_ENUMS. Consider
then a class that uses UnrelatedClass::Enum as a Q_PROPERTY. We used to
include UnrelatedClass in the primary class's related meta objects, in order
to support use-cases like
obj->setProperty("enumProperty", "ValueOfEnumAsString");
If however moc happens to see Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(UnrelatedClass::Enum), then it
would exclude it from the related meta objects, which would silently break the
string based enum value conversion. This was meant as an optimization, but it
isn't apparent to the developer why sometimes the string conversion would
work and sometimes not (depending on whether somebody declares that macro).
This also becomes visible in QML, which relies on the same embedded type
information for enum assignments.
This patch removes that check in moc's code generator and cleans up the code a
little. However always including the prefix of Q_PROPERTY(SomePrefix::Enum ...)
is not correct either, because it may be that SomePrefix is a namespace, which
would cause compilation issues. Therefore we limit the inclusion of related
meta objects only to Q_OBJECT decorated classes the moc has seen, and for these
we save the fully qualified name in the related meta objects array (for QTBUG-2151).
While this patch makes the previous workaround for namespace issues by using a
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE not workable anymore, by saving the fully qualified name we
are making a hopefully sufficient effort to not require a workaround in the
first place. There's always the new workaround of fully qualifying the type in
Q_PROPERTY.
One side-effect of this change is that in the autoPropertyMetaTypeRegistration
test of tst_moc, the CustomQObject for Q_PROPERTY(CustomQObject::Number
enumValue ...) is now a related meta object, and therefore when querying for
the type of this property via QMetaProperty::userType(), we are now aware of
this being an enum and try to resolve CustomQObject::Number via
QMetaType::type(qualfiedName). As there is no guarantee for this to succeed, we
must now also do what is done in the non-enum code path in ::userType(), which
is to call the moc generated type registration function.
Task-number: QTBUG-33577
Task-number: QTBUG-2151
Change-Id: Ibf20e7421cba464c558a25c76a7e1eef002c6cff
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
2013-12-12 09:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <QObject>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace QTBUG_2151 {
|
|
|
|
|
class A : public QObject {
|
|
|
|
|
Q_OBJECT
|
|
|
|
|
Q_ENUMS(SomeEnum)
|
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
|
enum SomeEnum { SomeEnumValue = 0 };
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class B : public QObject
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
Q_OBJECT
|
|
|
|
|
Q_PROPERTY(A::SomeEnum blah READ blah)
|
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A::SomeEnum blah() const { return A::SomeEnumValue; }
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-01-17 12:49:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif // RELATED_METAOBJECTS_IN_NAMESPACES_H
|
