These were now always defined, hence redundant.
Leave the #define in place so that we can verify we actually do always
define it, in a #else of an existing #if check on it.
Change-Id: Iea4c3dbc8f9982268bcf81da5ef17fe2ebf5c462
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
QTime() is invalid. Only the seconds and milliseconds are optional,
for valid times. Use startOfDay() for zoned times, QTime(0, 0) for
fixed-offset ones.
Change-Id: I3b65d5c3733ac83dc3a6c214859c3f56a480bb94
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Nothing used defDateTime(), nothing but it used defTime(). The only
other use of defDate() were from one test, which might as well make it
a local variable.
QDateTime's default is invalid, making invalidDateTime() redundant,
and the invalidDate() and invalidTime() it called had no other users.
Change-Id: I0e07ee58478bfe8ba680eafb52e2f73a962edd33
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
As per ### Qt6 comment. Also rename the LibraryLocation enum
to LibraryPath.
Change-Id: I556025a19c5bcdf2ff52598eaba32269522d4128
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
We were starting to run out of space for builtin core types.
Remap the type id's to create lots of additional space.
We now reserve the first 64k id's for Qt, and have 16k id's for
Qt Core. That should hopfully be enough for a while ;-)
Fixes: QTBUG-85914
Change-Id: I0dab6bf23652e46a9557d9b38af7990b68c572b6
Reviewed-by: Alex Blasche <alexander.blasche@qt.io>
They were disabled in ad0e3e26fa,
but that was probably accidental.
Change-Id: Ia9cbccfbeecfe84768c3465f5699ed44b7f932a5
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
Provide functionality to add and remove values, so that you can use a
sequential iterable as stack or queue if the underlying container
supports this. To this end, provide a way to specify whether the
value should be added or removed at the beginning or the end of the
iterable.
Change-Id: If63d302f3ca085e56d601116ce4dfaa6b94a0c4f
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
For completeness' sake we should expose this. The iterators provided by
QIterable and friends will check the category at runtime, and should give
sensible feedback.
Change-Id: I778894f340c862f79a18c6c5607bcbba98dd7598
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Test data for QDateTime unit tests was constructed in system's local
time, which made unit test outcome dependent on the time zone of the
system running the tests.
This led to failing unit tests on systems with libc6 version
2.31 or newer. A QDateTime in a timezone, which has daylight saving
time, was created and then used in Hawaii's time zone,which has no
daylight saving time. Newer glibc checks this and returns errors.
This patch changes the behavior to create the test data in a
specified time zone setting.
Task-number: QTBUG-80441
Change-Id: I0330b647fa011be99141dde09001ff2d58bd3a5f
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
This reverts commit f51b690e91.
The commit made all animation tests in qtdeclarative on macOS
flaky.
Change-Id: I4ccaa879df7e2ba7e253657de01cbabc9b2c655f
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
This is so that they are in line with the "value_type" usually found in
containers. Associative containers have "key_type" and "mapped_type" and
we will use those names for access to elements in QMetaAssociation.
Using "value" as name for sequential containers improves consistency.
Change-Id: I628b7e1446bb2d56843b843bca72d279a6b247e6
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Instead of doing string formating first and then using QTest::newRow,
we can do both at the same time using QTest::addRow
Change-Id: Ia5c90eb705a806e37b96a1fa174a6557f91bee6d
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
To not have to bother with encodings, a few QStrings are changed
to QByteArrays. This way, a few calls to QString::fromLatin1 and
to QString::toLocal8Bit can be removed
Change-Id: Ia0cf27fc2a86f9842ed0f3ebe47b050bb8a3f4e6
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Remove around 1000 compiler warnings about missing overrides
in our auto tests.
This significantly reduce the compiler warning noise in our auto
tests, so that one can actually better see the real problems
inbetween.
Change-Id: Id0c04dba43fcaf55d8cd2b5c6697358857c31bf9
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Looks this is redundant in fact and unneeded. The check can never be
evaluated to true, since if so, it would mean it had failed in the
previous iteration, in which we already handled the exit from the loop.
Fixed also some comments.
Task-number: QTBUG-83419
Change-Id: I4fe56bfac39cd58b1166967f3ccb80cdff882748
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
The removal of the QProcess::start(QString, OpenMode) leads to more
porting work than anticipated. A call like
QProcess p;
p.start(cmdline);
must be transformed in the following cumbersome way:
QProcess p;
QStringList args = QProcess::splitCommand(cmdline);
QString program = args.takeFirst();
p.start(program, args);
This patch revives QProcess::start(QString, OpenMode) and renames it to
QProcess::startCommand. This is still source-incompatible, but the
transformation is much simpler:
QProcess p;
p.startCommand(cmdline);
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QProcess] Added QProcess::startCommand(QString,
OpenMode) as replacement for the removed QProcess::start(QString,
OpenMode).
Change-Id: I5499bbb39a025e115042c43a4cc63affddae585c
Reviewed-by: hjk <hjk@qt.io>
Changed QString to use implicit element reserved by QArrayData
Task-number: QTBUG-84320
Change-Id: If517500b3f0e71bb8d2989c64815a634aa8dd554
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
QDate was changed to consistently use the C local in
serialization and parsing in git commit
5ba66c5622.
This commit reflects this change in the unit tests.
Task-number: QTBUG-80441
Change-Id: Ib21a215ef0e36c9eaa2c161b92c6877a50ae6f06
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Updated moveNonPod function to behave correctly under
exceptions being thrown. This is the version that was implemented
at some point but then got changed prior to merge. Added tests for
moveInGrowthDirection (which uses moveNonPod in general case) to
verify that range movements are correctly done
Updated QCommonArrayOps access modifier from private to protected
to allow testing of internal stuff by subclassing
Task-number: QTBUG-84320
Change-Id: Idb994a72ee601762e32248670cdc7819aaca0088
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Scoped GrowsBackwards-optimized erase to only be applied
when erase starts at the beginning of the element range.
In other cases, old "left-shifting" erase is used to align
with std::vector::erase invalidation policy
Task-number: QTBUG-84320
Change-Id: I2e7f3b96b056bc371119eb2d36cc7c74af52c394
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Before, we used not so accurate QTest::qWait(50)
to measure the accuracy of more precise timer's interval.
In addition, the checked range for remainingTime (50, 200)
was probably wrong, since by definition it couldn't be more than 150,
as we started the timer with interval of 200 and waited at least 50.
In this fix we have additional "tester" timer to measure remainingTime
of "tested" timer. The "tester" is a singleShot timer with interval of
50, and is started together with "tested" timer. Whenever the "tested"
timer timeouts, it restarts the "tester" timer - this is done desired
number of times (2 by default, like in the original test).
The test itself lies now inside tester's lambda. We fix the tested
range (at least 1, no more than 150). The minimum value could in
theory be greater, but it's enough to test that it's not overdue.
Finally, we wait for expected number of test runs. We give it twice
as much time as is in theory needed.
Task-number: QTBUG-83419
Task-number: QTBUG-58519
Change-Id: I43836d787d804f22bb66515ebb215d040189c4f3
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
[ChangeLog][Source-Incompatible Changes] QProcess::setupChildProcess()
was removed. To execute code in a child process, use
QProcess::setChildProcessModifier()
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QProcess] Added setChildProcessModifier() function
with which one can provide code to be run in the Unix child process
between fork() and execve(). With this function, it is no longer
necessary to derive from QProcess in order to execute actions in the
child process.
Another reason is that we can tell whether the std::function carries a
valid target much more easily than we can tell whether QProcess was
overridden.
The setupChildProcess() virtual function does not need to be marked
final, since no overrider could ever return an inaccessible private
class. This also makes sure the error presented to the user is about the
return type, not about attempting to override a final.
Clang:
error: virtual function 'f' has a different return type ('void') than the function it overrides (which has return type 'QProcess::Use_setChildProcessModifier_Instead')
GCC:
error: conflicting return type specified for 'virtual void MyProcess::setupChildProcess()'
note: overridden function is 'virtual QProcess::Use_setChildProcessModifier_Instead QProcess::setupChildProcess()'
ICC:
error: return type is neither identical to nor covariant with return type "QProcess::Use_setChildProcessModifier_Instead" of overridden virtual function "QProcess::setupChildProcess"
MSVC is not relevant since it doesn't compile to Unix.
Change-Id: Ia8b65350cd5d49debca9fffd15f801161363aea7
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
QDateTime::toString uses the C locale since 5ba66c5622
So don't expect locale specific day- and month-names.
Task-number: QTBUG-80441
Change-Id: I08f53b6b33ed9e7eaaa58df4ca6a966c4ba9ef24
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Instead of QCoreApplication::quit() directly calling exit(0), which would
leave QGuiApplication and client code out of the loop, we now send the
Quit event, and let it pass through event delivery, before finally ending
up in QCoreApplication::event(), where we call exit(0).
This has the advantage that QGuiApplication can ensure all windows are
closed before quitting, and if any of those windows ignore the close
event the quit will be aborted. This aligns the behavior of synthetic
quits via QCoreApplication::quit() with spontaneous quits from the
platform via QGuiApplicationPrivate::processApplicationTermination.
Clients who wish to exit the application without any event delivery or
potential user interaction can call the lower level exit() function
directly.
[ChangeLog][QtGui] Application termination via qApp->quit() will now
deliver Quit events to the application, which in turn will result in
application windows being closed as part of the application quit,
with an option to cancel the application quit by ignoring the close
event. Clients who explicitly want to exit the application without
any user interaction should call QCoreApplication::exit() explicitly.
Task-number: QTBUG-45262
Task-number: QTBUG-33235
Task-number: QTBUG-72013
Task-number: QTBUG-59782
Change-Id: Id4b3907e329b9ecfd936fe9a5f8a70cb66b76bb7
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Make QTBF ready for Qt6 by using qsizetype in the API and use
QStringView where it makes sense.
Change the exported API of qunicodetools to use QStringView as
well and use char16_t internally.
Change-Id: I853537bcabf40546a8e60fdf2ee7d751bc371761
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Calibrated to match F16C and ARM-FP16 hardware conversions.
Change-Id: I3bdd4d3db3046fee4aeb24e4ce8b9bc9a06e0397
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Just starting 20 threads to test this won't cut it if
the machine you're testing on has an ideal thread count
of 16 or larger.
Change-Id: Icba8f00aa836fec6da41c71b318e9e17bdd47c0e
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Since waiting for a spy employs polling, it may happen
that while waiting for a startedSpy we had received already
a signal for finishedSpy. This explains current flakiness.
The fix is to connect to lambdas instead and update
the hit count accordingly. Inside lambdas we also
ensure the correct order for started / finised signals.
After waitForFinished() unblocks we ensure that possible
pending asynchronous signals (started / finished) are processed
and check the final state.
Task-number: QTBUG-83076
Change-Id: I16963ef9c011cb613d7b409d3e3032303a942336
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Addresses ### Qt 6 comment, and documentation pointing out that the parameter
value is ignored. It wasn't ignored in the code, but that's the kind of change
we can make now.
With this change, QUnifiedTimer::updateAnimationTimers is only called with -1
as the currentTick input parameter, also from Qt Declarative. Make it default,
so that leaf modules can be fixed. Once that it done, the parameter can be
removed completely.
Change-Id: I80c57ff92f3b615b932dd73d711cf6397347efd8
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
C++20 via P1120 is deprecating arithmetic operations between
unrelated enumeration types, and GCC 10 is already complaining.
Hence, these operations might become illegal in C++23 or C++26 at
the latest.
A case of this that affects Qt is in key combinations: a
QKeySequence can be constructed by summing / ORing modifiers and a
key, for instance:
Qt::CTRL + Qt::Key_A
Qt::SHIFT | Qt::CTRL | Qt::Key_G (recommended, see below)
The problem is that the modifiers and the key belong to different
enumerations (and there's 2 enumerations for the modifier, and one
for the key).
To solve this: add a dedicated class to represent a combination of
keys, and operators between those enumerations to build instances
of this class.
I would've simply defined operator|, but again docs and pre-existing
code use operator+ as well, so added both to at least tackle simple
cases (modifier + key).
Multiple modifiers create a problem: operator+ between them yields
int, not the corresponding flags type (because operator+ is not
overloaded for this use case):
Qt::CTRL + Qt::SHIFT + Qt::Key_A
\__________________/ /
int /
\______________/
int
Not only this loses track of the datatypes involved, but it would
also then "add" the key (with NO warnings, now its int + enum, so
it's not mixing enums!) and yielding int again.
I don't want to special-case this; the point of the class is
that int is the wrong datatype. Everything works just fine when
using operator| instead:
Qt::CTRL | Qt::SHIFT | Qt::Key_A
\__________________/ /
Qt::Modifiers /
\______________/
QKeyCombination
So I'm defining operator+ so that the simple cases still work,
but also deprecating it.
Port some code around Qt to the new class. In certain cases,
it's a huge win for clarity. In some others, I've just added
the necessary casts to make it still compile without warnings,
without attempting refactorings.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QKeyCombination] New class to represent
a combination of a key and zero or more modifiers, to be used
when defining shortcuts or similar.
[ChangeLog][Potentially Source-Incompatible Changes] A keyboard
modifier (such as Qt::CTRL, Qt::AltModifier, etc.) should be
combined with a key (such as Qt::Key_A, Qt::Key_F1, etc.) by using
operator|, not operator+. The result is now an object of type
QKeyCombination, that stores the key and the modifiers.
Change-Id: I657a3a328232f059023fff69c5031ee31cc91dd6
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Traditionally when calling reserve it's because you expect to append
up to X amount of bytes. We should keep that behavior the same.
With another patch still in the works current behavior caused an issue
with QStringBuilder in QNAM, as mirrored in the testcase attached.
Change-Id: I9792a8f158fc9235e3de48ac8b06ac2c10e7f3dc
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Views / delegates absolutely *adore* hammering data(). A simple
QListView showing a couple of dozens entries can call data()
a hundred of times on the first show.
Back of the hand calculation,
* 2 times per visible item (sizeHint() + paint()),
* times 9 roles used by the default delegate,
* times 20 visible items
= 360 as a bare minimum, assuming the view doesn't redraw twice
accidentally. Move the mouse over the view, and that'll cause
a full update with certain styles: 360 calls to data() per update.
This has an overhead visible in profilers. The model's data()
has to re-fetch the index from its data structure and extract
the requested field every time.
Also, QVariant is used for the data interexchange,
meaning anything that won't fit in one is also a memory allocation.
This problem will likely be gone in Qt6Variant as that
will store sizeof(void*) * 3, meaning QImage/QPixmap and similar
polymorphic classes will fit in a QVariant now...
So I'm trying to to remove part of that overhead by allowing
views to request all the data they need in one go. For now,
one index a a time.
A view might also store the data returned. The idea is that
the same role on different indexes will _very likely_
return variants of the same type. So a model could move-assign
the data into the variant, avoiding the memory allocation
/deallocation for the variant's private.
This patch:
1) Introduces QModelRoleData as a holder for role+data.
2) Introduces QModelRoleDataSpan as a span over QModelRoleData.
The idea of a span type is twofold. First and foremost, we are
in no position to choose which kind of container a view should
use to store the QModelRoleData objects for a multiData() call;
a span abstracts any contiguous sequence, leaving the view free
to do whatever it wants (statically allocate, use a vector, etc.).
It also solves the problem of efficient passing the roles and
gathering the returned variants from multiData().
3) Add multiData(), which populates a span of roles for a given
model index. The main advantage here is that a model can fetch
all the needed information for a given index just once, then
iterate on the span and provide data for each requested role.
Cf. this with data(), where every call has to re-fetch
the information for the index.
A couple of models have been ported to multiData(), as well as
QStyledItemDelegate.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QModelRoleData] New class.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QModelRoleDataSpan] New class.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QAbstractItemModel] Added the multiData()
function.
Change-Id: Icce0d108ad4e156c9fb05c83ce6df5f58f99f118
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
So far QPropertyAlias was limited to working with QProperty<T>.
Change the implementation, so it can be constructed from any
property or even a QBindable<T>.
Change-Id: I175cffe94a9ef332367d39faa976eb065b0e6ffe
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Add a new BINDABLE declaration to the Q_PROPERTY() macro that tells moc
where to find the QBindable for the property.
Add a QUntypedBindable base class to QBindable<T> that gives access to
generic functionality and checks argument compatibility at runtime.
QBindable<T> will still do static checking at compile time.
Add QMetaProperty::isBindable() and QMetaProperty::bindable()
to be able to dynamically access the binding functionality.
Change-Id: Ic7b08ae2cde83fd43e627d813a886e1de01fa3dc
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Add a compatibility property class that makes porting to the new
property system as simple as possible.
Binding evaluation for those compat properties is eager, as we
do not control possible side effects of the code in the existing
setters.
Change-Id: Ic56347abb49e40631ec73e88c6d40d4bdb05ca29
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Add a QObjectComputedProperty. This class doesn't store the data
itself, instead relies on a getter method to compute it's value.
As the property is read-only, one can not bind to it, but it can
be used in other property bindings.
Change-Id: I0f6bffdd9f80f1d0829826f93a47257f2b3127af
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Add Q_OBJECT_BINDABLE_PROPERTY() macro that can be used to define
a bindable property inside QObject.
The macro and the class behind it creates storage for a property
that is bindable inside a QObject or QObjectPrivate. The property
only uses as much space as the data contained, ie. it has no
storage overhead, as long as no bindings are being used.
Bindings are being stored and looked up in the QBindingStorage
associated with the owning object.
Change-Id: I1dadd7bddbad6fbf10cfa791d6461574b9db82dd
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Add a private QBindableInterface and a public QBindable<T>
class, that will be the API interface for accessing bindings
for properties in QObject.
The QBindable class gives access to all aspects of
the property related to bindings. This includes setting
and retrieving bindings, installing observers and creating
a direct binding on this property.
Change-Id: Iaead54d2bd6947bd2cda5052142b2a47dd8bf7c4
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
These look rather weird, an explicit property.setBinding() call
is simply better in this case, and also more aligned with the API
we can offer in QObject.
Change-Id: Ifb00fd47a75e6b3bc94e34bf49e4f13249565bfe
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
And all related functionality. This is being replaced by
Q_BINDABLE_PROPERTY and Q_OBJECT_BINDABLE_PROPERTY in the
next few commits. The new infrastructure coming will play
nicer along with the existing property system.
Commented out some autotests, that will get reimplemented
with the updated infrastructure.
Change-Id: I50c30bd4d5c6c6b6471f8eb93870e27d86f5a009
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Rename QPropertyBase to QPropertyBindingData, as it contains the
data related to bindings. The new name fits better, as the data
can now also live somewhere else than the data strored in the
property.
Change-Id: I489efb86ad2e0bad2740c9d1aa74506fe103d343
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Since we will be storing property data differently in most cases,
having this special case would create too many additional complications.
Change-Id: I27042b0730559bb375d8e3c07324398403a9885d
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Enable the arrow operator for all types that could have members, so
that one can e.g. write myStringProperty->size() instead of having to
use the less convenient myStringProperty.value().size().
Also cleaned up the rvalue ref overloads to be
disabled for basic types. For those we now also
return by value, for more complex types we
return a const reference.
Change-Id: If6a75898dc0a097f57052488f0af0cd7166b3393
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
If one needed to listen to a signal just once, one had to
store the QMetaObject::Connection object returned by connect()
and use it to disconnect the slot after the first signal
activation.
This has led to a proliferation of using wrappers (and enough
TMP); they usually look like this:
1) create a shared_ptr<QMO::Connection>, allocating its payload;
2) create a lambda, capturing the shared_ptr by value;
3) in the lambda, disconnect the connection (through the shared_ptr),
and call the actual slot;
4) connect the signal to the lambda, storing the returned
QMO::Connection into the shared_ptr.
This is expensive, error prone for newcomers, and tricky to
support as a general facility inside one's projects.
We can do better, just support single shot connections right
in QObject.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QObject] Added the Qt::SingleShotConnection
flag. When a connection is established with this flag set,
the slot is going to be activated at most once; when the signal
is emitted, the connection gets automatically broken by Qt.
Change-Id: I5f5feeae7f76c9c3d6323d841efba81c8f98ce7e
Fixes: QTBUG-44219
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
One could guess it by assuming that disconnecting for a destroyed
receiver and disconnect() with given receiver use the same
implementation, but without closely knowing the implementation a
reader of the documentation can't know for sure.
Also add a test to prove that what the new documentation says is
really true.
Also remove an unnecessary negation in the preceding sentence.
Change-Id: I9d24442bb1a4646b89f969bad1a4d0e1eafa7534
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
