CMakeLists.txt and .cmake files of significant size
(more than 2 lines according to our check in tst_license.pl)
now have the copyright and license header.
Existing copyright statements remain intact
Task-number: QTBUG-88621
Change-Id: I3b98cdc55ead806ec81ce09af9271f9b95af97fa
Reviewed-by: Jörg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Replace the current license disclaimer in files by
a SPDX-License-Identifier.
Files that have to be modified by hand are modified.
License files are organized under LICENSES directory.
Task-number: QTBUG-67283
Change-Id: Id880c92784c40f3bbde861c0d93f58151c18b9f1
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jörg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Remove the qmake project files for most of Qt.
Leave the qmake project files for examples, because we still test those
in the CI to ensure qmake does not regress.
Also leave the qmake project files for utils and other minor parts that
lack CMake project files.
Task-number: QTBUG-88742
Change-Id: I6cdf059e6204816f617f9624f3ea9822703f73cc
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Koehne <kai.koehne@qt.io>
Modify special case locations to use the new API as well.
Clean up some stale .prev files that are not needed anymore.
Clean up some project files that are not used anymore.
Task-number: QTBUG-86815
Change-Id: I9947da921f98686023c6bb053dfcc101851276b5
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
C++20 via P1120 is deprecating arithmetic operations between
unrelated enumeration types, and GCC 10 is already complaining.
Hence, these operations might become illegal in C++23 or C++26 at
the latest.
A case of this that affects Qt is in key combinations: a
QKeySequence can be constructed by summing / ORing modifiers and a
key, for instance:
Qt::CTRL + Qt::Key_A
Qt::SHIFT | Qt::CTRL | Qt::Key_G (recommended, see below)
The problem is that the modifiers and the key belong to different
enumerations (and there's 2 enumerations for the modifier, and one
for the key).
To solve this: add a dedicated class to represent a combination of
keys, and operators between those enumerations to build instances
of this class.
I would've simply defined operator|, but again docs and pre-existing
code use operator+ as well, so added both to at least tackle simple
cases (modifier + key).
Multiple modifiers create a problem: operator+ between them yields
int, not the corresponding flags type (because operator+ is not
overloaded for this use case):
Qt::CTRL + Qt::SHIFT + Qt::Key_A
\__________________/ /
int /
\______________/
int
Not only this loses track of the datatypes involved, but it would
also then "add" the key (with NO warnings, now its int + enum, so
it's not mixing enums!) and yielding int again.
I don't want to special-case this; the point of the class is
that int is the wrong datatype. Everything works just fine when
using operator| instead:
Qt::CTRL | Qt::SHIFT | Qt::Key_A
\__________________/ /
Qt::Modifiers /
\______________/
QKeyCombination
So I'm defining operator+ so that the simple cases still work,
but also deprecating it.
Port some code around Qt to the new class. In certain cases,
it's a huge win for clarity. In some others, I've just added
the necessary casts to make it still compile without warnings,
without attempting refactorings.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QKeyCombination] New class to represent
a combination of a key and zero or more modifiers, to be used
when defining shortcuts or similar.
[ChangeLog][Potentially Source-Incompatible Changes] A keyboard
modifier (such as Qt::CTRL, Qt::AltModifier, etc.) should be
combined with a key (such as Qt::Key_A, Qt::Key_F1, etc.) by using
operator|, not operator+. The result is now an object of type
QKeyCombination, that stores the key and the modifiers.
Change-Id: I657a3a328232f059023fff69c5031ee31cc91dd6
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
