Also regenerate the expected output for tst_selftests, to match new
output. Changed one line source code in tst_seftests for the
same purpose.
Change-Id: I930ba4bb290568d6f67a8910a781725f01f08bf1
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Says GCC:
In function ‘char* QTest::toString(QPair<T1, T2>&) [with T1 = QWidget*; T2 = QEvent::Type]’,
warning: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Wformat-overflow=]
Fix by re-using formatString(), once introduced for std::tuple.
As a side-effect, this gets rid of the funny double-quotes around the
output.
Change-Id: I2dd5f10fa2b3a392370bf487c1b7e98f3d190978
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Make QPair an alias for std::pair, and qMakePair just a forwarder
towards std::make_pair.
Why? Fundamentally to ditch a bunch of NIH code; gain for free
structured bindings, std::tuple and std::reference_wrapper
compatibility, and so on.
Breakages:
* Some that code manually forward declares QPair.
We don't care about it (<QContainerFwd> is the proper way).
* Some code that overloads on std::pair and QPair. Luckily
it's mostly centralized: debug, metatypes, testing macros.
Just remove the QPair overload.
* Usages of qMakePair forcing the template type parameters.
There are a handful of these in qtbase, but only one was actually
broken.
* std::pair is NOT (and will never likely be) trivially copiable.
This is agreed to be a mistake done by practically all implementations
in C++11, can can't be fixed without breaking ABI.
Some code using QPair assuming it's trivially copiable may break;
exactly one occurrence was in qtbase.
* QMetaType logic extracts the type names in two different ways,
one by looking at the source code string (e.g. extracted by moc)
and one via some ad-hoc reflection in C++. We need to make
"QPair" (as spelled in the source code) be the same as "std::pair"
(gathered via reflection, which will see through the alias)
when compared. The way it's already done e.g. for QList is
by actually replacing the moc-extracted name with the name
of the actual type used in C++; do the same here.
On libc++, std::pair is actually in an inline namespace --
i.e. std::__1::pair; the reflection will extract and store
"std::__1::pair" so we need an ad-hoc fix to QMetaType.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QPair] QPair is now an alias to std::pair,
and does not exist as a class in Qt any more. This may break
code such as functions overloaded for both QPair and std::pair.
Usually, the overload taking a QPair can be safely discarded,
leaving only the one taking a std::pair. QPair API has not changed,
and qMakePair is still available for compatibility (although
new code is encouraged to use std::pair and std::make_pair
directly instead).
Change-Id: I7725c751bf23946cde577b1406e86a336c0a3dcf
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
In selftests.qrc, imposed alphabetic order (on stem of name, then on
suffix, effectively treating . as sorting before any letter) while
removing old tests and adding new tests and data. Updated all non-csv
files and added many missing files. (Not clear on csv support status;
the script seems to have dropped it after 5.6, but the test still uses
it.)
Left expected_crashes* alone (no new files added, no update to old) as
I don't get results resembling those anticipated.
Omitted printdatatagswithglobaltags, printdatatags due to dangling
hspace on output lines, which upset sanity-bot. A change to the test
cpp is needed to make it viable to skip that dangling hspace.
Change-Id: Iab3fb626c44a91c249b2fb626c12c75ea0317098
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
Currently when doing comparison with pair-like classes the fallback
toString method is called which returns a Q_NULLPTR thus not allowing
proper diagnostic of the values that triggered an error. This patch
adds support for QPair and std::pair to improve the tests output
readability.
[ChangeLog][QtTest][QCOMPARE] Now outputs contents of QPair and
std::pair on failure.
Change-Id: Ib0b4aad7640590d56275b6f1306fb9fb39fa81bc
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
