Updated moveNonPod function to behave correctly under
exceptions being thrown. This is the version that was implemented
at some point but then got changed prior to merge. Added tests for
moveInGrowthDirection (which uses moveNonPod in general case) to
verify that range movements are correctly done
Updated QCommonArrayOps access modifier from private to protected
to allow testing of internal stuff by subclassing
Task-number: QTBUG-84320
Change-Id: Idb994a72ee601762e32248670cdc7819aaca0088
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Scoped GrowsBackwards-optimized erase to only be applied
when erase starts at the beginning of the element range.
In other cases, old "left-shifting" erase is used to align
with std::vector::erase invalidation policy
Task-number: QTBUG-84320
Change-Id: I2e7f3b96b056bc371119eb2d36cc7c74af52c394
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Gives it its own changed signal, and simplifies setting from group,
while fixing an inconsistency in propagation.
Change-Id: I22b243210260a8878144fa4b60204df46f847f37
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
I still have doubts that QEventPoint can't be made small enough that
copying would be cheaper than reference-counting and all the indirections
in now-noninline accessors, but this gives us the usual freedom to
change the data members later on.
Change-Id: I792f7fc85ac3a9538589da9d7618b647edf0e70c
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Before, we used not so accurate QTest::qWait(50)
to measure the accuracy of more precise timer's interval.
In addition, the checked range for remainingTime (50, 200)
was probably wrong, since by definition it couldn't be more than 150,
as we started the timer with interval of 200 and waited at least 50.
In this fix we have additional "tester" timer to measure remainingTime
of "tested" timer. The "tester" is a singleShot timer with interval of
50, and is started together with "tested" timer. Whenever the "tested"
timer timeouts, it restarts the "tester" timer - this is done desired
number of times (2 by default, like in the original test).
The test itself lies now inside tester's lambda. We fix the tested
range (at least 1, no more than 150). The minimum value could in
theory be greater, but it's enough to test that it's not overdue.
Finally, we wait for expected number of test runs. We give it twice
as much time as is in theory needed.
Task-number: QTBUG-83419
Task-number: QTBUG-58519
Change-Id: I43836d787d804f22bb66515ebb215d040189c4f3
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
It flaky fails for both normal and reverse cases.
Pick-to: 5.15
Task-number: QTBUG-41341
Change-Id: If6ecd6dc58f131bb67d46a5d508f59b6bb0fd962
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
[ChangeLog][Source-Incompatible Changes] QProcess::setupChildProcess()
was removed. To execute code in a child process, use
QProcess::setChildProcessModifier()
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QProcess] Added setChildProcessModifier() function
with which one can provide code to be run in the Unix child process
between fork() and execve(). With this function, it is no longer
necessary to derive from QProcess in order to execute actions in the
child process.
Another reason is that we can tell whether the std::function carries a
valid target much more easily than we can tell whether QProcess was
overridden.
The setupChildProcess() virtual function does not need to be marked
final, since no overrider could ever return an inaccessible private
class. This also makes sure the error presented to the user is about the
return type, not about attempting to override a final.
Clang:
error: virtual function 'f' has a different return type ('void') than the function it overrides (which has return type 'QProcess::Use_setChildProcessModifier_Instead')
GCC:
error: conflicting return type specified for 'virtual void MyProcess::setupChildProcess()'
note: overridden function is 'virtual QProcess::Use_setChildProcessModifier_Instead QProcess::setupChildProcess()'
ICC:
error: return type is neither identical to nor covariant with return type "QProcess::Use_setChildProcessModifier_Instead" of overridden virtual function "QProcess::setupChildProcess"
MSVC is not relevant since it doesn't compile to Unix.
Change-Id: Ia8b65350cd5d49debca9fffd15f801161363aea7
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
QDateTime::toString uses the C locale since 5ba66c5622
So don't expect locale specific day- and month-names.
Task-number: QTBUG-80441
Change-Id: I08f53b6b33ed9e7eaaa58df4ca6a966c4ba9ef24
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Because we removed public setters from QTouchEvent and QEventPoint in
4e400369c0 and now it's proposed to give
QEventPoint a d-pointer again, the implementation of QTouchEventSequence
needs to start using QMutableEventPoint: being a friend will no longer
be enough, because the member variables won't be accessible in the future.
But because we have separate test libs for Gui and Widgets, it needs to
be further refactored into two classes.
Change-Id: I0bfc0978fc4187348ac872e1330d95259d557b69
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
The fix ensures that it can find the column for the array correctly
when reading/writing and also handles the integer typed arrays correctly
too.
Pick-to: 5.15
Fixes: QTBUG-83409
Change-Id: I92d982bdf0927e6ebc6dce84fec9ad6c44c26c25
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
Following the introduction of QKeyCombination, reduce the number
of warnings raised by the test. Drive-by, remove some pointless
math like Qt::SHIFT+0, which does not make any sense and would
actually fail to compile (shortly).
Refactoring the test to fully use QKeyCombination (instead of
ints) is left as a future exercise; some QKeyCombination->int
warnings are still around.
Change-Id: If825bc4c369986623447927bb11493c4f58b544f
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Instead of QCoreApplication::quit() directly calling exit(0), which would
leave QGuiApplication and client code out of the loop, we now send the
Quit event, and let it pass through event delivery, before finally ending
up in QCoreApplication::event(), where we call exit(0).
This has the advantage that QGuiApplication can ensure all windows are
closed before quitting, and if any of those windows ignore the close
event the quit will be aborted. This aligns the behavior of synthetic
quits via QCoreApplication::quit() with spontaneous quits from the
platform via QGuiApplicationPrivate::processApplicationTermination.
Clients who wish to exit the application without any event delivery or
potential user interaction can call the lower level exit() function
directly.
[ChangeLog][QtGui] Application termination via qApp->quit() will now
deliver Quit events to the application, which in turn will result in
application windows being closed as part of the application quit,
with an option to cancel the application quit by ignoring the close
event. Clients who explicitly want to exit the application without
any user interaction should call QCoreApplication::exit() explicitly.
Task-number: QTBUG-45262
Task-number: QTBUG-33235
Task-number: QTBUG-72013
Task-number: QTBUG-59782
Change-Id: Id4b3907e329b9ecfd936fe9a5f8a70cb66b76bb7
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Make QTBF ready for Qt6 by using qsizetype in the API and use
QStringView where it makes sense.
Change the exported API of qunicodetools to use QStringView as
well and use char16_t internally.
Change-Id: I853537bcabf40546a8e60fdf2ee7d751bc371761
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
QStyleOptionGraphicsItem::matrix and levelOfDetail are deprecated and
not used anywhere anymore.
Change-Id: Id4b0fa8ac3ac53d771e858ecda5524a5e690342d
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
In some places needs to be ordered before const/constexpr though.
Change-Id: I57a521ac0ad22b5a018761c4d52befbef69d64c0
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Calibrated to match F16C and ARM-FP16 hardware conversions.
Change-Id: I3bdd4d3db3046fee4aeb24e4ce8b9bc9a06e0397
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Just starting 20 threads to test this won't cut it if
the machine you're testing on has an ideal thread count
of 16 or larger.
Change-Id: Icba8f00aa836fec6da41c71b318e9e17bdd47c0e
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
This is a source incompatible change for widget implementors.
Leaving the old enterEvent as a virtual overload is problematic due to
shadowing. Best to make a clean cut, widget reimplementors will get a compile
time warning if they mark their override as such, or if they try to call the
parent class implementation.
Addresses ### Qt 6 comment.
[ChangeLog][QtWidgets][QWidget] The virtual enterEvent handler now receives
a QEnterEvent, which contains information about mouse position and button
states, rather than a plain QEvent.
Change-Id: I233f594fd79c0c090983b3db8532913d00132fde
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Adjusting the QPrinter test case - some use cases no longer exist, or are
already tested in QPageSize and QPageLayout tests.
Adjust examples and manual tests.
Change-Id: I01cbc65f3d8031aea2dac86dd942126ba708b111
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Since waiting for a spy employs polling, it may happen
that while waiting for a startedSpy we had received already
a signal for finishedSpy. This explains current flakiness.
The fix is to connect to lambdas instead and update
the hit count accordingly. Inside lambdas we also
ensure the correct order for started / finised signals.
After waitForFinished() unblocks we ensure that possible
pending asynchronous signals (started / finished) are processed
and check the final state.
Task-number: QTBUG-83076
Change-Id: I16963ef9c011cb613d7b409d3e3032303a942336
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Addresses ### Qt 6 comment, and documentation pointing out that the parameter
value is ignored. It wasn't ignored in the code, but that's the kind of change
we can make now.
With this change, QUnifiedTimer::updateAnimationTimers is only called with -1
as the currentTick input parameter, also from Qt Declarative. Make it default,
so that leaf modules can be fixed. Once that it done, the parameter can be
removed completely.
Change-Id: I80c57ff92f3b615b932dd73d711cf6397347efd8
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
In 3558704ed5, we added code to
support old .ui files which used the old integer scale for font
weights by checking for a special attribute which would help
separate new and old files.
Since then, it has become apparent that the weight element in
.ui is not actually used for anything, since it is only emitted
when the bold flag is set and always has to match QFont::Bold
in these cases.
So instead of converting, we simply ignore it now, and respect
the bold flag instead.
This also reverts the changes to ui4.* in uic, since the
scale attribute is no longer needed.
Task-number: QTBUG-42248
Change-Id: I1898868b58004099590f4eaf01f24c57bd34d779
Reviewed-by: Jarek Kobus <jaroslaw.kobus@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
C++20 via P1120 is deprecating arithmetic operations between
unrelated enumeration types, and GCC 10 is already complaining.
Hence, these operations might become illegal in C++23 or C++26 at
the latest.
A case of this that affects Qt is in key combinations: a
QKeySequence can be constructed by summing / ORing modifiers and a
key, for instance:
Qt::CTRL + Qt::Key_A
Qt::SHIFT | Qt::CTRL | Qt::Key_G (recommended, see below)
The problem is that the modifiers and the key belong to different
enumerations (and there's 2 enumerations for the modifier, and one
for the key).
To solve this: add a dedicated class to represent a combination of
keys, and operators between those enumerations to build instances
of this class.
I would've simply defined operator|, but again docs and pre-existing
code use operator+ as well, so added both to at least tackle simple
cases (modifier + key).
Multiple modifiers create a problem: operator+ between them yields
int, not the corresponding flags type (because operator+ is not
overloaded for this use case):
Qt::CTRL + Qt::SHIFT + Qt::Key_A
\__________________/ /
int /
\______________/
int
Not only this loses track of the datatypes involved, but it would
also then "add" the key (with NO warnings, now its int + enum, so
it's not mixing enums!) and yielding int again.
I don't want to special-case this; the point of the class is
that int is the wrong datatype. Everything works just fine when
using operator| instead:
Qt::CTRL | Qt::SHIFT | Qt::Key_A
\__________________/ /
Qt::Modifiers /
\______________/
QKeyCombination
So I'm defining operator+ so that the simple cases still work,
but also deprecating it.
Port some code around Qt to the new class. In certain cases,
it's a huge win for clarity. In some others, I've just added
the necessary casts to make it still compile without warnings,
without attempting refactorings.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QKeyCombination] New class to represent
a combination of a key and zero or more modifiers, to be used
when defining shortcuts or similar.
[ChangeLog][Potentially Source-Incompatible Changes] A keyboard
modifier (such as Qt::CTRL, Qt::AltModifier, etc.) should be
combined with a key (such as Qt::Key_A, Qt::Key_F1, etc.) by using
operator|, not operator+. The result is now an object of type
QKeyCombination, that stores the key and the modifiers.
Change-Id: I657a3a328232f059023fff69c5031ee31cc91dd6
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
The qmake parser of pro2cmake handles completely commented lines to make
assignments like this work:
SUBDIRS = \
foo \
# bar \
bar
However, assignments like
SUBDIRS = \
foo \
#bar \
bar
were cut off at the commented line.
Fix this by allowing leading whitespace for "fully commented lines".
Change-Id: Ib5de850a02fd9b9ebb7c056c2f64f9d684334b08
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Traditionally when calling reserve it's because you expect to append
up to X amount of bytes. We should keep that behavior the same.
With another patch still in the works current behavior caused an issue
with QStringBuilder in QNAM, as mirrored in the testcase attached.
Change-Id: I9792a8f158fc9235e3de48ac8b06ac2c10e7f3dc
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Views / delegates absolutely *adore* hammering data(). A simple
QListView showing a couple of dozens entries can call data()
a hundred of times on the first show.
Back of the hand calculation,
* 2 times per visible item (sizeHint() + paint()),
* times 9 roles used by the default delegate,
* times 20 visible items
= 360 as a bare minimum, assuming the view doesn't redraw twice
accidentally. Move the mouse over the view, and that'll cause
a full update with certain styles: 360 calls to data() per update.
This has an overhead visible in profilers. The model's data()
has to re-fetch the index from its data structure and extract
the requested field every time.
Also, QVariant is used for the data interexchange,
meaning anything that won't fit in one is also a memory allocation.
This problem will likely be gone in Qt6Variant as that
will store sizeof(void*) * 3, meaning QImage/QPixmap and similar
polymorphic classes will fit in a QVariant now...
So I'm trying to to remove part of that overhead by allowing
views to request all the data they need in one go. For now,
one index a a time.
A view might also store the data returned. The idea is that
the same role on different indexes will _very likely_
return variants of the same type. So a model could move-assign
the data into the variant, avoiding the memory allocation
/deallocation for the variant's private.
This patch:
1) Introduces QModelRoleData as a holder for role+data.
2) Introduces QModelRoleDataSpan as a span over QModelRoleData.
The idea of a span type is twofold. First and foremost, we are
in no position to choose which kind of container a view should
use to store the QModelRoleData objects for a multiData() call;
a span abstracts any contiguous sequence, leaving the view free
to do whatever it wants (statically allocate, use a vector, etc.).
It also solves the problem of efficient passing the roles and
gathering the returned variants from multiData().
3) Add multiData(), which populates a span of roles for a given
model index. The main advantage here is that a model can fetch
all the needed information for a given index just once, then
iterate on the span and provide data for each requested role.
Cf. this with data(), where every call has to re-fetch
the information for the index.
A couple of models have been ported to multiData(), as well as
QStyledItemDelegate.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QModelRoleData] New class.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QModelRoleDataSpan] New class.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QAbstractItemModel] Added the multiData()
function.
Change-Id: Icce0d108ad4e156c9fb05c83ce6df5f58f99f118
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
When the view was already sorted by the column and order given to
sortByColumn(), a resort was not triggered which is a regression since
d0f909f8db.
Therefore don't rely on sortIndicatorChanged() in this case and trigger
an explicit sort as it's done when no user-triggered sorting is enabled
Fixes: QTBUG-86268
Change-Id: I3ec30ab81f304d5a19cef6d67b8a81c21b4a112d
Pick-to: 5.15
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
So far QPropertyAlias was limited to working with QProperty<T>.
Change the implementation, so it can be constructed from any
property or even a QBindable<T>.
Change-Id: I175cffe94a9ef332367d39faa976eb065b0e6ffe
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Add a new BINDABLE declaration to the Q_PROPERTY() macro that tells moc
where to find the QBindable for the property.
Add a QUntypedBindable base class to QBindable<T> that gives access to
generic functionality and checks argument compatibility at runtime.
QBindable<T> will still do static checking at compile time.
Add QMetaProperty::isBindable() and QMetaProperty::bindable()
to be able to dynamically access the binding functionality.
Change-Id: Ic7b08ae2cde83fd43e627d813a886e1de01fa3dc
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Add a compatibility property class that makes porting to the new
property system as simple as possible.
Binding evaluation for those compat properties is eager, as we
do not control possible side effects of the code in the existing
setters.
Change-Id: Ic56347abb49e40631ec73e88c6d40d4bdb05ca29
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Add a QObjectComputedProperty. This class doesn't store the data
itself, instead relies on a getter method to compute it's value.
As the property is read-only, one can not bind to it, but it can
be used in other property bindings.
Change-Id: I0f6bffdd9f80f1d0829826f93a47257f2b3127af
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Add Q_OBJECT_BINDABLE_PROPERTY() macro that can be used to define
a bindable property inside QObject.
The macro and the class behind it creates storage for a property
that is bindable inside a QObject or QObjectPrivate. The property
only uses as much space as the data contained, ie. it has no
storage overhead, as long as no bindings are being used.
Bindings are being stored and looked up in the QBindingStorage
associated with the owning object.
Change-Id: I1dadd7bddbad6fbf10cfa791d6461574b9db82dd
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
QBindingStorage is a class that can store a set of binding objects
for the properties of a QObject. This will get used to reduce the
memory overhead of the property system when adding bindable properties
to QObject based classes.
The binding storage has a pointer to the TLS entry containing the
currently evaluating binding. Like that we avoid repeated TLS
lookups and reduce the overhead of the property system to one
pointer lookup and one compare for the case that properties
aren't being used.
Each QObject now owns one binding storage object, that can be used to
store binding data for properties that members of the QObject.
Change-Id: I27427c03c2ba281f072e074be96147bdbcaac246
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Add a private QBindableInterface and a public QBindable<T>
class, that will be the API interface for accessing bindings
for properties in QObject.
The QBindable class gives access to all aspects of
the property related to bindings. This includes setting
and retrieving bindings, installing observers and creating
a direct binding on this property.
Change-Id: Iaead54d2bd6947bd2cda5052142b2a47dd8bf7c4
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
These look rather weird, an explicit property.setBinding() call
is simply better in this case, and also more aligned with the API
we can offer in QObject.
Change-Id: Ifb00fd47a75e6b3bc94e34bf49e4f13249565bfe
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
And all related functionality. This is being replaced by
Q_BINDABLE_PROPERTY and Q_OBJECT_BINDABLE_PROPERTY in the
next few commits. The new infrastructure coming will play
nicer along with the existing property system.
Commented out some autotests, that will get reimplemented
with the updated infrastructure.
Change-Id: I50c30bd4d5c6c6b6471f8eb93870e27d86f5a009
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Rename QPropertyBase to QPropertyBindingData, as it contains the
data related to bindings. The new name fits better, as the data
can now also live somewhere else than the data strored in the
property.
Change-Id: I489efb86ad2e0bad2740c9d1aa74506fe103d343
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Since we will be storing property data differently in most cases,
having this special case would create too many additional complications.
Change-Id: I27042b0730559bb375d8e3c07324398403a9885d
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Enable the arrow operator for all types that could have members, so
that one can e.g. write myStringProperty->size() instead of having to
use the less convenient myStringProperty.value().size().
Also cleaned up the rvalue ref overloads to be
disabled for basic types. For those we now also
return by value, for more complex types we
return a const reference.
Change-Id: If6a75898dc0a097f57052488f0af0cd7166b3393
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
If one needed to listen to a signal just once, one had to
store the QMetaObject::Connection object returned by connect()
and use it to disconnect the slot after the first signal
activation.
This has led to a proliferation of using wrappers (and enough
TMP); they usually look like this:
1) create a shared_ptr<QMO::Connection>, allocating its payload;
2) create a lambda, capturing the shared_ptr by value;
3) in the lambda, disconnect the connection (through the shared_ptr),
and call the actual slot;
4) connect the signal to the lambda, storing the returned
QMO::Connection into the shared_ptr.
This is expensive, error prone for newcomers, and tricky to
support as a general facility inside one's projects.
We can do better, just support single shot connections right
in QObject.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QObject] Added the Qt::SingleShotConnection
flag. When a connection is established with this flag set,
the slot is going to be activated at most once; when the signal
is emitted, the connection gets automatically broken by Qt.
Change-Id: I5f5feeae7f76c9c3d6323d841efba81c8f98ce7e
Fixes: QTBUG-44219
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
One could guess it by assuming that disconnecting for a destroyed
receiver and disconnect() with given receiver use the same
implementation, but without closely knowing the implementation a
reader of the documentation can't know for sure.
Also add a test to prove that what the new documentation says is
really true.
Also remove an unnecessary negation in the preceding sentence.
Change-Id: I9d24442bb1a4646b89f969bad1a4d0e1eafa7534
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
