And send it in our 'SETTINGS' frame. Add an auto-test
for this and (as a bonus) - fix a bug accidentally
introduced by the previous change.
Task-number: QTBUG-77412
Change-Id: I4277ff47e8d8d3b6b8666fbcd7dc73c827f349c0
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Similar to TLS configuration that we can use on QNetworkRequest,
we can configure different options in our HTTP/2 handling by
providing QNetworkAccessManager with h2 configuration. Previously,
it was only possible internally in our auto-test - a hack with
QObject's properties and a private class. Now it's time to provide
a public API for this.
[ChangeLog][QtNetwork][QNetworkRequest] Add an ability to configure HTTP/2 protocol
Change-Id: I80266a74f6dcdfabb7fc05ed1dce17897bcda886
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
This patch was generated with tooling from patchset 31 of
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtqa/+/267034 in interactive
mode. General platform names were chosen if greater than 60% of the
currently active platforms of a given type in COIN recently failed.
Change-Id: Ia4bde7f0ec422bbb727dc9d7151295159094f146
Reviewed-by: Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt <eskil.abrahamsen-blomfeldt@qt.io>
some assumptions were incorrect: our test server immediately sends
its SETTINGS frame, as a result we have to reply with client preface +
SETTINGS(ACK). So QVERIFY(!prefaceOK) was wrong from the beginning and
was only passing by pure luck.
Change-Id: Ie43f0d4ac41deb0e5339badaae6149a9b2f9d9b3
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
One of the tests above was unsetting a variable that enforces
the use of a temporary keychain. We have to set it back, otherwise
the test is failing. What surprises me though - why I had this
problem only locally and not on CI? Apparently, SecureTransport
is not covered by our configurations ...
Change-Id: I0ff1e3e304632869391ed61213c245b949d8c778
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
QNetworkAccessManager::connectToHostEncrypted()/connectToHost()
creates 'fake' requests with pseudo-schemes 'preconnect-https'/
'preconnect-http'. QHttp2ProtocolHandler should handle this
requests in a special way - reporting them immediately as
finished (so that QNAM emits finished as it does in case of
HTTP/1.1) and not trying to send anything.
We also have to properly cache the connection - 'https' or
'http' scheme is too generic - it allows (unfortunately)
mixing H2/HTTP/1.1 in a single connection in case an attribute
was missing on a request, which is wrong.
h2c is more complicated, since it needs a real request
to negotiate the protocol switch to H2, with the current
QNetworkHttpConnection(Channel)'s design it's not possible
without large changes (aka regressions and new bugs introduced).
Auto-test extended.
Fixes: QTBUG-77082
Change-Id: I03467673a620c89784c2d36521020dc9d08aced7
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
warning C4573: the usage of 'tst_QNetworkReply::connect' requires the
compiler to capture 'this' but the current default capture mode does not
allow it
Change-Id: Ic9fd526fedf7c52e53e2b1136834c10bf4cd0ea9
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
It's not implemented
Change-Id: I56abb0a5fe0e6d5c2f5f678adadafed395456902
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
1. Use per-case QNAM objects
2. In a slots (connected to QNetworkReplies) - if an error detected - stop
the event loop (no reason to continue waiting) and then do normal
QVERIFY/QCOMPARE things.
3. In tests, check QTest::currentTestFailed after the event loop returned -
if an error was detected by a slot, no need to continue with QCOMPARE/QVERIFY
in the test itself.
Task-number: QTBUG-77053
Change-Id: I3827a629a2749becd3dc6eee7fd6994d96441e65
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
fix the bloody test for good - the idea to have a shared QNAM (shared
by test cases in this test) was somewhat wrong to start with.
Fixes: QTBUG-77053
Change-Id: I5755e96ec988e2dd546f527f3f902fc43914b0b7
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
As in QVarLengthArray (c34242c679), this will
probably bite someone someday, so fix it before there's a bug report.
Use ctor delegation to keep code size increase small.
There's also the benefit that default-constructing a QNetworkRequest now
no longer creates an expensive QUrl object just to destroy it unused again.
Add an auto-test.
Change-Id: I5ceb5402ca3946048d695244d1b1c36564a1e80a
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
These tests have not failed on the removed platforms for at least 60 days
Task-number: QTBUG-76608
Change-Id: If7a9f4db907124e3cd54e3f4b0ad3e20717d1912
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
QNetworkSession has a concept of UsagePolicy which can disable
background* transfers to conserve battery or bandwidth. However, it is
only possible to change the policy through
QNetworkSessionPrivate::setUsagePolicy which currently doesn't have any
callers outside of our auto tests.
*background = transfers not initiated directly by the user, but needs
to be marked as such by the application developer.
Change-Id: I92c4abccaca040612b4795abe7c52d68a2d21749
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
QSslSocket (OpenSSL backend) does not use mutex/locks during
a handshake, so we re-enable previously skipped tests.
This reverts commit 8c87a1402c.
Change-Id: I994b085f016f0eb18b3ba439a7041ea08cd3577b
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
This is part of the migration of qtbase from QRexExp to
QRegularExpression.
Task-number: QTBUG-72587
Change-Id: Ibdd3f63d9069c3f01dfe8431bcc64bde4f2aa569
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
We use global object to store errors found by q_X509Callback.
Thus, we also use a lock/mutex. It would appear all tests
involving in-process server and QNAM are prone to intermittent
failures on our Windows VMs - it's always about timeouts due
to the client socket (QNAM) locking and the server socket blocking
main thread while trying to acquire the same lock.
The real fix is to re-write our verification callback so that
it does not need locking/does not block the main and 'http'
threads as a result. But such change is too dangerous for
5.13.0 so we instead have a somewhat handicapped/reduced
test on Windows.
The fixed QSSlSocket will go into 5.13.
Task-number: QTBUG-76157
Change-Id: Ia54701bcb3f6f079a69e52c8904ac3efcee4a787
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
to test different h2 modes: "h2c" (clear text with protocol upgrade),
"h2" (encrypted, negotiating via ALPN extension), "h2-direct" (encrypted,
no ALPN), "h2c-direct" (plain text, no protocol upgrade). This patch-set
is an amendment to the recent fix in the protocol handler where we were
crashing in "h2c-direct" mode.
Change-Id: I3ff5ed1396a59b72b59a95f927d404ccd202d0b8
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
In the QNetworkAccessManager machinery we would treat "no-cache" as if
it meant "don't cache" while in reality it means "don't return these
cached elements without making sure they're up-to-date"
At the same time as this change is made let's add test data for
"no-store", which replaces the "no-cache" test data.
Fixes: QTBUG-71896
Change-Id: Ieda98f3982884ccc839cac2420c777968c786f6e
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mikhail Svetkin <mikhail.svetkin@qt.io>
We use global object to store errors found by q_X509Callback.
Thus, we also use a lock/mutex. It would appear all tests
involving in-process server and QNAM are prone to intermittent
failures on our Windows VMs - it's always about timeouts due
to the client socket (QNAM) locking and the server socket blocking
main thread while trying to acquire the same lock.
The real fix is to get rid of global variable/locking, we'll
have it later (quite a change and requires a lot of accuracy).
Task-number: QTBUG-76247
Change-Id: Iffc90d9e16783f17f62e836e01c35f22681bdd39
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
(cherry picked from commit 91ab70d17f)
Reviewed-by: Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikkinen@qt.io>
Fix test for systems that do not resolve their hostname to localhost.
Not using name resolution also makes the test more robust.
Change-Id: I558b9a975b9021536709db87fbf6a3b314f7ca79
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
... except where they are actually the component under test.
Java-style iterators are scheduled for deprecation.
Change-Id: If4399f7f74c5ffc0f7e65205e422edfa1d908ee8
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
We use global object to store errors found by q_X509Callback.
Thus, we also use a lock/mutex. It would appear all tests
involving in-process server and QNAM are prone to intermittent
failures on our Windows VMs - it's always about timeouts due
to the client socket (QNAM) locking and the server socket blocking
main thread while trying to acquire the same lock.
The real fix is to get rid of global variable/locking, we'll
have it later (quite a change and requires a lot of accuracy).
Task-number: QTBUG-76247
Change-Id: Iffc90d9e16783f17f62e836e01c35f22681bdd39
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
'accept' breaks the order, making the static table unsorted and thus
std::lower_bound cannot find it and we always index it in a dynamic
table. Also, make this static table accessible to auto-test.
Plus fix some warnings quite annoyingly visible in qt-creator.
Fixes: QTBUG-74161
Change-Id: I47410f2ef974ac92797c9804aa55cb5c36a436c4
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
1. Fix erroneous logic, which was triggered in 'h2' mode (non-TLS connection)
- after the initial protocol upgrade/POST request was handled, the server
(on Windows specifically) was erroneously handling upcoming DATA frames by replying
with another redirect response.
2. Make the test less heavy by sending 1 MB of Qt::Uninitialize instead of 10 MB
- theoretically this could cause a timeout before the redirected request finished
successfully.
Task-number: QTBUG-73873
Change-Id: I961e0a5f50252988edd46d0e73baf96ee22eef3f
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
