The flag makes the build fail for UWP as well as desktop Windows . It
will trigger a compile error as soon as UWP API is used, which happens
in qtbase for desktop in the direct2d backend, but it is also used for
other Qt modules, so we decided to disable the flag for now.
This patch partly reverts b7d76e533c
Task-number: QTBUG-61239
Change-Id: I0cc630f4c09c52f0c116f4a7b95a44c3a55e0be3
Reviewed-by: Maurice Kalinowski <maurice.kalinowski@qt.io>
That's not the same as -Za.
Change-Id: Ica9894dc9b5e48278fd4fffd14bb316b687abffe
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Let's not allow any new code that uses non-conforming syntaxes. With
GCC and like, we already use -std=c++11 instead of -std=gnu++11 for that
very reason.
Change-Id: I4a7dc1fe14154695b968fffd14aba9f8cea69c47
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Wolff <oliver.wolff@qt.io>
Neither the Intel compiler nor Visual C++ have a dedicated switch to
enable F16C support, like GCC and Clang do. So we used the AVX switch
for that in commit 8241d51f70, as it was
the closest, lowest denominator. That was incorrect and insufficient.
The Intel compiler silently miscompiles the intrinsics with -xAVX,
making calls to out-of-line functions like _mm_cvtps_ph, which don't
exist. So we actually have to use AVX2 support to generate correct code.
That might be a problem later, since Ivy Bridge supports F16C but not
AVX2.
Visual C++ is able to generate F16C code with just -arch:AVX.
Either way, since there's no dedicated command-line switch, there's also
no dedicated preprocessor macro. We're using __AVX2__ for both
compilers, as that's a sufficient condition to indicate a processor that
supports F16C.
Change-Id: I27b55fdf514247549455fffd14b205b8d8b86da7
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
Building qt with msvc would fail with the -developer-build configure
option turned on under simplified chinese locale.
This is because msvc will emit warnings for source files with utf-8
characters which are not representable in CP936, and -developer-build
implies treating warnings as errors.
This patch turn on -utf-8 compiler option for msvc2015 update 2
and up only for building qt.
Task-number: QTBUG-58161
Change-Id: If38ea11eb1f39f8e08efa1cccb92e0eea50daf92
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
Since we can tell the MSVC version from the compiler now, each of the
qmake.conf files is now the same, so let's just have "win32-msvc" and be
future-proof. Likewise for win32-clang-msvc.
qplatformdefs.h was already common.
Since we can't obtain the MSVC version from the unified mkspec name any
more, I dropped the warning level during the qmake bootstrap to reduce
the number of warnings that need to be disabled from compiler version to
version.
There is no point in keeping the old mkspecs, but configure will re-map
the -platform argument to the unified spec as necessary, to keep
existing configure command lines working.
[ChangeLog][Visual Studio] Qt now has a common mkspec for all Visual
Studio versions, called "win32-msvc". The old names which contained the
version number are now gone (but qmake scopes based on the old names
continue to work). The version of the compiler can be obtained from the
MSC_VER and MSVC_VER variables (for example, for Visual Studio 2015,
those contain the values 1900 and 14.0, respectively). Those variables
are also available with the Intel compiler (win32-icc) and with Clang
(win32-clang-msvc).
Done-with: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
Change-Id: Ib57b52598e2f452985e9fffd14587c0a77a5c09c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
We're asking the compiler anyway, so we can fully use this information
just as well. Note that this actually happens after the spec itself has
been processed, so it was necessary to delay the version-specific flag
handling as well.
Change-Id: Ib57b52598e2f452985e9fffd14587b581d946022
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
