Various compilers have various fun ways of failing to compile when it
is used so let's check if they will work properly during configure
rather than much later.
Change-Id: Ia93d4b91b3d269b4cab2a5f677c3c89e06b44ce3
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
If available, use a C++17 std::pmr::unordered_set with a monotonic
buffer resource and a 256-byte stack buffer to avoid the per-element
allocations of QSet.
Results on my machine:
RESULT : tst_QStringList::removeDuplicates():"empty":
- 0.00014 msecs per iteration (total: 74, iterations: 524288)
+ 0.000031 msecs per iteration (total: 66, iterations: 2097152)
RESULT : tst_QStringList::removeDuplicates():"short-dup-0.00":
- 0.00043 msecs per iteration (total: 57, iterations: 131072)
+ 0.00013 msecs per iteration (total: 69, iterations: 524288)
RESULT : tst_QStringList::removeDuplicates():"short-dup-0.50":
- 0.00049 msecs per iteration (total: 65, iterations: 131072)
+ 0.00032 msecs per iteration (total: 85, iterations: 262144)
RESULT : tst_QStringList::removeDuplicates():"short-dup-0.66":
- 0.00057 msecs per iteration (total: 75, iterations: 131072)
+ 0.00039 msecs per iteration (total: 52, iterations: 131072)
RESULT : tst_QStringList::removeDuplicates():"short-dup-0.75":
- 0.00064 msecs per iteration (total: 85, iterations: 131072)
+ 0.00048 msecs per iteration (total: 63, iterations: 131072)
RESULT : tst_QStringList::removeDuplicates():"long-dup-0.00":
- 0.083 msecs per iteration (total: 85, iterations: 1024)
+ 0.039 msecs per iteration (total: 80, iterations: 2048)
RESULT : tst_QStringList::removeDuplicates():"long-dup-0.50":
- 0.11 msecs per iteration (total: 58, iterations: 512)
+ 0.078 msecs per iteration (total: 80, iterations: 1024)
RESULT : tst_QStringList::removeDuplicates():"long-dup-0.66":
- 0.13 msecs per iteration (total: 70, iterations: 512)
+ 0.10 msecs per iteration (total: 53, iterations: 512)
RESULT : tst_QStringList::removeDuplicates():"long-dup-0.75":
- 0.16 msecs per iteration (total: 86, iterations: 512)
+ 0.13 msecs per iteration (total: 69, iterations: 512)
When interpreting the data, take into account that each iteration
contains _also_ a deep copy of the QStringList d/t the detach from
'input'.
The pattern is used elsewhere in Qt, so I've put the class that
implements the seen set into a private header file and used in some
other places I found.
Change-Id: I1f71a82008a16d5a3818f91f290ade21d837805e
Reviewed-by: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo@kdab.com>
Conflicts:
src/corelib/tools/qvector.h
Make QVector(DataPointer dd) public to be able to properly merge
5b4b437b30 from 5.15 into dev.
src/widgets/kernel/qapplication.cpp
tests/auto/tools/moc/allmocs_baseline_in.json
Done-With: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
Change-Id: I929ba7c036d570382d0454c2c75f6f0d96ddbc01
As opposed to unite(), this inserts one map into the other
without duplicating elements.
Task-number: QTBUG-35544
Change-Id: Ie8ab350b29148851a3176cef1007e8a4ca82c273
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
The concept was a nice idea to avoid accidental detach() calls
in implicitly shared containers, but it conflicts with a C++11
compatible API for them, with signatures for modifying methods
taking a const_iterator as argument and returning an iterator
(e.g. iterator erase(const_iterator)).
Change-Id: Ia33124bedbd260774a0a66f49aedd84e19c9971b
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
The macro is not documented, so not part of the public Qt API. It is
made obsolete by the alignof keyword in C++11.
Remove the usage of the macro across qtbase, in particular the
workarounds for compilers that didn't support alignof, and that will
not be supported in Qt 6.
The macro definition is left in place, no need to break existing
code.
Task-number: QTBUG-76414
Change-Id: I1cfedcd4dd748128696cdfb546d97aae4f98c3da
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
If c++17 is available and the header is available (not
experimental/filesystem) then we'll try
std::filesystem::recursive_directory_iterator as well.
Results on my PC (Windows, VS 2019):
PASS : tst_qdiriterator::posix(C:\depot\qt\main/src/corelib)
RESULT : tst_qdiriterator::posix():"C:\depot\qt\main/src/corelib":
23 msecs per iteration (total: 94, iterations: 4)
PASS : tst_qdiriterator::diriterator(C:\depot\qt\main/src/corelib)
RESULT : tst_qdiriterator::diriterator():"C:\depot\qt\main/src/corelib":
17 msecs per iteration (total: 71, iterations: 4)
PASS : tst_qdiriterator::stdRecursiveDirectoryIterator(C:\depot\qt\main/src/corelib)
RESULT : tst_qdiriterator::stdRecursiveDirectoryIterator():"C:\depot\qt\main/src/corelib":
6.7 msecs per iteration (total: 54, iterations: 8)
PASS : tst_qdiriterator::fsiterator(C:\depot\qt\main/src/corelib)
RESULT : tst_qdiriterator::fsiterator():"C:\depot\qt\main/src/corelib":
23 msecs per iteration (total: 92, iterations: 4)
And as a drive-by fix: move the 'data' function out of the private slots
so it is not invoked as a test function (it doesn't cause any problems
but is ultimately pointless).
Change-Id: Ia160ee276423ec51e35e554a4cd63d4d940c0e6a
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Results on my machine:
PASS : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly(QMutex)
RESULT : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly():QMutex:
3,607 msecs per iteration (total: 3,607, iterations: 1)
PASS : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly(QReadWriteLock)
RESULT : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly():QReadWriteLock:
39,703 msecs per iteration (total: 39,703, iterations: 1)
PASS : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly(std::mutex)
RESULT : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly():std::mutex:
3,697 msecs per iteration (total: 3,697, iterations: 1)
PASS : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly(std::shared_mutex)
RESULT : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly():std::shared_mutex:
5,727 msecs per iteration (total: 5,727, iterations: 1)
PASS : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly(std::shared_timed_mutex)
RESULT : tst_QReadWriteLock::writeOnly():std::shared_timed_mutex:
5,921 msecs per iteration (total: 5,921, iterations: 1)
(the 'nothing' test of course doesn't work with writing, as writing to
the same QString from different threads is UB)
Change-Id: Ia78b54963a51eaf6563ce0d243316a3337056a83
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Test more methods.
Document what the existing test covers.
Use the right #include for QDate.
Change-Id: I051542c244e5bc381aafa3ae38144e246919db7a
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Aside from the start-date and the end-date, and a variant with a
time-zone, the lists various tests were building were all built the
same way; so pack that up as a pair of functions (one without
time-zone, one with) to save duplication. Make the list in each
function const, ready for conversion of foreach loops to ranged for.
In the process, replace QList with QVector, reserve space before we
populate and use auto for the now-const list variables it's saved in.
Change-Id: I7d8cce459a4d6111cd645e8d3966ad769ab7e201
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Multiplying a Julian Day number by the number of milliseconds per day
does not get you a time since the start of 1970; it gets you a time
since the start of the Julian Day number system, which was several
millennia earlier.
Change-Id: Ic90a6c3de445baf9cfd30f28dd847f146e6a7adf
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
The benchmark measures the performance of QObject allocation,
including costs of memory allocations.
Change-Id: I5d8ecfb97fe0be3375340b5ce84eb423e8a4ddaf
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
This commit re-applies commit f8efe8e0c9,
which was lost in the recent tools → text changes.
Change-Id: I03ce35fcb89840e5607776d67578fb75b66f6eb2
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
It's not done by toWCharArray. This caused some issues as we were using
API requiring a null-terminator. wcslen for instance was measuring the
string as being millions of characters long, causing fairly quick
crashes when appending.
Change-Id: Iedaaf9f195be22a610543ab649da92a87cb71973
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
This changes many different CMake places to mention Qt6 instead of
Qt5.
Note that some old qt5 cmake config files in corelib are probably not
needed anymore, but I still renamed and kept them for now.
Change-Id: Ie69e81540386a5af153f76c0242e18d48211bec4
That's an undocumented Qt 4/3/2 remnant, start remove usages.
Fix incorrect include header in qclass_lib_map.h as a drive-by.
Change-Id: I939be2621bc03e5c75f7e3f152546d3af6d37b91
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
We'll be adding calendar code here as well, and tools/ was getting
rather crowded, so it looks like time to move out a reasonably
coherent sub-bundle of it all.
Change-Id: I7e8030f38c31aa307f519dd918a43fc44baa6aa1
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
The two perform related calculations, so test them together.
RESULT : tst_QDate::monthLengths():
0.33 msecs per iteration (total: 87, iterations: 256)
Change-Id: I86b36a9182b00c0a1f40e858ed3e7812434974c4
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
QTimer::singleShot is optimized for zero timeouts when using the API
taking a string method name. This optimization was not used for the API
taking a PMF or functor. This patch adds it, making the various API
calls behave similarly from a performance point of view.
The approach taken here requires a QObject context object. If none is
available, e.g. a nullptr was passed explicitly, or the
QTimer::singleShot(O, Functor) API was used, the optimization could
not easily be applied. This is not only bad from a performance POV,
but also poses as a potential source for heisenbugs: Using the
different API versions of QTimer::singleShot would use different code
paths internally, which then would not ensure the expected slot call
order. This problem actually existed already when mixing the
string-based slot syntax with PMF/functors in the QTimer::singleShot
API.
This patch overcomes this hurdle and fixes all of the above: When we
encounter a 0ms single shot timer, and no QObject context object is
available, we fall back to the main thread, or create a temporary
QObject for any other thread. The updated and extended benchmark
shows that this is still a significant performance improvement
over using a timer:
********* Start testing of qtimer_vs_qmetaobject *********
Config: Using QtTest library 5.14.0, Qt 5.14.0 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 8.2.1 20181127)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::initTestCase()
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(singleShot_slot)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"singleShot_slot":
7.48 msecs per iteration (total: 748, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(singleShot_pmf)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"singleShot_pmf":
7.20 msecs per iteration (total: 720, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(singleShot_functor)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"singleShot_functor":
6.79 msecs per iteration (total: 679, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(singleShot_functor_noctx)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"singleShot_functor_noctx":
6.92 msecs per iteration (total: 693, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(invokeMethod_string)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"invokeMethod_string":
7.34 msecs per iteration (total: 735, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(invokeMethod_pmf)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"invokeMethod_pmf":
6.90 msecs per iteration (total: 690, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(invokeMethod_functor)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"invokeMethod_functor":
6.62 msecs per iteration (total: 662, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(singleShot_slot)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"singleShot_slot":
7.45 msecs per iteration (total: 745, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(singleShot_pmf)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"singleShot_pmf":
7.46 msecs per iteration (total: 747, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(singleShot_functor)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"singleShot_functor":
6.70 msecs per iteration (total: 671, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(singleShot_functor_noctx)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"singleShot_functor_noctx":
13.75 msecs per iteration (total: 1,376, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(invokeMethod_string)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"invokeMethod_string":
7.05 msecs per iteration (total: 706, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(invokeMethod_pmf)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"invokeMethod_pmf":
6.70 msecs per iteration (total: 670, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(invokeMethod_functor)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"invokeMethod_functor":
6.58 msecs per iteration (total: 658, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 16 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 20977ms
********* Finished testing of qtimer_vs_qmetaobject *********
Without the change to qtimer.cpp, the results are:
********* Start testing of qtimer_vs_qmetaobject *********
Config: Using QtTest library 5.14.0, Qt 5.14.0 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 8.2.1 20181127)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::initTestCase()
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(singleShot_slot)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"singleShot_slot":
7.45 msecs per iteration (total: 745, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(singleShot_pmf)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"singleShot_pmf":
112.84 msecs per iteration (total: 11,285, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(singleShot_functor)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"singleShot_functor":
115.62 msecs per iteration (total: 11,563, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(singleShot_functor_noctx)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"singleShot_functor_noctx":
110.81 msecs per iteration (total: 11,082, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(invokeMethod_string)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"invokeMethod_string":
7.04 msecs per iteration (total: 704, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(invokeMethod_pmf)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"invokeMethod_pmf":
6.62 msecs per iteration (total: 662, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench(invokeMethod_functor)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::bench():"invokeMethod_functor":
6.62 msecs per iteration (total: 662, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(singleShot_slot)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"singleShot_slot":
7.45 msecs per iteration (total: 746, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(singleShot_pmf)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"singleShot_pmf":
118.42 msecs per iteration (total: 11,842, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(singleShot_functor)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"singleShot_functor":
119.35 msecs per iteration (total: 11,936, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(singleShot_functor_noctx)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"singleShot_functor_noctx":
130.96 msecs per iteration (total: 13,096, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(invokeMethod_string)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"invokeMethod_string":
8.08 msecs per iteration (total: 808, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(invokeMethod_pmf)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"invokeMethod_pmf":
6.79 msecs per iteration (total: 680, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread(invokeMethod_functor)
RESULT : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::benchBackgroundThread():"invokeMethod_functor":
7.49 msecs per iteration (total: 749, iterations: 100)
PASS : qtimer_vs_qmetaobject::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 16 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 153995ms
********* Finished testing of qtimer_vs_qmetaobject *********
Additionally, this patch adds a unit test to verify that the slot call
order for 0ms single shot timers is followed while mixing the various
API versions. It fails without this patch but passes now.
Finally, another test is added to verify that using QTimer::singleShot
before a QCoreApplication was constructed is still working properly.
Change-Id: I0d6211554b6198cb3e527be9ec3adc572b1b54ee
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
