Don't just wait for 300ms for the thread to finish, this can
lead to faling tests esp. on slow hardware.
Also fix a mem leak.
Change-Id: Ifa90da5507fc6d65ef77e368d7c238271623ff53
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@qt.io>
Some tests were fixed and others were skipped/blacklisted.
Task-number: QTBUG-63152
Change-Id: Ica7df555f8d152ee589865911130525101d4b941
Reviewed-by: Liang Qi <liang.qi@qt.io>
There is no need to qWait() before a QTRY_VERIFY. qWait() will also
intermittently handle events while waiting, so calling it in a loop isn't
necessary.
Change-Id: Ica7fbf18c03e673213dd9b72f31f71937cdcb145
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
There was a race condition between QObject::disconnect() and
QMetaObject::activate() which can occur if there are multiple
BlockingQueued connections to one signal from different threads and
they connect/disconnect their connections often.
What can happen in this case is:
T1 is in activate() method and T2 is in disconnect() method
T1 T2
locks sender mutex
selects next connection
unlocks sender mutex
locks sender mutex
sets isSlotObject to false
creates QMetaCallEvent derefs connection
posts event
Two things can happen here:
1. Connection can still be valid, but it will have isSlotObject==false
and callFunction will be used instead of slotObj
2. Connection can already be invalid
To fix it mutex unlock should be moved after QMetaCallEvent creation.
Also there is another case, when we don't disconnect but delete the
receiver object. In this case it can already be invalid during
postEvent, so we need to move mutex unlock after postEvent.
Change-Id: I8103798324140ee11de5b4e10906562ba878ff8b
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
From Qt 5.7 -> tools & applications are lisenced under GPL v3 with some
exceptions, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new GPL-EXCEPT header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under GPL 3 with exceptions)
Change-Id: I42a473ddc97101492a60b9287d90979d9eb35ae1
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
Qt copyrights are now in The Qt Company, so we could update the source
code headers accordingly. In the same go we should also fix the links to
point to qt.io.
Outdated header.LGPL removed (use header.LGPL21 instead)
Old header.LGPL3 renamed to header.LGPL3-COMM to match actual licensing
combination. New header.LGPL-COMM taken in the use file which were
using old header.LGPL3 (src/plugins/platforms/android/extract.cpp)
Added new header.LGPL3 containing Commercial + LGPLv3 + GPLv2 license
combination
Change-Id: I6f49b819a8a20cc4f88b794a8f6726d975e8ffbe
Reviewed-by: Matti Paaso <matti.paaso@theqtcompany.com>
QMetaType::create can call user code and we should not keep mutex held as
this may cause dead lock.
Make sure the tst_qobjectrace actually emit some signal so the test check
there is no race if the receiver object is destroyed while
the mutex is unlocked.
Task-number: QTBUG-39990
Change-Id: I56ca1ae7a11cd7b33c1a68727370972862e11c2f
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
When we unlock the mutex, we need to take in account that the Connection
pointed by 'node' may be destroyed in another thread while it is unlocked
Doing 'node->prev = &node' will make sure that 'node' is actually
updated when it is destroyed.
Setting isSlotObject under the mutex is safer and ensure that no other
thread will attempt to deref the object.
The regression was introduced in 5885b8f775
tst_qobjectrace was updated to catch races arising when we are
connecting with function pointers.
Change-Id: Ia0d11ae8df563dad97eb86993a786b579b28cd03
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
Change copyrights and license headers from Nokia to Digia
Change-Id: If1cc974286d29fd01ec6c19dd4719a67f4c3f00e
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergio Ahumada <sergio.ahumada@digia.com>
As in the past, to avoid rewriting various autotests that contain
line-number information, an extra blank line has been inserted at the
end of the license text to ensure that this commit does not change the
total number of lines in the license header.
Change-Id: I311e001373776812699d6efc045b5f742890c689
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
Currently there seems to be no precise definition of what
an integrationtest is in the context of Qt testing.
To avoid confusion, the tests under integrationtests/ are
moved into other/ (which is effectively where we keep
tests that don't clearly fit into any other category).
Tests can be moved back into an integrationtests/ directory
at a later point, should an unambiguous definition be established.
Change-Id: I3bb289be2dc2aca11b51a8ce8fcc5942f06d6c5c
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
