testlib: add QFINDTESTDATA macro for finding testdata files
Automated tests often need to load some data from external files.
Currently, a wide variety of approaches for this have been used in Qt
autotests, including:
- embed the source directory into the test binary at compile time, and
find the testdata relative to that; this fails when the source tree
is no longer available (e.g. when the tests are deployed to a device).
- use a path relative to the current working directory, and trust that
the caller always sets the current working directory such that the
testdata can be found; this fails when the caller uses a different
working directory than expected.
- use a path relative to QCoreApplication::applicationDirPath();
this fails when source tree != build tree (since testdata is not
automatically copied into the build tree).
- compile the files into the binary using the Qt resource system; this
should work, but does not allow for testing of code which genuinely
needs external files.
It seems that there is not a simple method for determining the testdata
path which can be reliably used in all circumstances, so various tests
have reinvented the testdata location method in different ways.
Therefore, this is a good candidate for an addition to the testlib API.
The current implementation of QFINDTESTDATA is able to find testdata
in all three of (build tree, install tree, source tree), in that order.
Change-Id: Ib2fed860723ccf437240da3b00db22dfe1a6b56c
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
2011-11-29 06:45:52 +00:00
|
|
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
|
2021-07-29 15:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
<testsuite name="FindTestData" timestamp="@TEST_START_TIME@" hostname="@HOSTNAME@" tests="3" failures="0" errors="0" skipped="0" time="@TEST_DURATION@">
|
testlib: add QFINDTESTDATA macro for finding testdata files
Automated tests often need to load some data from external files.
Currently, a wide variety of approaches for this have been used in Qt
autotests, including:
- embed the source directory into the test binary at compile time, and
find the testdata relative to that; this fails when the source tree
is no longer available (e.g. when the tests are deployed to a device).
- use a path relative to the current working directory, and trust that
the caller always sets the current working directory such that the
testdata can be found; this fails when the caller uses a different
working directory than expected.
- use a path relative to QCoreApplication::applicationDirPath();
this fails when source tree != build tree (since testdata is not
automatically copied into the build tree).
- compile the files into the binary using the Qt resource system; this
should work, but does not allow for testing of code which genuinely
needs external files.
It seems that there is not a simple method for determining the testdata
path which can be reliably used in all circumstances, so various tests
have reinvented the testdata location method in different ways.
Therefore, this is a good candidate for an addition to the testlib API.
The current implementation of QFINDTESTDATA is able to find testdata
in all three of (build tree, install tree, source tree), in that order.
Change-Id: Ib2fed860723ccf437240da3b00db22dfe1a6b56c
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
2011-11-29 06:45:52 +00:00
|
|
|
<properties>
|
2020-07-21 23:38:42 +00:00
|
|
|
<property name="QTestVersion" value="@INSERT_QT_VERSION_HERE@"/>
|
|
|
|
|
<property name="QtVersion" value="@INSERT_QT_VERSION_HERE@"/>
|
|
|
|
|
<property name="QtBuild" value=""/>
|
testlib: add QFINDTESTDATA macro for finding testdata files
Automated tests often need to load some data from external files.
Currently, a wide variety of approaches for this have been used in Qt
autotests, including:
- embed the source directory into the test binary at compile time, and
find the testdata relative to that; this fails when the source tree
is no longer available (e.g. when the tests are deployed to a device).
- use a path relative to the current working directory, and trust that
the caller always sets the current working directory such that the
testdata can be found; this fails when the caller uses a different
working directory than expected.
- use a path relative to QCoreApplication::applicationDirPath();
this fails when source tree != build tree (since testdata is not
automatically copied into the build tree).
- compile the files into the binary using the Qt resource system; this
should work, but does not allow for testing of code which genuinely
needs external files.
It seems that there is not a simple method for determining the testdata
path which can be reliably used in all circumstances, so various tests
have reinvented the testdata location method in different ways.
Therefore, this is a good candidate for an addition to the testlib API.
The current implementation of QFINDTESTDATA is able to find testdata
in all three of (build tree, install tree, source tree), in that order.
Change-Id: Ib2fed860723ccf437240da3b00db22dfe1a6b56c
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
2011-11-29 06:45:52 +00:00
|
|
|
</properties>
|
testlib: Improve JUnit XML conformance
The JUnit test framework did not initially have any XML reporting
facilities built in. Instead, the XML report was generated by the
Apache Ant JUnit task:
https://github.com/apache/ant/search?q=filename%3AXMLJUnitResultFormatter.java
Many users interacted with these reports via the Jenkins JUnit plugin,
which provided graphical visualization of the test results:
https://plugins.jenkins.io/junit/
Due to the lack of an official XML schema for the Apache Ant JUnit
report there was some confusion about what the actual format was.
People started documenting the de-facto format, both as produced
by Ant, and as consumed by Jenkins:
https://github.com/windyroad/JUnit-Schema/blob/master/JUnit.xsd
https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/search?q=filename%3Ajenkins-junit.xsd
The XML produced by the Qt Test JUnit reporter was far from these
schemas, causing issues when importing results into tools such
as Jenkins, Allure2, or Test Center.
The following changes have been made to improve conformance:
- The 'timestamp' attribute on <testsuite> is is now in ISO
8601 local time, without any time zone specified
- The 'hostname' attribute on <testsuite> is now included
- The 'classname' attribute on <testcase> is now included
- The non-standard 'result' attribute on <testcase> has
been removed
- The non-standard 'result' attribute on <failure> has
been renamed to 'type'
- The <system-out> element on <testsuite> is always included,
even when empty
- The non-standard 'tag' attribute on <failure> has been
removed. Data-driven tests are now represented as individual
<testcase> elements, e.g.:
<testcase name="someTest(someData X)" ...>
<testcase name="someTest(someData Y)" ...>
<testcase name="someTest(someData Z)" ...>
The resulting XML validates against both the de-facto Apache Ant
'JUnit 4' schema and the Jenkins JUnit plugin schema.
Task-number: QTBUG-95424
Change-Id: I6fc9abedbfb319f2545b99b37d059b18c16776ff
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
2021-07-29 07:59:59 +00:00
|
|
|
<testcase name="initTestCase" classname="FindTestData" time="@TEST_DURATION@"/>
|
|
|
|
|
<testcase name="paths" classname="FindTestData" time="@TEST_DURATION@">
|
2021-08-03 10:50:26 +00:00
|
|
|
<system-err>
|
|
|
|
|
<![CDATA[testdata testfile could not be located!]]>
|
|
|
|
|
</system-err>
|
testlib: add QFINDTESTDATA macro for finding testdata files
Automated tests often need to load some data from external files.
Currently, a wide variety of approaches for this have been used in Qt
autotests, including:
- embed the source directory into the test binary at compile time, and
find the testdata relative to that; this fails when the source tree
is no longer available (e.g. when the tests are deployed to a device).
- use a path relative to the current working directory, and trust that
the caller always sets the current working directory such that the
testdata can be found; this fails when the caller uses a different
working directory than expected.
- use a path relative to QCoreApplication::applicationDirPath();
this fails when source tree != build tree (since testdata is not
automatically copied into the build tree).
- compile the files into the binary using the Qt resource system; this
should work, but does not allow for testing of code which genuinely
needs external files.
It seems that there is not a simple method for determining the testdata
path which can be reliably used in all circumstances, so various tests
have reinvented the testdata location method in different ways.
Therefore, this is a good candidate for an addition to the testlib API.
The current implementation of QFINDTESTDATA is able to find testdata
in all three of (build tree, install tree, source tree), in that order.
Change-Id: Ib2fed860723ccf437240da3b00db22dfe1a6b56c
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
2011-11-29 06:45:52 +00:00
|
|
|
</testcase>
|
testlib: Improve JUnit XML conformance
The JUnit test framework did not initially have any XML reporting
facilities built in. Instead, the XML report was generated by the
Apache Ant JUnit task:
https://github.com/apache/ant/search?q=filename%3AXMLJUnitResultFormatter.java
Many users interacted with these reports via the Jenkins JUnit plugin,
which provided graphical visualization of the test results:
https://plugins.jenkins.io/junit/
Due to the lack of an official XML schema for the Apache Ant JUnit
report there was some confusion about what the actual format was.
People started documenting the de-facto format, both as produced
by Ant, and as consumed by Jenkins:
https://github.com/windyroad/JUnit-Schema/blob/master/JUnit.xsd
https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/search?q=filename%3Ajenkins-junit.xsd
The XML produced by the Qt Test JUnit reporter was far from these
schemas, causing issues when importing results into tools such
as Jenkins, Allure2, or Test Center.
The following changes have been made to improve conformance:
- The 'timestamp' attribute on <testsuite> is is now in ISO
8601 local time, without any time zone specified
- The 'hostname' attribute on <testsuite> is now included
- The 'classname' attribute on <testcase> is now included
- The non-standard 'result' attribute on <testcase> has
been removed
- The non-standard 'result' attribute on <failure> has
been renamed to 'type'
- The <system-out> element on <testsuite> is always included,
even when empty
- The non-standard 'tag' attribute on <failure> has been
removed. Data-driven tests are now represented as individual
<testcase> elements, e.g.:
<testcase name="someTest(someData X)" ...>
<testcase name="someTest(someData Y)" ...>
<testcase name="someTest(someData Z)" ...>
The resulting XML validates against both the de-facto Apache Ant
'JUnit 4' schema and the Jenkins JUnit plugin schema.
Task-number: QTBUG-95424
Change-Id: I6fc9abedbfb319f2545b99b37d059b18c16776ff
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
2021-07-29 07:59:59 +00:00
|
|
|
<testcase name="cleanupTestCase" classname="FindTestData" time="@TEST_DURATION@"/>
|
testlib: add QFINDTESTDATA macro for finding testdata files
Automated tests often need to load some data from external files.
Currently, a wide variety of approaches for this have been used in Qt
autotests, including:
- embed the source directory into the test binary at compile time, and
find the testdata relative to that; this fails when the source tree
is no longer available (e.g. when the tests are deployed to a device).
- use a path relative to the current working directory, and trust that
the caller always sets the current working directory such that the
testdata can be found; this fails when the caller uses a different
working directory than expected.
- use a path relative to QCoreApplication::applicationDirPath();
this fails when source tree != build tree (since testdata is not
automatically copied into the build tree).
- compile the files into the binary using the Qt resource system; this
should work, but does not allow for testing of code which genuinely
needs external files.
It seems that there is not a simple method for determining the testdata
path which can be reliably used in all circumstances, so various tests
have reinvented the testdata location method in different ways.
Therefore, this is a good candidate for an addition to the testlib API.
The current implementation of QFINDTESTDATA is able to find testdata
in all three of (build tree, install tree, source tree), in that order.
Change-Id: Ib2fed860723ccf437240da3b00db22dfe1a6b56c
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
2011-11-29 06:45:52 +00:00
|
|
|
</testsuite>
|