From 2f945aaa263d4688724d11e6ba7f768c4dc6bdd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Giuseppe D'Angelo Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 11:12:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] QProcess: remove a XFAIL for QNX 91dcc76fc1 might have fixed the underlying issue, so we no longer need the XFAIL codepath at all. Fixes: QTBUG-114720 Change-Id: I67ccbed67a0536b679c50c26eb0b3e51c93dceeb Pick-to: 6.6 Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer --- tests/auto/corelib/io/qprocess/tst_qprocess.cpp | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/auto/corelib/io/qprocess/tst_qprocess.cpp b/tests/auto/corelib/io/qprocess/tst_qprocess.cpp index 8a927dc4fd..030dcb7993 100644 --- a/tests/auto/corelib/io/qprocess/tst_qprocess.cpp +++ b/tests/auto/corelib/io/qprocess/tst_qprocess.cpp @@ -1807,10 +1807,6 @@ void tst_QProcess::unixProcessParameters() QVERIFY(process.waitForFinished(5000)); const QString stdErr = process.readAllStandardError(); -#ifdef Q_OS_QNX - if (stdErr != QString()) - QEXPECT_FAIL("ignore-sigpipe", "QTBUG-114720: flag is sometimes ignored", Abort); -#endif QCOMPARE(stdErr, QString()); QCOMPARE(process.readAll(), QString()); QCOMPARE(process.exitCode(), 0);