Modified unittests to use specific class headers instead of
using super-headers like QtCore that pull in all the headers for
the module.
- Decreasing build time.
Change-Id: I9c3fd0767be15205893bb406f609c8283a2a3a5a
Reviewed-by: Kurt Korbatits <kurt.korbatits@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
Change-Id: I4001fcabc67e5b46465b3c9111c33247c52e5788
Reviewed-by: David Faure <faure@kde.org>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
This is consistent with the rest of the API of QAbstractItemModel
(which is virtual) and removes the need for code like this
in the constructor (where it doesn't belong):
QHash<int, QByteArray> myRoleNames = roleNames();
myRoleNames.insert(Qt::UserRole + 1, "myCustomRole");
setRoleNames(myRoleNames);
in favor of
MyModel::roleNames() const {
QHash<int, QByteArray> myRoleNames = QAbstractItemModel::roleNames();
myRoleNames.insert(Qt::UserRole + 1, "myCustomRole");
return myRoleNames;
}
which is consistent with all other QAIM API (eg, flags()).
This is a source compatible change.
Change-Id: I7e1ce17f8dab2292c4c7b6dbd3c09ec71b5c793b
Reviewed-by: David Faure <faure@kde.org>
Reviewed-by: Marius Bugge Monsen <marius@cutehacks.com>
The test was allocating a new model on the heap each time init() was
invoked, but none of these models were deleted.
Change-Id: Ibe107b2dbc949a5f72940f67c08f4b0f46256c09
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
The value is changed to true. It is a common bug that developers expect
this proxy model to reflect the source model when the source changes.
That requires setDynamicSortFilter(true), so we change the default to
optimize for the common case.
Change-Id: I9bf7efdbda10309fa77aed9391c33054aaae4a29
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Avoid using bug tracker identifiers in test function names. These
identifiers lose their meaning when the bug tracker is replaced.
Change-Id: Ia867f7c2ec2ab9ed546588843d532ac615a34031
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
The restored test data was marked as failing, but appears to pass, and
the available history does not explain why it was commented out.
Change-Id: I7e9e3ba72fc8fef42c91ee882efa98d25b3d8317
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
When using QSignalSpy, always verify that the signal spy is valid. This
will cause the test to give a meaningful failure when spying on a
non-existant signal. Without this change, tests that spy on a signal to
ensure that it is not emitted (i.e. by comparing the spy count to zero)
could pass erroneously if something went wrong when creating the signal
spy, as an invalid QSignalSpy will always return a count of zero.
Change-Id: I41f4a63d9f0de9190a86de237662dc96be802446
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
