The future tests don't need QtConcurrent as QFuture and friends are in
QtCore. The printdevice test doesn't use QtNetwork and the lancelot as
well as the testlib tests don't use QtXml.
Change-Id: I150ac99b36682aa23ad22ba943266eb0f0952838
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
This new function does the same as newRow(), except that it has a less confusing
name (in line with _add_Column()), and accepts printf-style arguments to avoid
the need to newRow(qPrintable(QString::asprintf())), a common pattern in client
code. It uses qvsnprintf() under the hoods, avoiding the need for the QString
const char* round-trip.
Port all in-tree users of newRow(qPrintable(QString::asnprintf())) to the new
function.
Change-Id: Icd5de9b7ea4f6759d98080ec30f5aecadb8bec39
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The test was so slow it was blacklisted on all platforms for timing out.
This patch lowers the timeout to a 5th and tries removing the blacklist.
Change-Id: Ib28b21de572517c548a14300f26815598efe91e2
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
By templating on the <chrono> types and unconditionally using
duration_cast to coerce the duration into a milliseconds, we
allowed code such as
mutex.try_lock_for(10us)
to compile, which is misleading, since it's actually a zero-
timeout try_lock().
Feedback from the std-discussions mailing list is that the
wait_for functions should wait for _at least_ the duration
given, because that is the natural direction of variance
(tasks becoming ready to run might not get a CPU immediately,
causing delays), while an interface that documents to wait
_no more_ than the given duration is promising something it
cannot fulfill.
Fix by converting the given duration to the smallest number
of milliseconds not less than the original duration. If that
is not representable in an int, use INT_MAX, emulating the
effect of a spurious wakeup, which are allowed to happen if
the function returns false in that case.
In the above example, the try_lock_for call is now equivalent
to
mutex.tryLock(1);
The tryLock() docs state that the actual waiting time does
not exceed the given milliseconds, but fixing that is a
separate issue.
Change-Id: Id4cbbea0ecc6fd2f94bb5aef28a1658be3728e52
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This test fails on Windows occasionally with values just short of 800, the lowest
observed being 791. It is probably rounding somehow to 10ms segments, so allow
it to be up to 10 ms too fast.
Change-Id: Ie28e9f61588b68a9060a006f78eedc3a26d05155
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
Consistent with other Unix platforms, and internally consistent between tests,
as a lot of tests were already applying CONFIG -= app_bundle manually.
Change-Id: Icd2b7e1c08015b26137af60ff82fddbc753f0ff4
Reviewed-by: Jake Petroules <jake.petroules@qt.io>
The adoptedThreads test never spawned any thread causing a test error
later on. Hence add a winrt version using __beginthreadex which exists
for that platform.
Change-Id: I04f980218713df20cb41d804d732e0c99b958489
Reviewed-by: Oliver Wolff <oliver.wolff@qt.io>
Now QBasicMutex is Lockable and QMutex is TimedLockable, which means they can
be used in std::lock_guard, std::unique_lock, std::lock, etc.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QMutex] QMutex now fully models the TimedLockable
concept by providing the try_lock, try_lock_for and try_lock_until
functions, therefore making it usable in Standard Library lock
management classes and functions.
Change-Id: I7c691481a5781a696701e1ab78186b5cefbd6a87
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
This requires fixing the test on Windows: QMutex internally uses
WaitForSingleObjectEx which can wake up early, according to the system
timer resolution:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms687069(v=vs.85).aspx#waitfunctionsandtime-outintervals
QTime must be so slow that it hides the early wakes, but QElapsedTimer is
accurate enough to make the test fail unless we add back some tolerance to
compensate for the early wakeups.
Change-Id: I20b38af9c87a0b0e38a19b9bff1c3c24975c78f5
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Drop addSub() test. It executes exactly the union of fetchAndAdd()
and fetchAndSub(), which have already had their UBs fixed.
No need to do fixes in duplicated code.
Change-Id: Ib72caab0310fce3ff9a40c261d8a38518f91ecaf
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
This change partially reverts 1bfc7f68 about QT_HAS_BUILTIN define
and undef in src/corelib/tools/qsimd_p.h.
This change is also squashed with "Fall back to c++11 standard
compiler flag for host builds" which is done by Peter Seiderer.
Conflicts:
mkspecs/features/default_post.prf
src/3rdparty/sqlite/0001-Fixing-the-SQLite3-build-for-WEC2013-again.patch
src/3rdparty/sqlite/sqlite3.c
src/corelib/tools/qsimd_p.h
src/gui/kernel/qevent.cpp
src/gui/kernel/qwindowsysteminterface.cpp
src/gui/kernel/qwindowsysteminterface_p.h
src/plugins/bearer/blackberry/blackberry.pro
src/plugins/platforms/cocoa/qcocoasystemsettings.mm
src/plugins/platformthemes/gtk2/gtk2.pro
src/plugins/styles/bb10style/bb10style.pro
src/sql/drivers/sqlite2/qsql_sqlite2.cpp
tools/configure/configureapp.cpp
Task-number: QTBUG-51644
Done-with: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
Change-Id: I6100d6ace31b2e8d41a95f0b5d5ebf8f1fd88b44
Signed integer overflows and underflows are undefined
behavior. A test that invokes UB tests nothing, because
the standard permits any outcome.
Fix by guarding the respective operations so
they are not executed if they would overflow
or underflow.
Change-Id: I40354ee88f40e4b47b70eac7790dc3a79ac70a57
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
I wrote a script to help find the files, but I reviewed the
contributions manually to be sure I wasn't claiming copyright for search
& replace, adding Q_DECL_NOTHROW or adding "We mean it" headers.
Change-Id: I7a9e11d7b64a4cc78e24ffff142b506368fc8842
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
Not that we require it, but since The Qt Company did it for all files
they have copyright, even if they haven't touched the file in years
(especially not in 2016), I'm doing the same.
Change-Id: I7a9e11d7b64a4cc78e24ffff142b4c9d53039846
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
From Qt 5.7 -> tools & applications are lisenced under GPL v3 with some
exceptions, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new GPL-EXCEPT header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under GPL 3 with exceptions)
Change-Id: I42a473ddc97101492a60b9287d90979d9eb35ae1
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
[ChangeLog][Important Behavior Changes] Starting with Qt 5.7, Qt
requires a C++11 compiler with support for C++11 atomics. This affects
user code too: Qt headers no longer compile with a C++98 compiler. The
minimum compiler versions for this release are:
* Clang 3.4 (found in XCode 5.1)
* GCC 4.7
* Microsoft Visual Studio 2012
Change-Id: Ib056b47dde3341ef9a52ffff13ef1f496ea9363f
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@gmail.com>
TEST_HELPER_INSTALLS cannot be used on platforms with no
QProcess support.
Change-Id: I2a6a283d94ca4487fc628449c53fc37140dd291d
Reviewed-by: Oliver Wolff <oliver.wolff@theqtcompany.com>
Replace hardcoded interval by QTRY_COMPARE() ensuring that all tasks have
finished, since otherwise QThreadPool::tryStart() fails in the next run.
Remove blacklisting for MSVC2012 since it is not compiler-specific.
Task-number: QTBUG-49654
Change-Id: If49b6eb9ef4da4ba2911839166c397d84c175e00
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@theqtcompany.com>
Introduce constants and make the interval for the 2nd thread a bit
longer.
Task-number: QTBUG-49653
Change-Id: I92ac0494ec6c9af5bde858007d08e26210215434
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
Introduce a base class for the threads that ensures termination in the
destructor to ensure all QThreads instantiated on the stack are terminated.
This should reduce crashes since the test thread classes have pointers
to stack variables of the test slots.
Set object names on the threads for better diagnostics.
Decouple wakeOne()/wakeAll() that impact each other via the static count
variables of the thread class by introducing a base class WakeThreadBase
keeping a pointer to an QAtomicInt count variable on the stack instead
(similar to the existing pointers to the mutexes, etc).
Task-number: QTBUG-49653
Change-Id: I73537386bf36019efa81e8e24ba9af92506f7794
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@theqtcompany.com>
If the future is finished when a watcher starts watching it, it is
perfectly reasonable for the watcher to get the finished message
promptly. If you pause the watcher before any message loops get to
run, the message presently won't get through until the watcher is
resumed, but there is no reason to guarantee that; indeed, one could
consider it somewhat perverse behavior.
So move the reportFinished() calls to after the pause()s.
Also eliminate a used-once local variable and use QTRY_VERIFY() in one
place where qWait() was used before.
Change-Id: I4bc6091fd7437a4d341be511b7a140f3d72d850e
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Attaching spies afterwards was provoking a warning during tests:
QFutureWatcher::connect: connecting after calling setFuture() is likely to produce race
Change-Id: I6ee8c3613cecebd1c69b0337139d8a19a33f4a11
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
It's accessed by QFutureWatcherBase::isFinished(), potentially before
anything has set it. It gets to be initially true until setFuture()
has given it us unfinished future and set it false.
Add a regression test for matching state in future and watcher.
Task-number: QTBUG-12358
Change-Id: Iae7bdaa434ab80f518afe4d7d55df99c391991a4
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@theqtcompany.com>
This test when running on Windows has a race condition since in qthread_win.cpp the
finished signal is emitted before everything is cleaned up.
Change-Id: I3c03d9a245e297e8f79b2be2c34398bf7bac9bae
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@theqtcompany.com>
The keyword no longer has a meaning for the new CI.
Change-Id: Ibcea4c7a82fb7f982cf4569fdff19f82066543d1
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@theqtcompany.com>
- Replace Q[TRY]_VERIFY(pointer == 0) by Q[TRY]_VERIFY(!pointer).
- Replace Q[TRY]_VERIFY(smartPointer == 0) by
Q[TRY]_VERIFY(smartPointer.isNull()).
- Replace Q[TRY]_VERIFY(a == b) by Q[TRY]_COMPARE(a, b) and
add casts where necessary. The values will then be logged
should a test fail.
Tests from corelib/tools were omitted in this change.
Change-Id: I4c8786d33fcf429d11b2b624c7cd89c28cadb518
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The function declaration has to be in the same ifdefs as the
implementation.
Change-Id: I78c5795baef4adba7439f66252819963db164759
Reviewed-by: Oliver Wolff <oliver.wolff@theqtcompany.com>
Preparing the replacement of Q[TRY]_VERIFY(a == b) by
Q[TRY]_COMPARE(a, b) for non-boolean types.
Change-Id: Iab6ec2f0a89a3adc79e18304573994965013dab5
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@theqtcompany.com>
The overload was added for NokiaX86 and RVCT and is bound for
removal.
Task-number: QTBUG-47260
Change-Id: Ic67cee8769847956e16cd0470ebcd663a9e98a40
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Since of Windows (Phone) 8.1 most of the desktop's thread functionality
is also available, so we might be able to share the code and get rid of
the extra implementation for WinRT.
Task-number: QTBUG-43837
Change-Id: I0ce907cd94899834527f88c70e1e395bafdb14b3
Reviewed-by: Maurice Kalinowski <maurice.kalinowski@theqtcompany.com>
All variants of the tests are timing out randomly on all platforms :(
Change-Id: I9244602a8d06fd07d3cc99b2fb8fdf6e07e92cf2
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
They didn't show up in the "old" CI runs because they usually pass the second
time they are executed - which the testrunner does. The new CI doesn't do that
anymore, instead we now mark those tests explicitly and will track their record
of passing and failing in the new metrics database.
Change-Id: Id34dd6f792f38995b07b6fec88f833df64de2f8b
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
