qt5base-lts/examples/widgets/itemviews/storageview/main.cpp

80 lines
3.2 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/****************************************************************************
**
** Copyright (C) 2016 The Qt Company Ltd.
** Copyright (C) 2016 Ivan Komissarov
** Contact: https://www.qt.io/licensing/
**
** This file is part of the examples of the Qt Toolkit.
**
** $QT_BEGIN_LICENSE:BSD$
** Commercial License Usage
** Licensees holding valid commercial Qt licenses may use this file in
** accordance with the commercial license agreement provided with the
** Software or, alternatively, in accordance with the terms contained in
** a written agreement between you and The Qt Company. For licensing terms
** and conditions see https://www.qt.io/terms-conditions. For further
** information use the contact form at https://www.qt.io/contact-us.
**
** BSD License Usage
** Alternatively, you may use this file under the terms of the BSD license
** as follows:
**
** "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
** modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
** met:
** * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
** notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
** * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
** notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
** the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
** distribution.
** * Neither the name of The Qt Company Ltd nor the names of its
** contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
** from this software without specific prior written permission.
**
**
** THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
** "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
** LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
** A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
** OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
** SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
** LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
** DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
** THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
** (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
** OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE."
**
** $QT_END_LICENSE$
**
****************************************************************************/
#include <QApplication>
#include <QShortcut>
#include <QTreeView>
#include "storagemodel.h"
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QApplication a(argc, argv);
QTreeView view;
view.resize(640, 480);
view.setWindowTitle("Storage View");
view.setSelectionBehavior(QAbstractItemView::SelectRows);
StorageModel *model = new StorageModel(&view);
model->refresh();
Long live QKeyCombination! C++20 via P1120 is deprecating arithmetic operations between unrelated enumeration types, and GCC 10 is already complaining. Hence, these operations might become illegal in C++23 or C++26 at the latest. A case of this that affects Qt is in key combinations: a QKeySequence can be constructed by summing / ORing modifiers and a key, for instance: Qt::CTRL + Qt::Key_A Qt::SHIFT | Qt::CTRL | Qt::Key_G (recommended, see below) The problem is that the modifiers and the key belong to different enumerations (and there's 2 enumerations for the modifier, and one for the key). To solve this: add a dedicated class to represent a combination of keys, and operators between those enumerations to build instances of this class. I would've simply defined operator|, but again docs and pre-existing code use operator+ as well, so added both to at least tackle simple cases (modifier + key). Multiple modifiers create a problem: operator+ between them yields int, not the corresponding flags type (because operator+ is not overloaded for this use case): Qt::CTRL + Qt::SHIFT + Qt::Key_A \__________________/ / int / \______________/ int Not only this loses track of the datatypes involved, but it would also then "add" the key (with NO warnings, now its int + enum, so it's not mixing enums!) and yielding int again. I don't want to special-case this; the point of the class is that int is the wrong datatype. Everything works just fine when using operator| instead: Qt::CTRL | Qt::SHIFT | Qt::Key_A \__________________/ / Qt::Modifiers / \______________/ QKeyCombination So I'm defining operator+ so that the simple cases still work, but also deprecating it. Port some code around Qt to the new class. In certain cases, it's a huge win for clarity. In some others, I've just added the necessary casts to make it still compile without warnings, without attempting refactorings. [ChangeLog][QtCore][QKeyCombination] New class to represent a combination of a key and zero or more modifiers, to be used when defining shortcuts or similar. [ChangeLog][Potentially Source-Incompatible Changes] A keyboard modifier (such as Qt::CTRL, Qt::AltModifier, etc.) should be combined with a key (such as Qt::Key_A, Qt::Key_F1, etc.) by using operator|, not operator+. The result is now an object of type QKeyCombination, that stores the key and the modifiers. Change-Id: I657a3a328232f059023fff69c5031ee31cc91dd6 Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
2020-04-19 17:56:18 +00:00
QShortcut *refreshShortcut = new QShortcut(Qt::CTRL | Qt::Key_R, &view);
QObject::connect(refreshShortcut, &QShortcut::activated, model, &StorageModel::refresh);
view.setModel(model);
int columnCount = view.model()->columnCount();
for (int c = 0; c < columnCount; ++c)
view.resizeColumnToContents(c);
view.show();
return a.exec();
}