Item views can open an editor widget on the first key press, and need to
take special care not to break input methods. The initial key press
starts compositing by the system input method, which is then interrupted
by the focus transfer to the editor.
To solve this problem, the widget needs to keep focus while the initial
composition is ongoing, and only transfer focus to the editor once the
composition is either accepted or cancelled by the user. Add a state flag
that is set during this initial preedit phase.
During this initial composition, the item view will receive all input
method events, and needs to forward these to the open, but not yet focused
editor for the user to get the correct visual feedback during the preedit
phase. The item view also needs to report to input method queries on
behalf of the editor to make sure that the IM UI is correctly positioned
without covering the user input.
Implement a test that simulates the sequences through synthesized
QInputMethodEvents; we can't simulate the entire system input stack.
Fixes: QTBUG-54848
Change-Id: Ief3fe349f9d7542949032905c7f9ca2beb197611
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
After the last row is moved, 0 will be returned when obtaining
row and column data. At this time, QListView::doitemslayout will
not call d->doitemslayout, so the QBspTree data structure will
not be cleaned up, leaving a stale tree structure behind. This
will trigger an assert during paintEvent handling if QListView is
set to IconMode
In QListView::ListMode the test for a valid model index doesn't
use an assert.
Call QListViewPrivate::clear explicitly if the column count is 0
so that the QBspTree and other data structures are cleared.
Add a test case that simulates this scenario by implementing a
model that returns a 0 column count for an index after the model
structure was changed through a move of rows.
Done-with: Volker Hilsheimer
Fixes: QTBUG-95463
Pick-to: 5.15 6.1 6.2
Change-Id: I36419be5459b8ced930c619f538482ea1db4ad03
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Unlike an acceptable effect in QTableView + QTreeView
setAdjustPolicy(QAbstractScrollArea::AdjustToContents)
unfortunately didn't work for QListViews (and QListWidget).
This patch corrects QListViews AdjustToContents
behavior.
[ChangeLog][QtWidgets][QListView] A more correct implementation
of QListView::viewportSizeHint has been made. That
implies that setting the sizeAdjustPolicy to AdjustToContent
on QListView and QListWidget will now cause the view to
size after the contents and avoid scrollbars.
Pick-to: 6.2
Task-number: QTBUG-58749
Change-Id: I1675115f2348e2fcf0b2c39b451ef337e10eb872
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
The QtTest best practices documentations recommends using output
mechanisms such as qDebug() and qWarning() for diagnostic messages,
and this is also what most of our own tests do.
The QWARN() macro and corresponding internal QTest::qWarn() function
was added when QtTest was first implemented, but was likely meant as
an internal implementation detail, like its cousin QTestLog::info(),
which does not have any corresponding macro.
This theory is backed by our own QtTest self-test (tst_silent)
describing the output from QWARN() as "an internal testlib warning".
The only difference between QWARN() and qWarning(), besides the much
richer feature set of the latter, is that qWarning() will not pass
on file and line number information in release mode, but QWARN() will.
This is an acceptable loss of functionality, considering that the user
can override this behavior by defining QT_MESSAGELOGCONTEXT.
[ChangeLog][QtTest] QWARN() has been deprecated in favor of qWarning()
Pick-to: 6.2
Change-Id: I5a2431ce48c47392244560dd520953b9fc735c85
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
layoutAboutToBeChanged must be called before
persistentIndexList as the user might create persistent indexes
as a response to the signal
Fixes: QTBUG-93466
Pick-to: 6.2 5.15
Change-Id: I73c24501f536ef9b6092c3374821497f0a8f0de4
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
For SingleSelection, removing the selected item will select the nearest
item and, if autoScroll is enabled, ensures that the newly selected
item is visible in the viewport. This may result in scrolling.
For Multi- or ExtendedSelection, this should not happen, as having no
selection is perfectly fine in those modes.
However, QListView still tried to scroll to the current item in response
to the currentIndexChanged signal. Since the currentIndex is at this
point already hidden, the rectangle for it became invalid, and the
attempt to scroll resulted in a one-pixel up-movement of the viewport
(since the invalid rectangle has width == height == -1).
Fix this by not scrolling if the rect for the index is invalid. Note that
the index is still valid at this point, so we can't shortcut the call
stack earlier. Add test that exercises the different combinations of
ViewMode and SelectionMode, and demonstrates the one-pixel
movement without the fix.
Fixes: QTBUG-94788
Pick-to: 6.2 6.1 5.15
Change-Id: I1f36973eadb46e8c9b8b8068bc76ee09e9f490dd
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
QTableView stored the current row/column selection start in an own
variable instead using currentSelectionStartIndex. This leads to an
inconsistent behavior when the selection is done with a click on the
header and then in a cell (and the other way round)
Fixes: QTBUG-92561
Change-Id: I4c8bda3a938de451b6eff2819141e86a6870fbef
Pick-to: 6.1 6.2
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
This test failed when checking for a pre-condition of the tested scenario,
so skip the test if that condition isn't met, as the test won't test
anything.
Amends b1fdcc8c0f.
Pick-to: 6.2 6.1 5.15
Task-number: QTBUG-64543
Change-Id: I135cd5b45efcae111305b9be338eb5429d3b97d5
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
A mouse press that transfers focus from an open editor back to the view
will close the editor. To prevent that the corresponding release then
opens the same editor again we need to know that the closeEditor call
was caused by the mouse press. Since Qt first generates the focusOut
event, and then delivers the mouse press, we have to start a zero-timer
to check whether we are in the same event delivery process. If so, ignore
the corresponding release.
Add test case that simulates that chain of events.
Fixes: QTBUG-20456
Pick-to: 6.2 6.1
Change-Id: I28fa32bfbc776db207c594c329961f575ae58ea9
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
When the listview setWordWrap is true and ScrollBarPolicy is
ScrollBarAsNeeded, if QStyle::PM_ScrollView_ScrollBarOverlap
returns true, the text displayed an empty line.
Fix this by not reserving the width of the vertical scrollbar
if the flow is TopToBottom and the vertical scrollbar, and QStyle
returns true for PM_ScrollView_ScrollBarOverlap. Amends
aeef92c3c3
Pick-to: 6.1 6.2
Fixes: QTBUG-94248
Done-with: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Change-Id: I4d47c7e86bbb86474cb1a99bb26d8b67f0e8a7e2
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
When pressing an index in order to start a flick gesture, QAIV sets
the current index. When QScroller changes state to Dragging, then
QAIV restores the current index to what it was before the press, as
the user is clearly scrolling the view. With autoScroll enabled, this
will produce an ugly jump if the old current index is no longer in
the viewport.
To prevent this, disable autoScroll before restoring the currentIndex.
Fixes: QTBUG-64543
Pick-to: 6.2 6.1 5.15
Change-Id: I3e0a18a6a179d80b9d810fce5aa658f0cfff9a29
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
Since 0f1008a593, views record if they
moved the item in the model, and prevent the deletion of the source item
in QAbstractItemView by setting the dropEventMoved private data member.
However, QListView in icon mode is special: it doesn't rearrange the
model, it repositions the icons in the view. While the dropEventMoved
logic was applied to the drag event filter to prevent deletion, the
variable was never set in the filterDropEvent handler. The drop event got
ignored, breaking rearranging of icons.
Fix this by setting the dropEventMoved member in filterDropEvent.
Fixes: QTBUG-94226
Pick-to: 5.15 6.1
Change-Id: I963f5db0f81bcd0d25eef05d9a265be00a5871f6
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
In MultiSelection mode, items are by default toggled on press, which
follows the example of standard Windows controls. However, when dragging
is enabled, then the press might be the beginning of a drag'n'drop
operation, and deselecting the item on press breaks the selection and user
experience.
Don't toggle the selection for presses on an already selected item that
might get dragged; instead, wait for the release event.
Extend the test case slightly to cover the special case. Dragging a
selection in a drag-enabled and MultiSelection item view wasn't possible
before either.
Fixes: QTBUG-59888
Change-Id: Ibd3e95a71ea63dd1e9bc3c8a723eafa9a1c21afa
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: David Skoland <david.skoland@qt.io>
In ExtendedSelection mode, a Ctrl+Press might be both the start of
a selection toggle, or the start of a Ctrl+Drag operation.
If we already toggle on the press, then it's impossible to drag the
existing selection while the Control key is pressed. Ignore Ctrl+Press
events and let the corresponding release event toggle the selection.
Adjust the relevant test cases accordingly. The QItemDelegate test
case used a click+control event incorrectly, such an event doesn't
change the clicked state and should not be eaten, and now it does
change the selection, so fix the test.
Task-number: QTBUG-59888
Change-Id: Ia76126e31c28bc97d3e93e54965bdb1d0b8ac6a4
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Covers all selection modes and various combinations of mouse press, click,
drag, with or without modifiers.
Task-number: QTBUG-59888
Change-Id: Ib8ddc319a89649338d55fbc47e5a7ccfed338af9
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
After d6551fe125 it was no longer possible to start a drag with a
double click (where the first click selects an item, and the second
press+move starts the drag). Resetting the pressedItem variable to block
the emission of the clicked() signal had this unwanted side effect.
Instead, use an explicit boolean to store that the next release event
will be the result of a double click, so that the clicked() signal is not
emitted again (preventing the double-emission was the purpose of change
d6551fe125).
Task-number: QTBUG-77771
Fixes: QTBUG-94087
Pick-to: 6.1 5.15
Change-Id: I082c5169d89eb980dcd7985ef3d302b6ff060fb9
Reviewed-by: Samuel Gaist <samuel.gaist@idiap.ch>
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Olivier BARTHELEMY <perso.olivier.barthelemy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
When the PageDown is pressed, the current's rect cannot be
used to match the item, because we don't know the size of
the rect. Move the rect by the height of the viewport, and
then move the rect upwards until it matches the
button <= viewport's bottom of the item
Fixes: QTBUG-92583
Pick-to: 6.1
Change-Id: I210edc0e8b942984f3fc20e7752c6e1315152ea1
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
When the listview setWordWrap is true and ScrollBarPolicy is
ScrollBarAsNeeded, if the text needs a newline display and the
vbar is not shown, the width of the item was subtracted from
the width of the scrollbar.
In most cases, the listview needs to reserve the size of the scrollbar.
But if the flow is TopToBottom and the vertical scrollbar is not
visible, the width of the vertical scrollbar cannot be reserved.
Fixes: QTBUG-92366
Pick-to: 5.15 6.0 6.1
Change-Id: I73cce691099a253d409019dbb3fe9a16e1830bb1
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
For items that are children of other items, removeRows calls
beginRemoveRows directly and then once again inside takeChild()
The signal blocker that dates back to the monolitic import from Nokia
prevents the model from emitting extra signals
but the persistent indexes are corrupted nonetheless.
Fixes: QTBUG-90030
Pick-to: 6.1 6.0 5.15
Change-Id: I5bc4b2598bf13247683b113faeec22471f1f04a4
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
QTreeView's drawTree implementation performs lazy layouting
when calling itemDecorationAt. If animations are enabled,
this can change the list of items, and invalidate the copy
made earlier.
Don't copy the list of items, use a reference instead so that
code iterating over the items later operates on valid data.
Add an assert in the private itemHeight method, it must not
be called with an index that is out of bounds.
Fixes: QTBUG-42469
Pick-to: 6.0 6.1 5.15
Change-Id: Ifdb782881447912e00baffd1c407de10a1d8d0d4
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Extend and rename the pixmap() crash test to also verify
that a non-null pixmap is returned.
Change-Id: Ia972c4f705724cfa1394521a2dfd87451d9c5d64
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Wolff <oliver.wolff@qt.io>
The test was flaky in recent test runs on X11. Debugging
showed that the global position of the synthesized mouse
events was not correct due to the window not being mapped
properly. Use QTest::qWaitForWindowActive() instead of
QTest::qWaitForWindowExposed() to ensure that.
Task-number: QTBUG-90016
Pick-to: 5.15
Pick-to: 6.0
Change-Id: Ie1bc4157e6d0e807d8530f70dcbd27b5e2fc813c
Reviewed-by: Andy Shaw <andy.shaw@qt.io>
Remove the qmake project files for most of Qt.
Leave the qmake project files for examples, because we still test those
in the CI to ensure qmake does not regress.
Also leave the qmake project files for utils and other minor parts that
lack CMake project files.
Task-number: QTBUG-88742
Change-Id: I6cdf059e6204816f617f9624f3ea9822703f73cc
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Koehne <kai.koehne@qt.io>
QAbstractItemView::selectionCommand() returned the wrong SelectionFlags
when no event is given since c4366ff018.
Therefore re-add the call to QGuiApplication::keyboardModifiers() when
no event is given and add a unittest for them so it's not removed again.
Fixes: QTBUG-89711
Change-Id: I107357df08c4ff1b1a14d49523401c5e7b428f56
Pick-to: 6.0
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Complete search and replace of QtTest and QtTest/QtTest with QTest, as
QtTest includes the whole module. Replace all such instances with
correct header includes. See Jira task for more discussion.
Fixes: QTBUG-88831
Change-Id: I981cfae18a1cabcabcabee376016b086d9d01f44
Pick-to: 6.0
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Apparently some library definitions went overboard, link them directly.
Pick-to: 6.0
Change-Id: I009737f7e3edff5619241b700a627dc4e25e6018
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
QTableViewPrivate::heightHintForIndex()/widthHintForIndex() did not
honor spans and therefore returned too big values.
Fixes: QTBUG-89116
Change-Id: I52948902b7eaaa27c092ed39da68950c3840e8e4
Pick-to: 5.15
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
The hash and equality operators used need to be consistent with
each other. Unfortunately, QPMI::operator==() is not suitable to do
this. So specialize qHashEquals() for QPMI.
Fixes: QTBUG-88966
Change-Id: If5f19a722ae9fc4e78e93537e7ea15726f148768
Reviewed-by: Jarek Kobus <jaroslaw.kobus@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
(cherry picked from commit 83e95956ed58e88b11e2cc3cb61c5beacb7985db)
Reviewed-by: Qt Cherry-pick Bot <cherrypick_bot@qt-project.org>
QHeaderView sorting may be triggered when the user performs
some mouse interactions that should really not result in sorting.
Generally speaking, this happens when the user:
* presses on a non-movable section (A)
* moves on another section (B)
* releases on that section
resulting in B becoming sorted / flipping sorting.
(Non-movable is required, otherwise dragging would cause section moving,
not sorting.)
To make the matter worse, QHeaderView doesn't check that the release
happens within its geometry. This makes sense when moving sections: one
is able to drag a section horizontally/vertically even if the mouse
leaves the QHeaderView.
But when not moving sections, this means that one can
* press on section (A),
* move the mouse anywhere vertically (for a horizontal bar, mut.mut
for a vertical) above or below another section (B), that is,
outside QHeaderView's geometry
* release the mouse
and cause B to be sorted.
Fix it by
1) remembering which one was the section that the user originally
clicked on; that's the only one that can possibly become sorted
(if we're not moving and other conditions hold). No other variable
seemed to remember this.
2) on release, check that it happens within that section's geometry.
If so, sort.
Pick-to: 6.0 5.15
Change-Id: Icfb67662221efbde019711f933781ee1e7d9ac43
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
If one clicks on a QHeaderView's section, the header view will
sort the view by the respective column/row. By clicking multiple
times, one is able to toggle the sorting between ascending
and descending. Something that is NOT possible to do however is to
un-sort the view -- that is, to restore the model's original
sorting. This must be done via code, by asking the header or the
view to sort by section -1.
This commit adds new property to QHeaderView to make it possible
to unsort models. Basically, the sort indicator becomes a tri-state:
sort ascending, sort descending, unsort (sort by column -1).
[ChangeLog][QtWidgets][QHeaderView] Added the sortIndicatorClearable
property. Setting this property allows the user to clear the sort
indicator on a section, resetting the model to its default ordering.
Change-Id: Ibf4e280b2086b75ccd64d619ea4d70816dc3529f
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
These look like leftovers (API flaws).
Construction of QFileInfo from QString (or similar) should be not
implicit, as QFileInfo construction is expensive (might hit the file
system), and this may have users overlook APIs (for instance build a
QFileInfo out of QDirIterator::next(), instead of using ::fileInfo();
using QDir::entryList instead of entryInfoList; etc.).
Leave an opt-out mechanism to ease porting.
Fix a handful of usages around qtbase, with at least a couple of them
likely to be actual "sloppy" code.
[ChangeLog][Potentially Source-Incompatible Changes][QFileInfo] Most
QFileInfo constructors are now explicit. The
QT_IMPLICIT_QFILEINFO_CONSTRUCTION macro is provided to keep old code
working.
Change-Id: Ic580e6316e67edbc840aa0c60d98c7aaabaf1af6
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
QChar should not be convertible from any integral type except from
char16_t, short and possibly char (since it's a direct superset).
David provided the perfect example:
if (str == 123) { ~~~ }
compiles, with 123 implicitly converted to QChar (str == "123"
was meant instead). But similarly one can construct other
scenarios where QString(123) gets accidentally used (instead of
QString::number(123)), like QString s; s += 123;.
Add a macro to revert to the implicit constructors, for backwards
compatibility.
The breaks are mostly in tests that "abuse" of integers (arithmetic,
etc.). Maybe it's time for user-defined literals for QChar/QString,
but that is left for another commit.
[ChangeLog][Potentially Source-Incompatible Changes][QChar] QChar
constructors from integral types are now by default explicit.
It is recommended to use explicit conversions, QLatin1Char,
QChar::fromUcs4 instead of implicit conversions. The old behavior
can be restored by defining the QT_IMPLICIT_QCHAR_CONSTRUCTION
macro.
Change-Id: I6175f6ab9bcf1956f6f97ab0c9d9d5aaf777296d
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
It's unnecessary, and copying QEvents is a bad practice since it's a
polymorphic class.
Change-Id: Ieb6de106084f838c5e6c8a0643c54fd3c7f4a7a8
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
The test function only runs on X11, and this might help with the
asynchronous nature of the client/server architecture, also for
drag'n'drop.
Change-Id: I38db9104e304e57c36f84932d13f8dfae7452883
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
QLatin1String::arg (and QStringView::arg) only support string-like
arguments, and QLatin1String("%1").arg(123) does *not* produce
the string "123" -- 123 gets routed through the QChar(int) constructor
instead. Fix by using QString.
Change-Id: I96371a15e1af957ef8133e30e79eb3e22b3e9d32
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
We want to re-enable Android tests in QTQAINFRA-3867. However,
many tests are failing already preventing that from happening.
QTBUG-87025 is currently keeping track (links) to all of those
failing tests.
The current proposal is to hide those failing tests, and enable
Android test running in COIN for other tests. After, that try
to fix them one by one, and at the same time we can make sure
no more failing tests go unnoticed.
Task-number: QTBUG-87025
Change-Id: Ic1fe9fdd167cbcfd99efce9a09c69c344a36bbe4
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
It's been obsolete for a long time already. Make sure
the compiler now warns about it and remove all remaining
uses in qtbase.
Change-Id: I0ff80311184dba52d2ba5f4e2fabe0d47fdc59d7
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
If a model only allows MoveAction, then calls in the view/widget subclasses'
dropEvent implementation to set the event's drop action to CopyAction
will fail. QAbstractItemView will then remove the item when QDrag::exec
returns.
Instead of abusing the event actions for this, store explicitly that the
dropEvent implementation already moved the item. If the flag is set,
don't remove the item.
In QListView, which uses moveRow to move items in the dropEvent handler,
handle the case that the model might not implement moveRows. In that
case, or when dropping an item onto another item (to overwrite data),
fall back to the default implementation of QAbstractItemView. Sadly, it
is impossible to know whether a model doesn't implement moveRows, or
whether the move failed for other reasons, so this requires a bit of
extra special case handling. QListView in IconMode is particularly odd
in that it moves the item in the view, but not in the model.
This follows up on fd894fd68e and fixes
additional issues discovered during debugging. Extend the existing unit
test; since drag'n'drop runs a modal, native event loop on most systems,
it still only runs on the Xcb platform.
Change-Id: I6c5377e2b097c8080001afe904d6d3e4aed33df4
Pick-to: 5.15
Fixes: QTBUG-87057
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
tst_QApplication::sendEventsOnProcessEvents() and
tst_QItemDelegate::editorKeyPress()
There is some issue with the glib event dispatcher.
Task-number: QTBUG-87137
Pick-to: 5.15
Change-Id: I79a983192edef3c3560a4296cc9dea2dfc2ee1b0
Reviewed-by: Tony Sarajärvi <tony.sarajarvi@qt.io>
Use QScreen APIs instead.
Change-Id: Ie99af94fe4292223dbb165b3f5c1b74e8fe0498b
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
This time based on grepping to also include documentation, tests and
examples previously missed by the automatic tool.
Change-Id: Ied1703f4bcc470fbc275f759ed5b7c588a5c4e9f
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
QAbstractItemModel::canFetchMore and fetchMore implementations might only
add a few rows to the model each time they are called. The item views don't
generally expect that, and don't call fetchMore repeatedly, even if there
would be room in the itemview for more data. This problem cannot be
generally solved for all item views, as it would require in repeated expensive
laying out of items.
For nested indexes in a treeview however, we can try to fetch enough child
rows to populate the screen when the item is laid out by repeatedly
calling canFetchMore and fetchMore. To calculate how many items have space,
apply the same heuristics as in the scrollContentsBy implementation to
guess the number of items that can fit into the viewport.
Created test case for the fix.
Done-with: Doris Verria <doris.verria@qt.io>
Fixes: QTBUG-85366
Pick-to: 5.15
Change-Id: I54f95552993873dd4cba80b0f70f4db9d98ddc1d
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shaw <andy.shaw@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
Change lots of code to avoid the deprecated operator+() or implicit
casts to int.
Change-Id: I0c343cd5b28603afdf1214eefb85e928313345e2
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Modify special case locations to use the new API as well.
Clean up some stale .prev files that are not needed anymore.
Clean up some project files that are not used anymore.
Task-number: QTBUG-86815
Change-Id: I9947da921f98686023c6bb053dfcc101851276b5
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Adjust to changes to QIcon::pixmap, QMetaType::type, and
QAbstractItemView::itemDelegate.
Change-Id: I9eb0331ef899131afc86c33f27feeee76331ffc8
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Remove around 1000 compiler warnings about missing overrides
in our auto tests.
This significantly reduce the compiler warning noise in our auto
tests, so that one can actually better see the real problems
inbetween.
Change-Id: Id0c04dba43fcaf55d8cd2b5c6697358857c31bf9
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
It flaky fails for both normal and reverse cases.
Pick-to: 5.15
Task-number: QTBUG-41341
Change-Id: If6ecd6dc58f131bb67d46a5d508f59b6bb0fd962
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
When the view was already sorted by the column and order given to
sortByColumn(), a resort was not triggered which is a regression since
d0f909f8db.
Therefore don't rely on sortIndicatorChanged() in this case and trigger
an explicit sort as it's done when no user-triggered sorting is enabled
Fixes: QTBUG-86268
Change-Id: I3ec30ab81f304d5a19cef6d67b8a81c21b4a112d
Pick-to: 5.15
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
