This amends commit 68f19fb630 to only
consume one 't' from the format string, to match qlocale.cpp's
serialization of time-zone specifiers, which only consumes one, so
will repeat the time-zone specifier as many times as unquoted t
appears in the format. It's hard to imagine why anyone would want this
behavior, but it's what our serialization has always done and parsing
should match serialization.
Add test-cases for double time-zone specifier.
Delete a lie in the process.
Task-number: QTBUG-95966
Change-Id: I574896040a74085dee89a4fefd8384be44ad827b
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
It is no longer handled separately from Android.
This effectively reverts commit 6d50f746fe
Change-Id: Ic2d75b8c5a09895810913311ab2fe3355d4d2983
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
The existing a, ap, A and AP specifiers all force the case of the
formatted am/pm indicator. The indicators returned by QLocale's
amText() and pmText() methods are those given in CLDR, with no case
coercion. Application writers may reasonably want these strings used
verbatim, rather than having to chose a case and impose it on the
locale's indicators, in defiance of national custom. For example,
while en_US uses upper-case indicators by default, cs_CZ uses
lower-case ones. An application author writing a time format has been
forced to chose which of these locales to be wrong in.
Add support for aP and Ap specifiers, whose mixed case indicates that
the locale's case is to be respected. Amend an existing test-case of
tst_QLocale's formatDateTime() that used Ap (expecting, of course, an
upper-case indicator followed by a stray p) to now expect the
locale-appropriate-cased indicator. Extend formatTime() to test cases
using aP and Ap, to illustrate the difference between en_US and cs_CZ.
Rework QDateTimeParser to also support the new format specifier. This
required expanding its Case enum, used by the getAmPmText() method,
which was formerly shared with QDateTimeEditPrivate; however, as that
class no longer makes any reference to this method, it and the enum
can be made private, allowing a systematic clean-up of their use.
Added test-cases for both serialization and parsing; and amended some
existing parsing tests to verify am/pm indicators are matched
case-insensitively.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][Important Behavior Changes] Time formats used by
QLocale, QTime and QDateTime's parsing and serialization now recognize
'aP' and 'Ap' format specifiers to obtain an AM/PM indicator, using
the locale-appropriate case for the indicator, where previously the
author of a time format had to pick a case that might conflict with
the user's locale. For QTime and QDateTime the locale is always C,
whose indicators are uppercase. For QLocale, the case will now match
that of amText() or pmText(). Previously, 'aP' would have been read as
a lower-case indicator followed by a 'P' and 'Ap' as an upper-case
indicator followed by a 'p'. The 'P' or 'p' will now be treated as
part of the format specifier: if the prior behavior is desired, either
use 'APp' or 'apP' as format specifier or quote the 'p' or 'P' in the
format. The prior 'a', 'ap', 'A' and 'AP' specifiers are otherwise
unaffected.
Fixes: QTBUG-95790
Change-Id: I26603f70f068e132b5c6aa63214ac8c1774ec913
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Various QDateTime tests relating to transitions
* used a nomenclature that made them confusing to thing about; and
* expected identically-initiallized variables to behave differently.
The latter, naturally, lead to "expected fail" tests.
Rewrote the tests to get the date-times they want to test at by means
that avoid the ambiguities inherent in QDateTime's lack of a way to
distinguish the two passes through the repeated hour in a fall-back
(QTBUG-79923) and added commented-out tests indicating what should be
true once that ambiguity is resolved. Verified the DST status is as
expected in the cases where that's the correct distinction between
date-times with the same date and time. Renamed various things to
(hopefully) make them more intelligible.
In the process, purged some leading 0s from numbers in code.
Fixes: QTBUG-68936
Change-Id: Id7a348995238b70dcb81a96edb8a3fa5315f86fa
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
In my prior attempt to handle the last second of 1969, I forgot that
the QTime we're describing is a local time, so whether *it* thinks
we're at the last second of the day is beside the point. Fortunately,
preceding second should get -2 as return if mktime()'s initial -1
actually meant the last second of 1969, so we can test via that, after
a cheap pre-test to save doing this too often (albeit we only even
attempt the check if mktime() returned -1 in any case).
Restructured qt_mktime() in the process to deal with the error case's
early return promptly instead of doing it in an else clause. Also
repackage the calls to mktime to isolate various quirks and simplify
the logic in qt_mktime(). This also prepares for setting tm_isdst as a
hint when we know when we came from, in massageAdjustedDateTime().
Refined one test, added two more test cases. These didn't fail before
this fix, but a judiciously-placed qDebug() in testing revealed that
localMSecsToEpochMSecs() resorted to its fall-back handling - as if
the date-time were outside the time_t range - due to qt_mktime()
failing, for these test-cases (and several others). This fix evades
that fall-back behavior; a judiciously-placed qDebug() shows none of
our test-cases now fail callMkTime().
Change-Id: I11aa5015191dc4a565c28482307f7bc341c207e7
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
In setMSecsSinceEpoch(), the CET end-of-time is invalid anyway, so a
whole block (rather than just one sub-test of it) was irrelevant for
the max-qint64 test case (aside from verifying cet *is* invalid).
Split out to a separate test the part of a data-driven test that was
the same for all data rows. Reworked several ill-advised ways to use
QSKIP().
Change-Id: If757d3e722c81fc42a87256125ceef605b6bfb64
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
When adding an offset from UTC, arithmetic may overflow. Likewise
when combining a date and time (that have been offset for UTC). Also
check the return from epochMSecsToLocalTime(), as it can fail; and pay
attention to the status stored by setDateTime(), to notice when it
hits an overflow. Fixed some tests that only passed because we
neglected these checks. Extended a test to check we detect overflow in
a couple of cases close to the extremes.
Change-Id: I127a670302f94a07bb9b087b1b9c608b7c08785c
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Øystein Heskestad <oystein.heskestad@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
QDateTime has long followed a convention of ignoring what it knows
about time-zone transitions before the epoch. This produces unhelpful
artefacts (such as an ahistorical spring-forward skipping the first
hour of 1970 in Europe/London, which was in permanent DST at the time)
and complicates the code. It documented that DST transitions were
ignored, but in fact ignored all transitions prior to 1970 and simply
assumed that the current time-zone properties (half a century later)
applied to all times before 1970.
This appears to be based on the fact that the MS APIs using time_t all
limit their range to after 1970. Given that we have to resort to
"other means" to deal with times after the end of time_t, when it's
only 32-bit (and after year 3000, on MS systems), we have the means in
place to handle times outside the range supported by the system APIs,
so have no need to mimic this restriction. (Those means are not as
robust as we might want, but they are less bad than assuming that the
present zone properites were always in effect prior to 1970.) On
macOS, the time_t functions only reach back to the start of 1900; it
reaches to the end of its time_t range and Linux covers the whole
range. Given this variety, the range is now auto-detected the first
time it is needed (based on some quick and dirty heuristics).
Various CET-specific tests now need adjustments in tests of times
before the introduction of time-zones (when they are in fact on LMT,
not CET). The systemZone() test of QTimeZone can now restore its
pre-zone test cases. Various comments on tests needed updates.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QDateTime] Available time-zone information is now
used to its full extent, where previously QDateTime used LocalTime's
current standard time for all dates before 1970. Where we have
time-zone information, it is considered reliable, so we use it. This
changes the "best efforts" used for times outside the range supported
by the system APIs, in most cases giving less misleading results.
Fixes: QTBUG-80421
Change-Id: I7b1df7622dd9be244b0238ed9c08845fb5b32215
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Previously, if multiplication overflowed when trying to set the date
and time of a formerly short-form QDateTime, its status didn't get set
to reflect the failed validity check. Added a test that now correctly
detects that it's produced an invalid date-time on overflow, where
previously it produced a wrong valid date-time.
Change-Id: Id46ca34d1e32e9b9b0630f3723cefd1c13b5761e
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This reverts commit ec8808c302 but
retains its test, as the problem it fixed is now solved by having the
TZ backend validate the ID it's passed, so that it now only accepts
valid POSIX zone-descriptions and valid IANA IDs. The former were
being excluded by this check.
Amended a POSIX test to fail with the check in place; it passes now.
Change-Id: I0d5e8c6e0a315ac2509f3d23bebb52aede8f79d0
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Löhning <robert.loehning@qt.io>
Previously, an apparent POSIX rule would be saved and any defects in
it would only be discovered when trying to use it to generate
transitions. Instead, check that it has the right form during the
initial parsing of its data.
In the process, since checking for DST in the process is trivial,
implement a long-standing TODO to cache hasDaylightTime()'s
answer. The array it scanned was in any case being scanned during
construction, so detecting DST in init()'s scan is trivial; and its
failure to check the POSIX rule mean it failed to notice when zones
entirely specified by a POSIX rule have DST.
Adapt a test using a POSIX-only rule to verify it does know the zone
has DST; it did not, before this change.
Change-Id: I690c013d3331600f7348dae61c35d41e5599da70
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The description necessarily has fake transitions at start and end of
the year, potentially outside the year. These transitions should not
be reported by QTzTimeZonePrivate as transitions, although its data()
must find a "transition" whose data it can use (as in the permanent
standard time case, which could potentially be represented the same
way, although there's a saner way to do so, that the code already
handles) to report the zone's properties.
In the process, fix (and make more straightforward) the convoluted
decision-making code that was deciding which transitions to include in
the returned list. It was assuming invalidMSecs() would be set as the
atMSecsSinceEpoch of a transition, although this is computed in a way
that makes that value most unlikely, even when the result is invalid.
It also rather confusingly mixed < 0 tests as tests for overflow with
the one < 0 test that's about ignoring DST before 1970. Also added
comments to clarify some of what's going on there.
Expanded a recently-added test of a permanent DST zone to verify this
now works correctly.
Change-Id: Ia8d98f433fb1e479dba5479220a62196c30f0244
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
There are two formats for such fields: one with a J prefix on a number
in the range 1 to 365, the other with no prefix and a range from 0 to
365. The code mistakenly treated the latter as if its range were from
1 to 366. The J-form doesn't count Feb 29th, so March always starts on
day 60; the code tried to take that into account, but adjusted in the
wrong direction (and this mislead me, in a recent partial fix, into a
fence-post error).
Add a test-case based on the Africa/Casablanca POSIX rule seen on RHEL
8.2, which tripped over the off-by-one error without a J prefix. This
incidentally also tests the J case.
Change-Id: I692ca511e5c960f91a6c21073d3b2f037f5e445f
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
A POSIX rule's transition time is allowed an hour in the range from
-137 to 137; in particular, a negative hour is allowed, and used by
some Greenland zones using Europe's time-of-transition which, as they
are more than two hours west of Greenwich, happens before midnight.
This means the time of transition can't be represented by a QTime(),
so propagate the int that represents it to the code that consumes it;
and treat parsing failure as an error rather than "correcting" it - if
the transition time is given, it must be valid.
Changed tst_QTimeZone::isTimeZoneIdAvailable()'s verification of
validity to report the name of the zone it thought was invalid.
(A later change, validating POSIX rules, caued this to fail for
America/Nuuk without the present fix.)
Change-Id: I5c9127ac34d878554dd0aca1c1c7338c7e0e1c28
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
If the ID isn't even valid, don't waste cycles trying to make sense of
it as identifying a time-zone.
Add test of an invalid ID that provoked an integer overflow on trying
to parse it as a POSIX zone specification.
Fixes: QTBUG-92842
Change-Id: Ib80bbb88c11c0484ce0358acabbdc25c5bd8e0b3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
At least some modern 64-bit systems have widened time_t to 64 bits
fixing the "Unix time" problem. (This is even the default on MS-Win,
although the system functions artificially limit the accepted range to
1970 through 3000.) Even the 32-bit range extends into January 2038
but the code was artificially cutting this off at the end of 2037.
This is a preparation for using the same also all the way back to the
start of time_t.
In the process, simplify and tidy up the logic of the existing code,
update the docs (this includes correcting some misinformation) and
revise some tests.
Fixes: QTBUG-73225
Change-Id: Ib8001b5a982386c747eda3dea2b5a26eedd499ad
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
If the backends run into an error in computing the offset, they return
INT_MIN; but they are valled via the front-end, which returns zero
when the zone is invalid. So treat INT_MIN returns from the backend
the same as the case of being invalid.
Change-Id: Ic3c4dfe964dbfba4030c770213eca8a63e84736d
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The use of "Country" is misleading as some entries in the enumeration
are not countries (eg, HongKong), for all that most are. The Unicode
Consortium's Common Locale Data Repository (CLDR, from which QLocale's
data is taken) calls these territories, so introduce territory-based
names and prepare to deprecate the country-based ones in due course.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QLocale] QLocale now has Territory as an alias for
its Country enumeration, and associated territory-based names to match
its country-named methods, to better match the usage in relevant
standards. The country-based names shall in due course be deprecated
in favor of the territory-based names.
Fixes: QTBUG-91686
Change-Id: Ia1ae1ad7323867016186fb775c9600cd5113aa42
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The POSIX rule parser used by QTzTimeZonePrivate recklessly assumed
that, if splitting the rule on a dot produced more than one part, it
necessarily produced at least three. That's true for well-formed POSIX
rules, but we should catch the case of malformed rules.
Likewise, when calculating the dates of transitions, splitting the
date rule on dots might produce too few fragments; and the fragments
might not parse as valid numbers, or might be out of range for their
respective fields in a date. Check all these cases, too.
Added a test that crashed previously. Changed
QTimeZone::offsetFromUtc() so that its "return zero on invalid"
applies also to the case where the backend returns invalid, in
support of this.
Fixes: QTBUG-92808
Pick-to: 6.1 6.1.0 6.0 5.15
Change-Id: Ica383a7a987465483341bdef8dcfd42edb6b43d6
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Löhning <robert.loehning@qt.io>
Test we get the same starts of various days. Some coming changes shall
break some of these, but they should all be back to working by the
time we're taking account of DST before 1970 as well as after.
The first two or three test-cases work by accident in most zones, at
present, due to the zone-based code-path ignoring the LMT period
before the zone's first transition; but Europe/Helsinki had a renaming
transition in 1878, so does see its pre-zone offset between then and
the switch to UTC+2 in 1921, leading to failures in exactly the zone
Coin tests. So suppress these three test-cases pending later fixes.
On Windows, the next text (still pre-epoch) gets bogus zone data for
its LocalTime, so suppress that likewise.
Task-number: QTBUG-80421
Change-Id: I2264e0e436d92112b03264faa410e30057b8f73b
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
The prior tst_QDateTime::setMSecsSinceEpoch(-1) testcase was the last
millisecond of 1969; which (deep in the relevant function) actually
uses time_t 0 (with the -1 ms offset taken aside to be put back
later); so add the matching -1 second test. At the same time, add +1ms
and +1s checks for symmetry.
Change-Id: Ib487305f6ad81b55563ea59926cae13fb1fde592
Reviewed-by: Andreas Buhr <andreas.buhr@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
In QTimeZonePrivate::dataForLocalTime(), mistrust the Android
backend's hasDaylightTime(), as it has a comment saying it only knows
about future transitions, not past. This caller of it really needs to
query "has ever had a transition", which this doesn't answer. Many
zones that have no plans for future transitions have had transitions
in the past; these were failing the transitionEachZone() test.
In the process, refine the test itself, making sure we catch some
quirk cases that shouldn't arise and making the debug message on
failure more informative (while eliding the zone name, as this is part
of the test name anyway, so added to the output by qDebug() itself).
Fixes: QTBUG-69131
Change-Id: I88a0528182c247acb8b6327b40516178e455bcc0
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
The QTimeZone tests have some helper functions to test details of a
QTZP instance; these use QCOMPARE(), so may return early on failure.
The callers then need to notice the failure and, in their turn, also
return.
Change-Id: I0a188e9641ced70c9ffedd95e91f39681fad768a
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Its back-end lacks transition data, so the test can't possibly
succeed. Make the skip conditional on the tested zone having
transitions, so that the test will come back into play if we ever gain
support for transitions on Android.
Fixes: QTBUG-69129
Change-Id: Ie4f96601b8b18cd496efbde7cf2557875cf3c1c9
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Apparently we used to have (back in 2007, only on Windows,
incompatibly with what we were then using on Unix) a TextDate format
(only for QDateTime, QDate used what it still uses) that put the
day-of-month number, with a dot after it, before the month's short
name. We have retained parsing of this format, on all platforms, ever
since.
It no longer matches the format we now use (since 5.2, in 2013, commit
61b56a89a1, which harmonised the format
with Unix and QDate); now seems like a good time to stop complicating
our parser for its sake.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QDateTime] The parsing of Qt::TextDate in
QDateTime::fromString() no longer supports the old TextDate format
used (only) on Windows by Qt < 5.2 ("ddd d. MMM yyyy" with an
"HH:mm:ss" time either appended or inserted before "yyyy").
Change-Id: I73a798ab78f187543e415119cc4a11f1cfd73820
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Since fromString() can't parse the (ambiguous at the best of times;
also backend-dependent and thus potentially system-locale-dependent)
abbreviations currently produced (since 5.9) and can parse UTC-based
offsets, the OffsetName of the zone is a more robust format for the
zone-suffix. This also makes it possible to consistently use the C
locale, compatibly with everything else about post-6.0 date-time
serialization.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QDateTime] When spec is Qt::TimeZone, the
offset-suffix now used for the toString(Qt::TextDate) format is now a
UTC-based offset string, compatible with the parsing (now) supported
by fromString(). The zone-abbreviation suffix in use since 5.9 was not
parseable.
Change-Id: I4024ae87980c6d3590c68a67b8d1c8f433e36855
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
There are GMT-offset zones whose convention for the sign of the offset
is the reverse of what we are (still) using, which is the usual
convention for UTC-offset zone: for example, the Olson Database's
Etc/GMT+3 has offset -3 hours in the UTC-based system we use, so we
give it suffix GMT-0300. The UTC-based suffix is also what we use as
the abbreviation for OffsetFromUTC() in toString().
For now this only adds support for parsing a planned future form: the
old form using GMT is retained, to give client code some chance to
prepare for a backwards-compatible transition. Although the GMT prefix
is matched case-insensitively, only match UTC if fully upper-case;
there is no meaningful precedent for case-insensitive usage here.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QDateTime] The Qt::TextDate format now recognizes
UTC-based offset suffixes in addition to suffixes based on the
deprecated alias GMT. This prepares for toString() to use such
UTC-based suffixes for time-zones (fromString() cannot parse the
present abbreviation suffix). A future release of Qt shall use
UTC-based suffixes in place of the present GMT-based suffixes (which
conflict with GMT-based IANA zone names) for Qt::LocalTime and
Qt::OffsetFromUTC time-specs. Client code is encouraged to use and
recognize UTC-based zone suffixes in preparation for that transition,
unless compatibility with versions before 6.2 is required.
Change-Id: I5a42a488f1232a30f4b427b7954759283423b9b3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Instead of an XFAIL, actually test what we expect will happen for the
test, namely that the milliseconds will be lost. In the process,
verify that milliseconds since epoch also matches what was expected,
change an "expecting empty" condition to check for the "invalid"
test-case to which it's actually relevant and note that this test-case
shall need amended when we update our ISODate support to the 2019
update, which extends the year range.
Task-number: QTBUG-56552
Pick-to: 6.1 6.0 5.15
Change-Id: I680aa31ee0dcc8fadabb5d4cd6c083a8afd48573
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The test verified that a LocalTime's time since Epoch changes when the
system time-zone changes. This works when the QDateTime object is in
short form and recomputes its offset from UTC every time it is needed,
but fails with a pimpled QDateTime, as this caches its offset from UTC
when it is created, saving the recomputation which - in the far more
usual case where the system time-zone does not change in the lifetime
of a QDateTime object - would normally produce the same result.
Changed the test to use a newly-created QDateTime constructed with the
same parameters, which doesn't have the cached out-of-date knowledge
of its zone offset. Removed the XFAIL. Made the test data-driven and
added test-cases: one so close to the Epoch that it should be short
even on 32-bit systems, one so far that it's pimpled even on 64-bit
systems (used in reproducing the issue in order to debug it).
This then revealed that Android 5 doesn't seem to support the POSIX
zone IDs used by this test, so it now verifies that LocalTime has the
expected offset from UTC after zone changes, QSKIP()ping if not.
Documented that the behavior of LocalTime is undefined after a change
to the system time-zone. Cleaned up the existing doc of Qt::TimeSpec
in the process.
Fixes: QTBUG-89889
Pick-to: 6.1 6.0 5.15
Change-Id: I1058f47a1ff3ee1c326f3579ac80bd8bab242e28
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Previously the only test was that it produced no warnings,
if anyone paused to read the output to notice them.
Change-Id: I225ca99c7ec316186702c0fdb355585374c014a4
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Amend ac970d48fd and use
QEXPECT_FAILURE for systemTimeZone test on 32bit systems.
Task-number: QTBUG-89889
Change-Id: I0eed35df871c69a20bcd7c544fc0e9a48dd8db7b
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Dating from the origins of our support for the zoneinfo file format,
the mapping of POSIX's day-numbering (0 = Sunday through 6 = Saturday,
see [*]) to Qt's (1 = Monday through 7 = Sunday) was done by mapping 0
to 1, when it should have been 7.
[*] http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/TZ-Variable.html
Corrected a QTimeZone test that trusted the results it got without
checking which day of the week those were: they were all Mondays.
Verified that the corrected dates are in fact Sundays.
Checked the zone abbreviations, too.
Fixes: QTBUG-90553
Pick-to: 6.0 5.15
Change-Id: I84b4b14f9892ff687918cd3c42c7c9807e45313c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
It used QString.compare() and assumed it was returning a bool true on
equality, when it actually returns an int that compares to 0 as the
given strings compare. So it should use compare() == 0.
This fixes several of QTimeZone's blacklisted tests on Android and a
crasher, which we dodged with a QSKIP. Added an id-comparison to a
test. Gave two local variables more informative names, made an early
return into a QSKIP so it explains itself.
Fixes: QTBUG-89905
Fixes: QTBUG-69122
Fixes: QTBUG-69132
Fixes: QTBUG-87435
Pick-to: 6.0 5.15
Change-Id: Icf18ed5a810143d6e65d36e34a70e82faac10b8e
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
When creating a time-zone from a UTC+offset name that isn't known to
the system, QTimeZone (since the fix to QTBUG-77738 in 5.15.0) falls
back to constructing a suitable UTC-offset backend; however, the id of
this is not guaranteed to match the id passed in to the constructor.
In all other cases, the id of a QTimeZone does match the id passed to
its constructor.
Some utcOffsetId testcases had different id() than the id passed to
the constructor, due to mismatches where a zone was constructed using
the fall-back but the generated id included its minutes (as :00) or
omitted its seconds. The omission of seconds is clearly a bug, but we
also don't want to include :00 for seconds when it's not needed. So
change QTimeZonePrivate::isoOffsetFormat() to accept a
QTimeZone::NameType to configure how much we include in an id. Its
callers other than the relevant constructor (from offset) still get
minutes, even when :00, but will also get seconds added if that isn't
zero; and the constructor from offset now gets the short form obtained
by omitting all trailing zeros.
Since all valid whole-hour offset names that do include :00 for the
minutes field are in fact known standard offset names, the elision of
minutes will only affect zones created by ID in the case of a
whole-hour offset given without :00 minutes specifier, so these shall
necessarily in fact get the ID passed to the constructor. Creating by
UTC-offset with a name that specifies zero seconds will result in a
QTimeZone instance whose id() differs from what was passed to its
constructor (eliding the :00 seconds and potentially also minutes, if
also zero) but this should be the only case where a QTimeZone's id
doesn't match the one passed to the constructor, when constructed by
id.
Fixed inconsistency between the offset-constructor's declaration
(taking offset as int) and definition (taking qint32) in the process.
Added an id check to the utcOffsetId() testcase. Amended two tests of
offset-derived time-zones' IDs, added comments to make clear how one
of those differs from a matching standard name test and converted two
uses of QCOMPARE(, true) to QVERIFY().
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QTimeZone] QTimeZone instances created by offset
from UTC (in seconds) shall now only include minutes in their ID when
the offset is not a whole number of hours. They shall also include the
seconds in their ID when the offset is not a whole number of minutes.
Pick-to: 6.0 5.15
Task-number: QTBUG-87435
Change-Id: I610e0a78e2aca51e12bfe003497434a998e93dc7
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Remove the qmake project files for most of Qt.
Leave the qmake project files for examples, because we still test those
in the CI to ensure qmake does not regress.
Also leave the qmake project files for utils and other minor parts that
lack CMake project files.
Task-number: QTBUG-88742
Change-Id: I6cdf059e6204816f617f9624f3ea9822703f73cc
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Koehne <kai.koehne@qt.io>
systemTimeZoneChange() fails also on 32bit QEMU ARMv7.
Task-number: QTBUG-87663
Change-Id: I5c006a8637edff0a95b1f9b76d2c58006aeae6d6
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
In 1947, Germany had not only a summer time but also a
"Hochsommerzeit", a high summer time. This patch adds a test
creating a QDateTime in the time gap at the beginning of this
Hochsommerzeit on May 11, 1947.
Pick-to: 6.0
Change-Id: Ib81a23914965f092c3e3195e4c7258e5a4e0b30e
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Complete search and replace of QtTest and QtTest/QtTest with QTest, as
QtTest includes the whole module. Replace all such instances with
correct header includes. See Jira task for more discussion.
Fixes: QTBUG-88831
Change-Id: I981cfae18a1cabcabcabee376016b086d9d01f44
Pick-to: 6.0
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Historic QDateTime behavior when being asked to create a
QDateTime in the DST gap was to interpret the given date
as if it was in the time before that gap, mapping it to a point
in time after the gap. This has changed with
a04411119e .
Since then, the given date is interpreted as if it was in the
time after the gap, thus being mapped to a point in time
before the gap.
This patch restores the historic behavior.
This was not caught by Coin because machines ran in timezone
"Atlantic/Reykjavik" which does not have DST since 1967.
This patch changes tests to always run in "Europe/Oslo".
Driveby: Test function "findSpring" did some operations in
local time, even though being asked to work in a specific
time zone. Fixed that.
Fixes: QTBUG-86960
Fixes: QTBUG-89208
Pick-to: 6.0 5.15
Change-Id: Iecce5898bf9711a10e7dfc0a25e4bbeaed1c8ade
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Added tests for aliases and various calendar properties, ensured
dateToJulianDay()'s invalid date branch is exercised. Corrected
assertion when constructing from system and asserted calendarSystem()
is as expected.
Pick-to: 5.15
Task-number: QTBUG-88183
Change-Id: I510afcb5d9d115f68148d1f679f3224d712f92f4
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Coverage analysis showed that QCalendar::YearMonthDate was not
rigorously tested. This patch adds a unit test.
Pick-to: 6.0
Change-Id: I0af485d13c4883764b61ea1e35455905cc77b966
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
We want to re-enable Android tests in QTQAINFRA-3867. However,
many tests are failing already preventing that from happening.
QTBUG-87025 is currently keeping track (links) to all of those
failing tests.
The current proposal is to hide those failing tests, and enable
Android test running in COIN for other tests. After, that try
to fix them one by one, and at the same time we can make sure
no more failing tests go unnoticed.
Task-number: QTBUG-87025
Change-Id: Ic1fe9fdd167cbcfd99efce9a09c69c344a36bbe4
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
The documentation states that QDate::fromString() accepts negative
year numbers, but it did not. This patch adds support for negative
year numbers to QDate::fromString() and corresponding unit tests.
Furthermore, tests are added for positive signs (+) in date strings.
Fixes: QTBUG-84334
Task-number: QTBUG-84349
Change-Id: I575291e7b8317055d4bb530011d7b10c9cd37ae1
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
So far, the internals of QDateTimeParser and especially the handling
of 'Intermediate' values were only tested implicitly by
tst_qdatetimeedit. 'Intermediate' values are values which
are not valid according to the specified format, but could
become valid by adding more characters.
This patch adds unit tests which tests parsing of
these intermediate values directly.
These tests will help implement handling of negative
year numbers, where additional complications arise
because of possible ambiguities between the minus sign '-'
and the separator '-'.
Task-number: QTBUG-84334
Change-Id: Ia6ba08df198288b8b11d3b2d2052c194f04fe8a1
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
The qdatetimeparser was not tested explicitly so far, but only
implicitly in tst_qdate / tst_qdatetime / tst_qdatetimeedit etc.
This made it difficult to test some corner cases, especially in the
context of unfinished dates, i.e. dates which are invalid, but could
become valid by adding more characters. This is used to validate
user input in qdatetimeedit.
Task-number: QTBUG-84334
Change-Id: I27202849abb1b7cad96d3e25f7ac81ce85272b2a
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
RFC2822 requires times to be in the format 'HH:mm' or 'HH:mm:ss'.
We did not have unit tests to check that malformed RFC2822
dates are rejected. This patch adds such unit tests for
truncated hours/minutes/seconds.
Change-Id: Id5b9390112e633e617722439ad59439e6aeba841
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
