In the process, split it from its comments block and don't bother with
a YAML block if it would only have contained comments.
Task-number: QTBUG-96844
Change-Id: I08c20f796252bb270ba9caa4c055cdcc0843a88b
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
When producing a diagnostics block, include the file and line
information, if we have it, to describe it. This presently only adds
this information for skip, but could in principle do the same for a
B?XPass.
Task-number: QTBUG-96844
Change-Id: I6cc375d98e2369eba262010f9c2dfbcba931a6f1
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Our TAP output was delivering messages as comments before the test
line, where TAP clearly expects the details of a test to follow its
test line. Version 13 provides a YAML block to deliver diagnostics and
encourages use of this, so accumulate our messages in a
QTestCharBuffer instead of emitting them one by one.
However, messages produced after a test has produced its test line
belong to that test, but are too late to be included in its
diagnostics block, so should be emitted immediately as before, albeit
now with a type prefix. This at least separates such messages, from
the end of one test, from messages produced early in the next.
In the process, add a type-prefix to each, to make clear what type of
message it was. Since the Yamlish supported by TAP consumers doesn't
support a way to have many messages, use the extensions: top-level
hash tag with a messages: sub-tag to gather our messages as a list.
(This expands at least one expected output file significantly and
substantially rewrites some others.)
Add methods to QTestCharBuffer, and a helper function, to support this.
Task-number: QTBUG-96844
Change-Id: If44a33da5879ed1670ef0980042599afd516f9d2
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Added tests for repeated skips and failures (from within void lambdas,
to simulate skips and failures from within event handlers). These
exhibit yet more ways to count more than one outcome for a test. The
new QTest::failOnWarning() can also provoke more than one failure from
a single test, and several existing selftests exhibited various ways
for the Totals line's counts to add up to more than the number of
actual tests run.
Fixed counting so that only the first decisive incident is counted.
Tests can still report later failure or skipping, but only the first
is counted.
Added a currentTestState in qtestlog.cpp, by which it keeps track of
whether the test has resolved to a result, and clearCurrentTestState()
by which other code can reset that at the end of each test. This
brought to light various places where test-end clean-up was not being
handled - due to failure or skipping in a *_data() method or init, or
a skip in cleanup.
Fixes: QTBUG-95661
Change-Id: I5d24a37a53d3db225fa602649d8aad8f5ed6c1ad
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
This mimics the effects of test-code delegating checks to other
functions, which can lead to repeated failures. The failing test
should only contribute one to the total of failed tsts. Drive-by:
correct an existing test's reporting of its own name.
Task-number: QTBUG-95661
Change-Id: I370fd2aee378d9fdd35826f0d11677483c60423d
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
The Test Anything Protocol (TAP), was originally Perl's simple text-based
interface between testing modules and test harnesses, but has since been
adopted by a large number of producers and consumers in many different
languages, which allows colorizing and summarizing test results.
The format is very simple:
TAP version 13
ok 1 - test description
not ok 2 - test description
---
message: 'Failure message'
severity: fail
expected: 123
actual: 456
...
ok 3 - test description # SKIP
1..3
The specification [1] is very brief, so the implementation has been
based on how typical consumers behave, especially when it comes to
the undefined diagnostics block.
[1] http://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html
Change-Id: I616e802ea380165c678510e940ddc6607d39c92d
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
