The current implementation of qIsNull only returns true if the value is
positive zero. This behaviour is not useful for use cases like
QPointF::isNull, where QPointF(-0, -0).isNull() will return false.
There doesn't seem to be a reason why the function exhibits this
behaviour (-0.0 is not accounted for in the unit tests), and for the
case of QSizeF::scale it causes a bug: qIsNull is used to check for
division by 0.0 before it proceeds, which fails in the case of -0.0.
Task-number: QTBUG-7303
Change-Id: I767e5280bd26614e8e78ae62b274eb9bc4ade385
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Gunnar Sletta <gunnar.sletta@nokia.com>
qVariantValue and qVariantCanConvert are Compatibility members, while in
Qt4.8 they are marked as Qt 3 Support Members.
qVariantFromValue and qVariantSetValue are Obsolete members.
Change-Id: Ie8505cad1e0950e40c6f6710fde9f6fb2ac670fd
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@nokia.com>
As in the past, to avoid rewriting various autotests that contain
line-number information, an extra blank line has been inserted at the
end of the license text to ensure that this commit does not change the
total number of lines in the license header.
Change-Id: I311e001373776812699d6efc045b5f742890c689
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
