We want to re-enable Android tests in QTQAINFRA-3867. However,
many tests are failing already preventing that from happening.
QTBUG-87025 is currently keeping track (links) to all of those
failing tests.
The current proposal is to hide those failing tests, and enable
Android test running in COIN for other tests. After, that try
to fix them one by one, and at the same time we can make sure
no more failing tests go unnoticed.
Task-number: QTBUG-87025
Change-Id: Ic1fe9fdd167cbcfd99efce9a09c69c344a36bbe4
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
Use GrowsAt* and GrowthPosition as that is clearer.
Change-Id: I3c173797dec3620f508156efc0c51b4d2cd3e142
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
My endeavours figuring out why QList::append(elem) gives worst
performance compared to 5.15 ended up into this commit. After some
straightforward fixes, what was left is "everything is uniformly worse"
and takes more CPU cycles
Introduce emplaceBack implementation as append is quite a special case
that could be greatly simplified. This is a "straightforward" part of
the optimizations
While at it, change append(t) to use emplaceBack(t)
For workloads like:
QList<int> list;
forever {
list.append(0);
}
this gives huge improvement (roughly 30% for 10k+ elements),
movable and complex types also get a tiny speedup
Task-number: QTBUG-87330
Change-Id: I9261084e545c24e5473234220d2a3f2cd26c2b7f
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Inline them into the one place they are called from
and remove duplicated code.
Change-Id: Ica88485e98625905083b16c24ee9eaf223a89ae0
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Get rid of the allocation options inside the flags
field of QArrayData, they are really a completely
separate thing.
Change-Id: I823750ab9e4ca85642a0bd0e471ee79c9cde43fb
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Don't use QArrayData::GrowsForward/Backward anymore and replace
it with a simple 'bool grow'.
Change-Id: Ifddfef3ae860b11dda4c40854c71ef2aeb29df34
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
reallocate() should only ever call realloc(), and only be used to
create more space at the end of the data.
Change-Id: I2ac4dbc90d2afaa571bb620108d7984356712cb2
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
The while insertion logic will need further work to make it
more efficient. Currently it does use copy construction and
assignment for internal moving instead of move operations.
Change-Id: I7ae3094daa43a44629d8fa89ab6562c2a21b6cbd
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Avoid moving data inside the array to create free
space at one end. This is a performance bottleneck,
as it required quite a lot of calculations for every
insert. Rather reallocate and grow in this case,
so we only need to do expensive work when we reallocate
the array.
Change-Id: Ifc955fbcf9967c3b66aa2600e0627aac15f0c917
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
It looks like we can drastically simplify the way QADP grows without
sacrificing much:
1. append-only use cases should have the same performance as before
2. prepend-only use cases should (with the help of other commits) get
additional performance speedup
3. mid-insertion is harder to reason about, but it is either unchanged
or benefits a bit as there's some free space at both ends now
4. mixed prepend/append cases are weird and would keep excess free
space around but this is less critical and overall less used AFAIK
Now, QList would actually start to feel like a double-ended container
instead of "it's QVector but with faster prepend". This commit should
help close the performance gap between 6.0 and 5.15 as well
As a drawback, we will most likely have more space allocated in mixed
and mid-insert cases. This needs to be checked
Task-number: QTBUG-86583
Change-Id: I7c6ede896144920fe01862b9fe789c8fdfc11f80
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
And add a QMultiHash::unite(const QHash &) method to avoid
a copy of the data when inserting a QHash into a multi hash.
Change-Id: I864aa9d2b9b7b2c367c3c4d140a2ce2f5408ae09
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The old code was trying to convert a multi hash to a QHash. While
that worked in Qt 5 it won't compile in Qt 6 anymore.
QHashCombineCommutative also can't be used with a std::pair.
ADL won't find the correct instance with a namespaced build,
as qHash(std::pair) is defined after QHashCommutative. Fix
the code to compile and work correctly.
Change-Id: Ice2bc3ab4244e310cbbb5e0f31fc11eb14f5faf3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This ensurse that we do not do dobule notifications in setValue.
Moerover we avoid needless notifications in markDirtyAndNotifyObservers
when the value did not change. Lastly, if the value did actually change,
we pass that information along to notify, so that we do not evaluate the
eager property twice.
Fixes a test-case which errorneously relied on the old behavior, and
adds a new test which verifies that the fix works.
Change-Id: I8ec6fa2fe8611565dfc603ceab3ba5f92999b26c
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
std::function as a type is rather unfortunate for us, as its SSO buffer
makes it rather large, and we can ensure that the function is never
empty.
Considering that we do need to allocate memory for
QPropertyBindingPrivate anyway, we can get rid of the SSO buffer and
instead coalesce the allocations (similar to how std::make_shared works).
The memory looks then like
[--QPropertyBindingPrivate--][Functor]
and QPropertyBindingPrivate can get a pointer to the functor via
reinterpret_cast<std::byte>(this)+sizeof(QPropertyBindingPrivate).
To actually do anything with the functor, we do however need a "vtable"
which describes how we can call, destroy and move the functor. This is
done by creating a constexpr struct of function pointers, and storing a
pointer to it in QPropertyBindingPrivate.
As a consequence of those changes, we cannot use QESDP anymore, as we
now have to carefully deallocate the buffer we used for both the
QPropertyBindingPrivate and the functor. We introduce a custom
refcounting pointer for that. While we're at it, we make the refcount
non-atomic, as bindings do not work across threads to begin with.
Moreover, we can now make the class non-virtual, as that was only needed
to hack around limitations of QESDP in the context of exported symbols.
Change-Id: Idc5507e4c120e28df5bd5aea717fe69f15e540dc
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
We'll need QContainerTraits as a class for changing properties
of our containers, so free up that name. This is not a problem,
as the namespace is new in Qt 6 and has only been used internally
so far.
Change-Id: I6d6b9d9c32b92b77e66323f1fc29b3ddd8baa98f
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
The tst_qtimer::zeroTimer unit test was relying on
QCoreApplication::processEvents processing all pending
events. However, for the glib backend, this is not the case.
For the glib backend, if there is an event of high
priority pending, low priority events are not processed.
This patch changes the test to use the overload with
timeout of processEvents, which does process events
until there are no more events or the timeout is reached.
Fixes: QTBUG-84291
Change-Id: I429141507b8603b57a191efa21f154493d75cc9e
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Since the QVariant types are deprecated in Qt6, use QMetaType instead
Change-Id: I7bddea15a3f1a534d3c6f6b9e7ddf9585a8423bf
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The documentation states that QDate::fromString() accepts negative
year numbers, but it did not. This patch adds support for negative
year numbers to QDate::fromString() and corresponding unit tests.
Furthermore, tests are added for positive signs (+) in date strings.
Fixes: QTBUG-84334
Task-number: QTBUG-84349
Change-Id: I575291e7b8317055d4bb530011d7b10c9cd37ae1
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
- Remove the casting operator of QFuture<T> to T. It calls
QFuture::result(), which may lead to undefined behavior if the user
has moved the results from QFuture via QFuture::takeResult() before
trying to do the conversion.
- Disable implicit conversion of QFuture<T> to QFuture<void>, by making
the constructor explicit. If the users really intend to do the
conversion, they should do it explicitly.
[ChangeLog][Source-Incompatible Changes][QFuture] Implicit conversions
of QFuture<T> to T and to QFuture<void> have been disabled. Use
QFuture::result() or QFuture::takeResult() where you need to convert
QFuture<T> to T. Use the explicit QFuture<void>(const QFuture<T> &)
constructor to convert QFuture<T> to QFuture<void>.
Change-Id: I153d4137d36365b1611ac934fb3ac2eb667fdd6c
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jarek Kobus <jaroslaw.kobus@qt.io>
So far, the internals of QDateTimeParser and especially the handling
of 'Intermediate' values were only tested implicitly by
tst_qdatetimeedit. 'Intermediate' values are values which
are not valid according to the specified format, but could
become valid by adding more characters.
This patch adds unit tests which tests parsing of
these intermediate values directly.
These tests will help implement handling of negative
year numbers, where additional complications arise
because of possible ambiguities between the minus sign '-'
and the separator '-'.
Task-number: QTBUG-84334
Change-Id: Ia6ba08df198288b8b11d3b2d2052c194f04fe8a1
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
These operators don't do what the user might expect and may lead to
confusing results.
[ChangeLog][Source-Incompatible Changes][QFuture] The comparison
operators of QFuture have been removed. They were comparing the
underlying d-ptrs instead of comparing the results (as the users
might expect), which is not very helpful for the users point of view.
Change-Id: I80a887610eac38b60329128cca52cdb5fb515207
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
Requires subsequent re-numbering of the enum tables to eliminate gaps,
before locale data can be regenerated. However, it will work with the
present locale data, since it merely loses the means to use some names
for which the available data was just the name and code. This implies
a transient issue of recognising some codes for which there is no
actual enum member; but relevant code will work as before, finding
nothing but the code and its name. This shall be resolved by a coming
BiC change to resort the language, country and script codes, changing
the numbering (almost) completely.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QLocale] Various obsolete language and country
codes have been removed. Some lacked locale data, others were obsolete
aliases. All have been deprecated in 5.15.
Task-number: QTBUG-84669
Change-Id: I45fc76a5f2f6c3b0ea3c1bb61e917da984183783
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
As advocated in a ### Qt 6 comment.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QItemSelectionRange] QItemSelectionRange no longer
supports ordering. The prior ordering was inconsistent with equality
and should not be needed.
Task-number: QTBUG-85700
Change-Id: I5eb372c203cae19db40fa67f706d911785652d5f
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Ready for removal at Qt 6, as advocated in a ### comment.
It was never done consistently with operator==(), apparently, and
should not be needed in any case.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QItemSelectionRange] Ordering of
QItemSelectionRange is now deprecated. It was not consistent with
equality and should not be needed.
Task-number: QTBUG-85700
Pick-to: 5.15 5.15.2
Change-Id: Ie99294bd7fc18f2a497598ae08840886b0a6d62d
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Append was previously optimized for lhs being empty but it should've
also taken into account if space had been reserved.
Apply the same optimization to prepend while we're at it.
Change-Id: I5e5d33a3189b9ad88d45e858a2ac412cbc294f79
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QLocale] Deprecated several Language and Country
aliases, ready for removal in Qt 6.0, in favor of their newer names.
Task-number: QTBUG-84669
Pick-to: 5.15 5.15.2
Change-Id: Iebaa0a5a77bfa12f7014de53fab4a25b5f1cc92c
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
These are languages for which CLDR does not even recognize the claimed
language code (three-letter codes except for bh = Bihari, which might
be an old name for bho = Bhojpuri, which CLDR does give, but provides
no locale data using it).
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QLocale::Language] Many obsolete language names
are now deprecated in preparation for removal at Qt 6.0. No data has
been available for any locale using these languages since CLDR v29 (at
least; Qt now uses v37).
Task-number: QTBUG-84669
Pick-to: 5.15 5.15.2
Change-Id: I2bf2d49211ade7cc511277f35fb1a247e7048b31
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
This reverts commit 1918c689d7.
The template gets always instantiated in QObjectPrivate::connect, even
if the connection types is not Qt::(Blocking)QueuedConnection. For
non-queued connections we however support using incomplete types in
connect. The only way to fix this would be to make the connection type a
template parameter of QObjectPrivate::connect (or at lesat pass some
compile time constant indicating "blocking"-ness) along, so that we can
use if constexpr instead of if. As all involved classes are private, we
can postpone investigating this solution to 6.1
Change-Id: Ieffaf015f8e60ca6ac6f85eb9e2756e480060b4f
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
This patch reverts the last attempt to fix it:
4a1de178c9.
In addition, instead of using imprecise QTest::qSleep()
we trigger a single shot PreciseTimer twice
and gather the measurements in lambdas.
We wait for lambdas to be executed - we give it
twice as much time as is in theory needed.
Afterwards we verify all the data collected in lambdas.
Fixes: QTBUG-82825
Change-Id: Ib691f5f23a92fb8b41a24f7b603981d9c9450ddc
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
The qdatetimeparser was not tested explicitly so far, but only
implicitly in tst_qdate / tst_qdatetime / tst_qdatetimeedit etc.
This made it difficult to test some corner cases, especially in the
context of unfinished dates, i.e. dates which are invalid, but could
become valid by adding more characters. This is used to validate
user input in qdatetimeedit.
Task-number: QTBUG-84334
Change-Id: I27202849abb1b7cad96d3e25f7ac81ce85272b2a
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
* Rearrange the documention to match the enumeration order.
Fixes: QTBUG-87037
Change-Id: Iad001351e0f309e694b8bbd503813017e6586a21
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Alex Blasche <alexander.blasche@qt.io>
It's been obsolete for a long time already. Make sure
the compiler now warns about it and remove all remaining
uses in qtbase.
Change-Id: I0ff80311184dba52d2ba5f4e2fabe0d47fdc59d7
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
This mostly reverts change 76e8e8e9c8.
The reason is that storing non relocatable types inline in
QVariants storage would implicitly make QVariant non relocatable.
Fixes: QTBUG-87686
Change-Id: I2a09b1dcdd907d60085dccf17f987086dcba878c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Keep this in sync with the changes we have done in QTypeInfo.
Change-Id: Iaacb0f3cc5c46d3486084a1f6eca480a233d5e1a
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
RFC2822 requires times to be in the format 'HH:mm' or 'HH:mm:ss'.
We did not have unit tests to check that malformed RFC2822
dates are rejected. This patch adds such unit tests for
truncated hours/minutes/seconds.
Change-Id: Id5b9390112e633e617722439ad59439e6aeba841
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
We cannot rely on "QString a; a.insert(0, u'A');" to give
a.capacity() >= 3, this is clearly an implementation detail. Changed
the check to a meaningful one
Task-number: QTBUG-87416
Change-Id: I2e017c1292d360e32b85b903361027485c08ea74
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Unlike the 32-bit version, we can't go to a bigger integer type to do
the multiplication with. So instead accept looping. Both libstdc++ and
libc++ implement std::uniform_int_distribution this way anyway, but in a
far more complex way.
There is no looping if the "highest" is a power of two. The worst-case
scenario is when "highest" is one past a power of two (like 65). In that
case, we'll loop until the number is in range. Since all bits have equal
probability of being zero or one, there's a 50-50 chance that the most
significant useful bit will be set[*], in which case we'll need to loop
and we again get the same probability. So on average, we only need two
iterations to get an acceptable result.
[*] There's also a possibility that the other bits are such that the
number is still in range. For 65, we'd need the other 5 bits to be zero
(64 is a valid result), but the probability of that is only 1/2^5 =
3.125%. The bigger "highest" is, the closer we get to zero, so
approximate by saying that never happens and instead calculate that the
most significant useful bit is the controlling one.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QRandomGenerator] Added 64-bit versions of the
bounded() functions. They are useful in conjunction with Qt 6's 64-bit
container sizes, so code that used to call bounded(list.size()) in Qt 5
will continue to compile and work in Qt 6.
Fixes: QTBUG-86318
Change-Id: I3eb349b832c14610895efffd16356927fe78fd02
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
This saves duplicating them with its own flags.
Task-number: QTBUG-85700
Change-Id: I9e938322fd787282cfd9f941f83af8c0d76aaa9d
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
As requested by a ### Qt 6 comment. This then implied a few other
functions weren't constexpr, which broke some tests.
Task-number: QTBUG-85700
Change-Id: I6522a9b2d7a74e117442121400a1d7198d323967
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This way we can actually modify the container. Previously the interface
was rather useless.
Change-Id: I278aae46999862ada115c9066a010d7de5cde4ff
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
The high-level iterable interfaces should coerce the types of most
QVariants passed to the expected ones. To do this, move the type
coercion code into qvariant.{h|cpp} so that it is available to the
QVariantRef specializations.
The exception are variants passed to the find() functions of associative
iterables. Here, we should not coerce values we cannot convert to the
default-constructed keys. Instead we return end() in such cases.
Fixes: QTBUG-87687
Change-Id: I0bd4e5c4e4e270dd3bf36cb3fb115794828077f2
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
The test macro's first three parameters were given a QLocale:: prefix
by the macro, but the last three weren't. Save uses of the macro the
need to repeat the prefix in all parameters, thereby making the test
cases easier to read. Also, we can compare enum values, rather than
casting them to int; and, when a test fails, reporting the enum name
is far more informative than reporting the integer that represents it.
Change-Id: Ib0360c51049333b4a00ea84e271c99db6724334f
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
