Qt copyrights are now in The Qt Company, so we could update the source
code headers accordingly. In the same go we should also fix the links to
point to qt.io.
Outdated header.LGPL removed (use header.LGPL21 instead)
Old header.LGPL3 renamed to header.LGPL3-COMM to match actual licensing
combination. New header.LGPL-COMM taken in the use file which were
using old header.LGPL3 (src/plugins/platforms/android/extract.cpp)
Added new header.LGPL3 containing Commercial + LGPLv3 + GPLv2 license
combination
Change-Id: I6f49b819a8a20cc4f88b794a8f6726d975e8ffbe
Reviewed-by: Matti Paaso <matti.paaso@theqtcompany.com>
Showing, moving and resizing
Contrarily to what an NSWindow does to its NSViews, child NSWindows need
to be explicitly shown and hidden, and clipped if the parent NSWindow
changes geometry. Also, hiding an NSWindow will not hide its child
windows. This needed to be managed manually, adding 2 additional states
to QCocoaWindow to reflect whether a child window has been clipped out by
any ancestor geometry change, or hidden by any ancestor being hid. Also,
ordering out an NSWindow will remove it fromm its parent's child windows
array, making necessary to maintain a parallel list of child windows in
QCocoaWindow.
Stack order
Although child NSWindows can be ordered relatively to each other, they
need to be added again to be moved lower in the window stack. This also
means the windows above it need to be added on top.
Key (focus) status
One of the remaining issues, is to make sure the top level window keeps
the "key status" while still forwarding key events to the child window.
Keeping same event propagation
This use case is best illustrated with undocking QDockWidgets (if these
are child NSWindows). The main issue is to make sure the QDockArea will
get the mouse events right after undocking a dock widget. We used a similar
workaround as the "key status" problem, and manually forward the mouse
events to the dock area's QWindow.
Manual test, by Morten Johan Sørvig, included.
Task-number: QTBUG-33082
Task-number: QTBUG-22815
Change-Id: I50e34936fb82bff013e99f4bcb3bd0db0704c6ae
Reviewed-by: Morten Johan Sørvig <morten.sorvig@digia.com>
the diff -w for this commit is empty.
Started-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Change-Id: I77bb84e71c63ce75e0709e5b94bee18e3ce6ab9e
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This test actually passes using the "xcb" platform and fails otherwise.
Second, the Jira task is misleading since it refers to
tst_QFocusEvent::checkReason_Shortcut()
Change-Id: Icab91ace8c214d958b534c5cebae900242522372
Reviewed-by: Caroline Chao <caroline.chao@digia.com>
Change copyrights and license headers from Nokia to Digia
Change-Id: If1cc974286d29fd01ec6c19dd4719a67f4c3f00e
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergio Ahumada <sergio.ahumada@digia.com>
Qt 5.0 beta requires changing the default to the 5.0 API, disabling
the deprecated code. However, tests should test (and often do) the
compatibility API too, so turn it back on.
Task-number: QTBUG-25053
Change-Id: I8129c3ef3cb58541c95a32d083850d9e7f768927
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Remove usages from autotests with the exception of
widgets/kernel, widgets/widgets and widgets/graphicsview.
Change-Id: I917b2857ed0cd07a6b3dbcd69244f558086c6586
Reviewed-by: Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly@kdab.com>
This test has one stable failure. Mark that failure with QEXPECT_FAIL
and re-enable the test.
Task-number: QTBUG-22815
Change-Id: I38445b659235076b00d9dd82d2a824d1caa1439b
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>
As in the past, to avoid rewriting various autotests that contain
line-number information, an extra blank line has been inserted at the
end of the license text to ensure that this commit does not change the
total number of lines in the license header.
Change-Id: I311e001373776812699d6efc045b5f742890c689
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
Change-Id: If805ea762047d07872a278956fc7637e5bafc6db
Reviewed-by: Robin Burchell <robin+qt@viroteck.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
Use the C++ boolean constants true and false instead of the C macros
TRUE and FALSE (which are actually integers), and use QVERIFY instead of
QCOMPARE for verifying simple boolean expressions.
Change-Id: Ie76dfcab6722df6b93b3fa62b0f3437901482932
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
These comments were mostly empty or inaccurate. Appropriate naming of
tests and appropriate placement of tests within the directory tree
provide more reliable indicators of what is being tested.
Change-Id: Ib6bf373d9e79917e4ab1417ee5c1264a2c2d7027
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
Currently there seems to be no precise definition of what
an integrationtest is in the context of Qt testing.
To avoid confusion, the tests under integrationtests/ are
moved into other/ (which is effectively where we keep
tests that don't clearly fit into any other category).
Tests can be moved back into an integrationtests/ directory
at a later point, should an unambiguous definition be established.
Change-Id: I3bb289be2dc2aca11b51a8ce8fcc5942f06d6c5c
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
