QTimeZonePrivate: remove some Q_LIKELY markers
Although the relevant conditions are indeed likely, we don't want to push the less likely branch into hard-to-load pages; they're not anomalous conditions, merely ones with lower probability. Change-Id: Icc12a921d38d8c398cd832964e9d57d7648698b2 Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
49063c34d6
commit
187f442823
@ -380,18 +380,15 @@ QTimeZonePrivate::Data QTimeZonePrivate::dataForLocalTime(qint64 forLocalMSecs,
|
||||
On the first pass, the case we consider is what hint told us to expect
|
||||
(except when hint was -1 and didn't actually tell us what to expect),
|
||||
so it's likely right. We only get a second pass if the first failed,
|
||||
by which time the second case, that we're trying, is likely right. If
|
||||
an overwhelming majority of calls have hint == -1, the Q_LIKELY here
|
||||
shall be wrong half the time; otherwise, its errors shall be rarer
|
||||
than that.
|
||||
by which time the second case, that we're trying, is likely right.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (nextFirst ? i == 0 : i) {
|
||||
Q_ASSERT(nextStart != invalidMSecs());
|
||||
if (Q_LIKELY(nextStart <= nextTran.atMSecsSinceEpoch))
|
||||
if (nextStart <= nextTran.atMSecsSinceEpoch)
|
||||
return nextTran;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// If next is invalid, nextFirst is false, to route us here first:
|
||||
if (nextStart == invalidMSecs() || Q_LIKELY(nextStart > tran.atMSecsSinceEpoch))
|
||||
if (nextStart == invalidMSecs() || nextStart > tran.atMSecsSinceEpoch)
|
||||
return tran;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -420,7 +417,7 @@ QTimeZonePrivate::Data QTimeZonePrivate::dataForLocalTime(qint64 forLocalMSecs,
|
||||
|
||||
int early = offsetFromUtc(recent);
|
||||
int late = offsetFromUtc(imminent);
|
||||
if (Q_LIKELY(early == late)) { // > 99% of the time
|
||||
if (early == late) { // > 99% of the time
|
||||
utcEpochMSecs = forLocalMSecs - early * 1000;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Close to a DST transition: early > late is near a fall-back,
|
||||
@ -432,7 +429,7 @@ QTimeZonePrivate::Data QTimeZonePrivate::dataForLocalTime(qint64 forLocalMSecs,
|
||||
const qint64 forStd = forLocalMSecs - offsetInStd * 1000;
|
||||
// Best guess at the answer:
|
||||
const qint64 hinted = hint > 0 ? forDst : forStd;
|
||||
if (Q_LIKELY(offsetFromUtc(hinted) == (hint > 0 ? offsetInDst : offsetInStd))) {
|
||||
if (offsetFromUtc(hinted) == (hint > 0 ? offsetInDst : offsetInStd)) {
|
||||
utcEpochMSecs = hinted;
|
||||
} else if (hint <= 0 && offsetFromUtc(forDst) == offsetInDst) {
|
||||
utcEpochMSecs = forDst;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user