Skip ends the test (albeit inconclusively). Rearrange the enums in
the abstract logger, move code to handle skip between relevant
function and tidy up various things that became simpler as a result.
Also reorder the message enum, and its switches, to separate testlib's
internals from the usual Qt messages, and put each group in ascending
order of severity.
Task-number: QTBUG-96844
Change-Id: I2c7a634b9f849830d64eafa750155e66e244b729
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
TestMethods::invokeTest() has an outer loop on global data (albeit
with a comment that said otherwise). On its first cycle, we run the
test function's *_data() method, if it has one; there is an inner loop
on the rows this created. If the *_data() QSKIP()s, we need to skip
the whole test; otherwise, a QSKIP() in one sub-test should not lead
to skipping the remaining sub-tests.
Moved the check for *_data() QSKIP()ping to right after *_data()
returns, inside the "first global cycle" block that runs it.
Previously, this check was done before entering the loop on local data
rows, but outside that "first global cycle" block: consequently, later
global cycles would fall foul of this check (even though the *_data()
hasn't been run in this cycle, much less QSKIP()ped in it) if the last
sub-test of the previous global cycle had QSKIP()ped.
When running a single test for one specific data row, if the test's
*_data() QSKIP()ped, this misplaced check would also have lead to a
misleading "Unknown testdata" warning.
Changed testlib/selftests' tst_globaldata::skipSingle() to trigger the
bug (by having its last local row of first global row skip, which
caused the second global row to be omitted) to verify this is also
fixed; and amended one of its comments to reflect what's now to be
expected. Updated the test's expected output files.
Task-number: QTBUG-61774
Change-Id: I99596b595c6d1184038f23383844c6ff51a0cd91
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@qt.io>
In particular, document the mis-behavior it takes for granted in one
test. Renamed some variables so that they're visually distinct from
one another and actually mean something intelligible. Renamed the
sub-tests to say what's actually happening. Reading the test output
now at least makes it possible to see what's wrong. I'll fix that in
a later commit.
Task-number: QTBUG-61774
Change-Id: I3e5f83b8baa3c6afbca9231b5bbc89d17f3e57e2
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@qt.io>
In selftests.qrc, imposed alphabetic order (on stem of name, then on
suffix, effectively treating . as sorting before any letter) while
removing old tests and adding new tests and data. Updated all non-csv
files and added many missing files. (Not clear on csv support status;
the script seems to have dropped it after 5.6, but the test still uses
it.)
Left expected_crashes* alone (no new files added, no update to old) as
I don't get results resembling those anticipated.
Omitted printdatatagswithglobaltags, printdatatags due to dangling
hspace on output lines, which upset sanity-bot. A change to the test
cpp is needed to make it viable to skip that dangling hspace.
Change-Id: Iab3fb626c44a91c249b2fb626c12c75ea0317098
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
Added flowId='name' to each message when using TeamCity logging format.
This is necessary to distinguish separate processes running in parallel.
[ChangeLog][QtTest] Added flowId to messages when logging in TeamCity
format. FlowId is used to distinguish logging from multiple processes
running in parallel.
Change-Id: I7f5046c1058ff02770404caa2c9b3a5398f97f6b
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This allows TeamCity to parse realtime test-results instead of using
post-build XML Report Processing. This does not support logging of
benchmarks.
[ChangeLog][QTest] Added a new logging mode that allow test-results to
be parsed on-the-fly when using Jetbrains TeamCity as CI-server. This
mode is enabled by using the -teamcity option on the command-line.
Change-Id: Ie730beb643043eb0f448f99abe6c0b5ac48aaf03
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
