The use of ccache leads to QMAKE_CXX definitions of the form:
QMAKE_CXX = $${CCACHE} $${CROSS_COMPILE}g++
The previous test required QMAKE_CXX to be a single valid (absolute or
QMAKE_PATH_ENV-relative) path to an existing file, which was not
compatible with definitions of QMAKE_CXX like the one above.
Fix this by using only the first value in QMAKE_CXX, which usually
points to the compiler executable, or to the ccache executable in the
above case.
Task-number: QTBUG-47951
Change-Id: Iade3136f03493593b067fb7742fb997f92377425
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@theqtcompany.com>
automatically append the .exe extension. this is done unconditionally,
which means that providing it in the spec is wrong by definition.
don't use system("which") (which won't do what we want in a windows
shell), but scan PATH ourselves. as a bonus, this is also faster.
to avoid fetching and splitting the path multiple times, factor out a
function in spec_pre.prf.
Change-Id: I95f0fa285c158b347d45422111f91540e3a595fd
Reviewed-by: Jochen Seemann <seemann.jochen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Schulz <david.schulz@theqtcompany.com>
Commit 8b822825c5 introduced the
/get version but used the wrong variable name. Fix it by using
QT_HOST_DATA.
Change-Id: Ia4759b8c6ff2de9726f3aebae2f2f39c6644d4ec
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@nokia.com>
this cleans up a lot of hacks supporting the build of qt, including the
last bits of $QTDIR.
Change-Id: Id119886ed8097967dad6cf86ebd4e71d90c42841
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@nokia.com>
Re-enable checking if the compiler is in the path. The previous
commit dealt with a user/spec author not setting CROSS_COMPILE and
then picking up the host g++. Re-add the 'which' check, but put it
after the sanity check for the CROSS_COMPILE variable. This check
assumes that QMAKE_CXX is of the form "${CROSS_COMPILE}g++".
Change-Id: I54f7e058a75d26d73eca5a860946a6854ce91d67
Reviewed-by: Girish Ramakrishnan <girish.1.ramakrishnan@nokia.com>
QMAKE_CXX is initialized by default to gcc. As a result,
'which $QMAKE_CXX' always succeeds.
This change removes the 'which' check and makes it explicit
that CROSS_COMPILE is a mandatory option to -device mkspecs.
Change-Id: Icefa9d14fc24086a60c9108ff7d9d16fd9990995
Done-with: Johannes Zellner
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@nokia.com>
The current approach of forcing people to pass the fully qualified prefix
of their toolchain to the configure script is verbose and something of a
chore for people who use the same toolchain to target several devices.
This allows you to set a single toolchain for use with all Qt targets via:
qmake -set CROSS_COMPILE foo
You can still explicitly override this toolchain, as originally mandated,
with the configure time device-option arguments.
Change-Id: Ibd3d940bb08fa09499533f9c661557e337a8421a
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@nokia.com>
A common issue for our users is that they do not provide the path
to their cross compiler or don't have it in their $PATH. Introduce
a qmake testFunction to sanity check the presence of the compiler.
Change-Id: I7d41db139d2a9c67334908b96e9f5e8f996426f6
Reviewed-by: Girish Ramakrishnan <girish.1.ramakrishnan@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@nokia.com>
For some reference platforms and SDKs we will need to pass in
extra paths. Currently users have to modify the mkspec to adjust
paths or set environment variables that will be picked up.
This change introduces the -device <name> and -device-option
<key=value> option. The key value pairs will be written to a
qdevice.pri and can be used by the qmake.conf of the device spec.
The reason to not save the key value pairs in qconfig.pri is
becase of the fact that the device spec loads the qdevice.pri
earlier than the qconfig.pri. qdevice.pri allows the mkspec
to set the compiler flags and qconfig.pri allows configure to
add to those compiler flags.
Done-with: Holger Freyther
Change-Id: I931a197b8be72397e1eedfee09502eefc01c9d4f
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Girish Ramakrishnan <girish.1.ramakrishnan@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Zellner <johannes.zellner@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Carr <donald.carr@nokia.com>
