qt5base-lts/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/expected_failcleanuptestcase.tap

TAP version 13
# tst_FailCleanupTestCase
ok 1 - initTestCase()
ok 2 - aTestFunction()
not ok 3 - cleanupTestCase()
  ---
  type: QVERIFY
  message: Fail inside cleanupTestCase
  wanted: true (false)
  found: false (false)
  expected: true (false)
  actual: false (false)
  at: tst_FailCleanupTestCase::cleanupTestCase() (qtbase/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/failcleanuptestcase/tst_failcleanuptestcase.cpp:0)
  file: qtbase/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/failcleanuptestcase/tst_failcleanuptestcase.cpp
  line: 0
  ...
1..3
# tests 3
# pass 2
# fail 1
Test skip and fail in cleanup() as well as in cleanupTestCase() The skipcleanup and failcleanup tests were actually testing skip and fail in cleanupTestCase(), not in cleanup(). Add almost-duplicate tests and clean up so that we now have {fail,skip}cleanup(,testcase} tests to cover all four cases. Generated expected output. The new tests (with old names) get their fail or skip - during cleanup() - reported against the test instead of the cleanupTestCase function. (Results for {init,cleanup}TestCase() are always reported, even when these slots are not defined, as no-op passes.) Pick-to: 6.4 Change-Id: I0988d1696b50c0e2f30c45ddc25e1bd0bfd2151a Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io> 2022-07-11 12:27:28 +00:00			`TAP version 13`
			`# tst_FailCleanupTestCase`
			`ok 1 - initTestCase()`
			`ok 2 - aTestFunction()`
			`not ok 3 - cleanupTestCase()`
			`---`
			`type: QVERIFY`
			`message: Fail inside cleanupTestCase`
			`wanted: true (false)`
			`found: false (false)`
			`expected: true (false)`
			`actual: false (false)`
			`at: tst_FailCleanupTestCase::cleanupTestCase() (qtbase/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/failcleanuptestcase/tst_failcleanuptestcase.cpp:0)`
			`file: qtbase/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/failcleanuptestcase/tst_failcleanuptestcase.cpp`
			`line: 0`
			`...`
			`1..3`
			`# tests 3`
			`# pass 2`
			`# fail 1`