The method was never tested, but it failed to compile after
QMultiHash was introduced as a separate class in 6.0.
This patch fixes it and adds some unit-tests to cover the case.
Task-number: QTBUG-91736
Pick-to: 6.2 6.1
Change-Id: I5dd989d4775efc6a9bb13c5ed1d892e499d95dc2
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Do not detach when find(key, value) is called on an empty QMultiHash.
As a drive-by: fix return value for QMultiHash::remove() in case of
empty QMultiHash.
Task-number: QTBUG-91736
Pick-to: 6.2 6.1
Change-Id: I1e32f359e7ee9ce8403dae79d02e0b88a20ec4a5
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
When the element you want to erase is the last element AND the
next element (element 0), when rehashed, would be relocated to the last
element, this leads to the state below. Which is similar to a test in
tst_qhash for some seeds.
auto it = hash.begin + (hash.size - 1)
it = hash.erase(it)
it != hash.end
By forcing the iterator to increment if we were erasing the last element
we always end up with a pointer which is equal to hash.end
Befriend the tst_qhash class so we can set the seed to a known-bad one
Pick-to: 6.2 6.1
Change-Id: Ie0b175003a2acb175ef5e3ab5a984e010f65d986
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
As QMultiHash uses a pointer for the data, nullptr dereference is a
thing, so check for valid d before doing anything in count()
Fixes: QTBUG-91704
Pick-to: 6.0 6.1
Change-Id: Ia20440cd7bdc03cb09c77f796fb9c5b52765eac5
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Those serve no purpose anymore, now that the .pro files are gone.
Task-number: QTBUG-88742
Change-Id: I39943327b8c9871785b58e9973e4e7602371793e
Reviewed-by: Cristian Adam <cristian.adam@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Kai Koehne <kai.koehne@qt.io>
Remove the qmake project files for most of Qt.
Leave the qmake project files for examples, because we still test those
in the CI to ensure qmake does not regress.
Also leave the qmake project files for utils and other minor parts that
lack CMake project files.
Task-number: QTBUG-88742
Change-Id: I6cdf059e6204816f617f9624f3ea9822703f73cc
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Koehne <kai.koehne@qt.io>
QMultiHash::equal_range crashes when called in a const member function.
The Data `d` is a NULL pointer when calling equal_range()
before inserting data into an empty QMultiHash.
Then calling`d->find` crashes.
Fixes: QTBUG-89687
Pick-to: 6.0
Change-Id: I10c3d196cbc72aed8c8c922ef16534bba51037b7
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Complete search and replace of QtTest and QtTest/QtTest with QTest, as
QtTest includes the whole module. Replace all such instances with
correct header includes. See Jira task for more discussion.
Fixes: QTBUG-88831
Change-Id: I981cfae18a1cabcabcabee376016b086d9d01f44
Pick-to: 6.0
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
In addition (and as a fallback) from requiring qHash, add support
for std::hash specializations. This catches two birds with one stone:
1) users of Qt can simply specialize std::hash for their datatypes,
and use them in both QHash and stdlib unordered associative containers;
2) we get QHash support for any (stdlib) datatype that is hashable
without having to overload qHash for them.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QHash] QHash, QMultiHash and QSet now support
for key types anything that can be hashed via std::hash, instead of
always requiring a qHash() overload.
Change-Id: Ib5ecba86e4b376d318389500bd24883ac6534c5f
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
QChar should not be convertible from any integral type except from
char16_t, short and possibly char (since it's a direct superset).
David provided the perfect example:
if (str == 123) { ~~~ }
compiles, with 123 implicitly converted to QChar (str == "123"
was meant instead). But similarly one can construct other
scenarios where QString(123) gets accidentally used (instead of
QString::number(123)), like QString s; s += 123;.
Add a macro to revert to the implicit constructors, for backwards
compatibility.
The breaks are mostly in tests that "abuse" of integers (arithmetic,
etc.). Maybe it's time for user-defined literals for QChar/QString,
but that is left for another commit.
[ChangeLog][Potentially Source-Incompatible Changes][QChar] QChar
constructors from integral types are now by default explicit.
It is recommended to use explicit conversions, QLatin1Char,
QChar::fromUcs4 instead of implicit conversions. The old behavior
can be restored by defining the QT_IMPLICIT_QCHAR_CONSTRUCTION
macro.
Change-Id: I6175f6ab9bcf1956f6f97ab0c9d9d5aaf777296d
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Reaches into the internals to avoid erasing one entry at a time from the
QHash.
Change-Id: I47079592d130d2ecd844998dfa31e633e049d4c1
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
And add a QMultiHash::unite(const QHash &) method to avoid
a copy of the data when inserting a QHash into a multi hash.
Change-Id: I864aa9d2b9b7b2c367c3c4d140a2ce2f5408ae09
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The old code was trying to convert a multi hash to a QHash. While
that worked in Qt 5 it won't compile in Qt 6 anymore.
QHashCombineCommutative also can't be used with a std::pair.
ADL won't find the correct instance with a namespaced build,
as qHash(std::pair) is defined after QHashCommutative. Fix
the code to compile and work correctly.
Change-Id: Ice2bc3ab4244e310cbbb5e0f31fc11eb14f5faf3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Modify special case locations to use the new API as well.
Clean up some stale .prev files that are not needed anymore.
Clean up some project files that are not used anymore.
Task-number: QTBUG-86815
Change-Id: I9947da921f98686023c6bb053dfcc101851276b5
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Use pro2cmake with '--api-version 2' to force regenerate
projects to use the new prefixed qt_foo APIs.
Change-Id: I055c4837860319e93aaa6b09d646dda4fc2a4069
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
There is no reason for keep using our macro now that we have C++17.
The macro itself is left in for the moment being, as well as its
detection logic, because it's needed for C code (not everything
supports C11 yet). A few more cleanups will arrive in the next few
patches.
Note that this is a mere search/replace; some places were using
double braces to work around the presence of commas in a macro, no
attempt has been done to fix those.
tst_qglobal had just some minor changes to keep testing the macro.
Change-Id: I1c1c397d9f3e63db3338842bf350c9069ea57639
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
At the same time use the opportunity to refactor the
insertion code inside the implementation of QHash to
avoid copy and move constructors as much as possible
and always construct nodes in place.
Change-Id: I951b4cf2c77a17f7db825c6a776aae38c2662d23
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
This is required, so that QHash and QSet can hold more
than 2^32 items on 64 bit platforms.
The actual hashing functions for strings are still 32bit, this will
be changed in a follow-up commit.
Change-Id: I4372125252486075ff3a0b45ecfa818359fe103b
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
A brand new QHash implementation using a faster and more memory efficient data
structure than the old QHash.
A new implementation for QHash. Instead of a node based approach as the old
QHash, this implementation now uses a two stage lookup table. The total
amount of buckets in the table are divided into spans of 128 entries.
Inside each span, we use an array of chars to index into a storage area
for the span.
The storage area for each span is a simple array, that gets (re-)allocated
with size increments of 16 items. This gives an average memory overhead of
8*sizeof(struct{ Key; Value; }) + 128*sizeof(char) + 16 for each span.
To give good performance and avoid too many collisions, the array keeps its
load factor between .25 and .5 (and grows and rehashes if the load factor goes
above .5).
This design allows us to keep the memory overhead of the Hash very small, while
at the same time giving very good performance. The calculated overhead for a
QHash<int, int> comes to 1.7-3.3 bytes per entry and to 2.2-4.3 bytes for
a QHash<ptr, ptr>.
The new implementation also completely splits the QHash and QMultiHash classes.
One behavioral change to note is that the new QHash implementation will not
provide stable references to nodes in the hash when the table needs to grow.
Benchmarking using https://github.com/Tessil/hash-table-shootout shows
very nice performance compared to many different hash table implementation.
Numbers shown below are for a hash<int64, int64> with 1 million entries. These
numbers scale nicely (mostly in a linear fashion with some variation due to
varying load factors) to smaller and larger tables. All numbers are in seconds,
measured with gcc on Linux:
Hash table random random random random reads full
insertion insertion full full after iteration
(reserved) deletes reads deletes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
std::unordered_map 0,3842 0,1969 0,4511 0,1300 0,1169 0,0708
google::dense_hash_map 0,1091 0,0846 0,0550 0,0452 0,0754 0,0160
google::sparse_hash_map 0,2888 0,1582 0,0948 0,1020 0,1348 0,0112
tsl::sparse_map 0,1487 0,1013 0,0735 0,0448 0,0505 0,0042
old QHash 0,2886 0,1798 0,5065 0,0840 0,0717 0,1387
new QHash 0,0940 0,0714 0,1494 0,0579 0,0449 0,0146
Numbers for hash<std::string, int64>, with the string having 15 characters:
Hash table random random random random reads
insertion insertion full full after
(reserved) deletes reads deletes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
std::unordered_map 0,4993 0,2563 0,5515 0,2950 0,2153
google::dense_hash_map 0,2691 0,1870 0,1547 0,1125 0,1622
google::sparse_hash_map 0,6979 0,3304 0,1884 0,1822 0,2122
tsl::sparse_map 0,4066 0,2586 0,1929 0,1146 0,1095
old QHash 0,3236 0,2064 0,5986 0,2115 0,1666
new QHash 0,2119 0,1652 0,2390 0,1378 0,0965
Memory usage numbers (in MB for a table with 1M entries) also look very nice:
Hash table Key int64 std::string (15 chars)
Value int64 int64
---------------------------------------------------------
std::unordered_map 44.63 75.35
google::dense_hash_map 32.32 80,60
google::sparse_hash_map 18.08 44.21
tsl::sparse_map 20.44 45,93
old QHash 53.95 69,16
new QHash 23.23 51,32
Fixes: QTBUG-80311
Change-Id: I5679734144bc9bca2102acbe725fcc2fa89f0dff
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This patch adds the arrow operator to the stl-like key-value
iterator (QKeyValueIterator) for QMap and QHash.
This allows using normal member access syntax it->first and it->second
instead of having to use (*it).first and (*it).second.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][Containers] Added operator-> to the key-value
iterator for QHash/QMap.
Change-Id: I9cfa6480784ebce147fcfbf37fec5ad0080e2899
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Fanaskov <vitaly.fanaskov@qt.io>
This pulls the CMake port, which not only adds CMake files but also
modifies existing code. A brief summary of "seemingly unrelated" changes:
* configure.json was re-formatted to not use multi-line strings. That
is an extension of the Qt JSON parser but not JSON compliant, which
is needed for the configure.json-to-cmake conversion script (python).
* Some moc inclusions were added due to CMake's slightly different way
of handling moc. With the changes the files build with qmake and cmake.
* Since CMake just grep's for the Q_OBJECT macro to determine whether to
call moc (instead of doing pre-processing like qmake), the existing use
of "Q_OBJECT" in our documentation was changed to \Q_OBJECT, which cmake
doesn't see and which is now a qdoc macro.
* QTestLib's qFindTestData was extended to also search in the source
directory known at build time.
What this change also brings is a new way of building modules in Coin by using
YAML configuration files that describe the steps of building and testing in Coin
specific terms. The platform configuration files in qt5 are instructed to use the
old Coin built-in way of testing ("UseLegacyInstructions" feature) but for any
configurations that do not have this, these yaml files in the coin/ sub-directory
are used and shared across repositories.
Change-Id: I1d832c3400e8d6945ad787024ba60e7440225c08
A couple of tests in the QHash autotest could iterate beyond
end(), leading to undefined behavior. This is bound to crash
with the new upcoming QHash implementation.
Change-Id: I977fc939e6e472f05b7cb2fa0a79c2d5f8782f45
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
Prepare the test cases so that QHash and QMultiHash are used
as if they were fully independent classes.
Change-Id: Iaf5d65c8f6321ec2edaef490e657b144619655a0
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
As opposed to unite(), this inserts one hash into the other
without duplicating elements.
Change-Id: Ifc786c48f5dc3ab18c29782e73eac3c1a3ef8981
Reviewed-by: Anton Kudryavtsev <antkudr@mail.ru>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
The support for unsharable containers has been deprecated
since Qt 5.3.0, so let's finally remove support for them.
Change-Id: I9be31f55208ae4750e8020b10b6e4ad7e8fb3e0e
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
... except for tests, which manually undefine the macro.
Like QT_NO_FOREACH, this is a technical way to keep JSI-free
modules JSI-free going forward.
Change-Id: Icf1342da00a700f42f9e32a253d1cdb94c38dd7e
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Fix warnings:
Using QCharRef with an index pointing outside the valid range of a QString. The corresponding behavior is deprecated, and will be changed in a future version of Qt.
introduced by qtbase/c2d2757bccc68e1b981df059786c2e76f2969530 (5.14).
Change-Id: Ie6f0e2e3bb198a95dd40e7416adc8ffb29f3b2ba
Reviewed-by: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This patch implements an iterator that returns a pair containing both the
key and the value of an entry in QHash/QMap.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][Containers] Added an stl-like iterator to go through
QHash/QMap returning both the key and the value of the element pointed to.
That lets QHash/QMap interoperate better with stl's algorithms like
std::set_union.
Change-Id: Idbf8a8581510b3493648c34ab04c556de9fa4aa7
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
The existing QHash::operator== does not work when the same
keys appear in different order between the two hashes being compared.
However, relying on iteration order on a QHash is (as usual) a bad
idea and one should never do it.
Task-number: QTBUG-60395
Change-Id: Ifb39a6779230e26bbd6fdba82ccc0247b9cdc6ed
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
The hash function is carefully designed to give the same result
as the straight-forward implementation of qHash(unordered_map),
which we'll probably add at some point, namely: std::accumulate
over a container of std::pair.
This is one reason to use std:: and not QPair in the implemen-
tation of qHash(QHash). The other is that qHash(QPair) uses a
bad hash combiner, which may xor out the 'seed' from the result.
We can't fix that until Qt 6, but the qHash(std::pair) overload
uses the well-known boost::hash_combine algorithm (implemented
in Qt as QtPrivate::QHashCombine), so we can use that.
I also trust std::pair to work without problems with reference
template arguments, while QPair only very recently gained a very
basic auto-test for reference parameters.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added qHash() overloads for QHash, QMultiHash.
Change-Id: I90879d8a99cf1aadb6e84ecc0c3704f52f3691da
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
The C and C++ standards say it's undefined whether the preprocessor
supports macros that expand to defined() will operate as an ifdef.
Clang 3.9 started complaining about that fact.
One solution was to change QT_SUPPORTS to check for zero or one, which
means we need to change the #defines QT_NO_xxx to #define QT_NO_xxx 1.
The C standard says we don't need to #define to 0, as an unknown token
is interpreted as zero. However, that might produce a warning (GCC with
-Wundef), so changing the macro this way is not recommended.
Instead, we deprecate the macro and replace the uses with #ifdef/ndef.
Change-Id: Id75834dab9ed466e94c7ffff1444874d5680b96a
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Similar to QMap::equal_range().
Will allow to easily fix inefficient code such as:
foreach (auto value, hash.values(key)) { ... }
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QHash] Added QHash::equal_range()
Change-Id: I6e19e25de632e897ad83d3141d9d07f0313f7200
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
From Qt 5.7 -> tools & applications are lisenced under GPL v3 with some
exceptions, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new GPL-EXCEPT header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under GPL 3 with exceptions)
Change-Id: I42a473ddc97101492a60b9287d90979d9eb35ae1
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
Prefer QCOMPARE over QVERIFY for equality and use QLatin1String().
Change-Id: If226a0fc7b25be3e6774c7e36ca1e6f99234e5dd
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@theqtcompany.com>