If you're on a Unix platform which don't have the necessary defines then
the thread will never be launched due to an error. Skip the test
instead.
Change-Id: I83159988b8f330a750c7aa328a8805e4fa478070
Reviewed-by: Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt <eskil.abrahamsen-blomfeldt@qt.io>
This test makes sure that we do not introduce a regression where the
threads exited the inner loop over the queue before the queue was
empty. This was triggered by calling tryTake at least maxThreadCount
times, which left the same number of null pointers in the queue
and caused the inner loop to exit too soon for all the threads.
Change-Id: I3a9d800149b88d09510ddc424667670b60f06a33
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
When many runnables are executed, this improves the
performance by not resizing the queue for each runnable,
which was the case in the previous version, because of
many calls to QVector::takeFirst().
Also add a test that makes sure tryTake() is safe to
call and does not leave the queue in a bad state that
tries to use nullptr entries.
Change-Id: I608134ecfa9cfc03db4878dcbd6f9c1107e13e90
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Allows setting the stack size for the thread pool
worker threads. Implemented using QThread::stackSize.
Task-number: QTBUG-2568
Change-Id: Ic7f3981289290685195bbaee977a23e0c3c49bf0
Reviewed-by: Morten Johan Sørvig <morten.sorvig@qt.io>
The cancel() function added in 5b11e43e for Qt 5.5 suffers from a
number of problems:
First, if runnable->autoDelete() is true, then the function suffers
from the ABA problem (see documentation written for trytake()).
Second, if runnable->autoDelete() is false, due to cancel() throwing
away crucial information instead of returning it, the caller cannot
know whether the runnable was canceled (and thus has to be deleted),
wasn't found or is currently executing (and thus mustn't be deleted),
or has finished executing (and can be used to extract the result).
Deprecate this dangerous API and replace it with the much more useful
Private::stealRunnable(), promoted to public API and renamed to
tryTake() for consistency with the rest of Qt.
Described the various caveats in the function's documentation.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QThreadPool] The cancel() function suffers from
several subtle issues and has been replaced with a new tryTake()
function.
Change-Id: I93125935614087efa24b3e3969dd6718aeabaa4f
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
We keep the runnables from finishing by having them block
on a QSemaphore::acquire() call inside run().
If we fail a test that precedes the call to sem.release()
further into the test, the early return will cause the
thread pool to be destroyed, which will then attempt to
wait for the runnables to finished, which, in turn wait
for the semaphore to be released.
-> dead lock
Fix by introducing a RAII object to release the semaphore
with a sufficiently large number to unblock all runnables.
That number will in some situations be too large, but that
does not matter.
Change-Id: I1ec7e29b37bc36309e93e6e30708cc7db3c9579c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
In order to get reproducible runs of the test, we need to
wait in the main thread until all runnables have started
executing. Otherwise, what the cancel() loop below actually
does will vary from run to run.
Change-Id: Ib912b0943e7bbd55c9480ae6fd4011ba20ac457e
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Instead of allocating a statically-sized array on the heap,
use an automatic C array instead.
Replace some magic numbers with named constants.
Change-Id: I17d29a76a67c4a413453ac26a5dee8cd54a8a37d
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
Manipulating a simple int from multiple threads is a data race,
thus undefined behavior.
Fix by using QAtomicInt and atomic operations instead.
Change-Id: I5418bc260da57fe353a71b8e5c7c1c97adbe7597
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
I wrote a script to help find the files, but I reviewed the
contributions manually to be sure I wasn't claiming copyright for search
& replace, adding Q_DECL_NOTHROW or adding "We mean it" headers.
Change-Id: I7a9e11d7b64a4cc78e24ffff142b506368fc8842
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
From Qt 5.7 -> tools & applications are lisenced under GPL v3 with some
exceptions, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new GPL-EXCEPT header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under GPL 3 with exceptions)
Change-Id: I42a473ddc97101492a60b9287d90979d9eb35ae1
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
Replace hardcoded interval by QTRY_COMPARE() ensuring that all tasks have
finished, since otherwise QThreadPool::tryStart() fails in the next run.
Remove blacklisting for MSVC2012 since it is not compiler-specific.
Task-number: QTBUG-49654
Change-Id: If49b6eb9ef4da4ba2911839166c397d84c175e00
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@theqtcompany.com>
The keyword no longer has a meaning for the new CI.
Change-Id: Ibcea4c7a82fb7f982cf4569fdff19f82066543d1
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@theqtcompany.com>
They didn't show up in the "old" CI runs because they usually pass the second
time they are executed - which the testrunner does. The new CI doesn't do that
anymore, instead we now mark those tests explicitly and will track their record
of passing and failing in the new metrics database.
Change-Id: Id34dd6f792f38995b07b6fec88f833df64de2f8b
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
Qt copyrights are now in The Qt Company, so we could update the source
code headers accordingly. In the same go we should also fix the links to
point to qt.io.
Outdated header.LGPL removed (use header.LGPL21 instead)
Old header.LGPL3 renamed to header.LGPL3-COMM to match actual licensing
combination. New header.LGPL-COMM taken in the use file which were
using old header.LGPL3 (src/plugins/platforms/android/extract.cpp)
Added new header.LGPL3 containing Commercial + LGPLv3 + GPLv2 license
combination
Change-Id: I6f49b819a8a20cc4f88b794a8f6726d975e8ffbe
Reviewed-by: Matti Paaso <matti.paaso@theqtcompany.com>
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QThreadPool] Added QThreadPool::cancel() which allows
removing from the job queue a job that hasn't been started yet.
Change-Id: Ib8f1c1f32a34f5eec8338c641d820b928e470164
Reviewed-by: Nick Shaforostoff <shafff@ukr.net>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Benign, but easy to avoid by using the same pattern as in clear().
Change-Id: Ie382313343385f0709519b232a7d58dd8181b8de
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
The combination of these unstable tests makes it very
hard to get changes through the CI system due to the
unrelated test failures.
Skip the following test functions:
tst_QIODevice::unget QTBUG-39983 (Mac)
tst_QThreadPool:expiryTimeoutRace QTBUG-3786 (Windows)
tst_QLocalSocket::processConnection QTBUG-39986 (Mac)
tst_QTcpServer::adressReusable QTBUG-39985 (Linux)
Change-Id: I96559bea0d437fd25966b6ccac1ece1490e06241
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@digia.com>
The tasks might not have run yet at the time of the QCOMPARE, so we need
to acquire on the semaphore in order to ensure that this is the case,
just like in the previous testcase.
Change-Id: I1da72bb07c2f53760b3bf912fc26aaf10ed18d48
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@digia.com>
The current synchronization mechanism was racy: decrementing waitingThreads
and then hoping that the wakeOne will wake a thread before its expiry
timeout happens. In other words, on timeout, a just-assigned task would
never run. And then no other task would run, if maxThreadCount is reached.
Fixed by using a queue of waiting threads (rather than just a count), and by
moving the wait condition into the thread itself, so we know precisely
which one we're waking up, and we can remove it from the set of waiting threads
before waking it up, and therefore it can determine on wakeup whether it
has work to do (caller removed it from the queue) or it expired (it's still
in the queue). This is reliable, whereas the return value from QWaitCondition::wait
isn't reliable, when the main thread has already decided that this thread
has work to do.
Task-number: QTBUG-3786
Change-Id: I1eac5d6c309daed7f483ac7a8074297bfda6ee32
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
(dacf9961da)
In order to see 2 active threads, we must check activeThreadCount() before
the runnable finishes.
Change-Id: I1a48b41e0c1fd81a65d915b9bd1e741ff267ed2b
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
QTBUG-21051 has a testcase where activeThreadCount() could actually
end up at -1 (converted to an autotest in this commit).
The reason was: start() calls tryStart() which returns false due to
too many active threads (reserveThread() causes this), so it calls
enqueueTask() - which actually wakes up the waiting thread, but
it didn't decrement the number of waiting threads.
Note that tryStart() is "if I can grab a waiting thread, enqueue task and wake it"
while start(), in case tryStart() fails, wants to "enqueue, and then if I can grab
a waiting thread, wake it". This is why enqueue shouldn't wake; waking must happen
only if we can grab a thread (d->waitingThreads > 0).
Task-number: QTBUG-21051
Change-Id: I3d98337103031c9bdf0bf365295f245be0c66aa7
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
QThreadPool::clear() method removes all queued QRunnable.
When a large number of long-running tasks are queud in a
QThreadPool its destruction, which calls waitForDone(), can
be quite long.
QThreadPool:clear() removes (and deletes when appropriate)
all QRunnable that have yet to be started from the queue
enabling a faster interruption.
Change-Id: Ie5d6028ad3cfe7e439d1db068c8d0936ff818db9
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
The optimisation done in cbaf52b099 for Qt
5.0 got the order wrong of the comparison. The queue must be sorted in
decreasing priority order. But since higher numbers mean higher
priority, that means the queue must be sorted in decreasing priority
number order.
Task-number: QTBUG-29163
Change-Id: Iaf3424b9bb445bf5c71518927f37253cead454f3
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Ritt <ritt.ks@gmail.com>
Remove all trailing whitespace from the following list of files:
*.cpp *.h *.conf *.qdoc *.pro *.pri *.mm *.rc *.pl *.qps *.xpm *.txt *README
excluding 3rdparty, test-data and auto generated code.
Note A): the only non 3rdparty c++-files that still
have trailing whitespace after this change are:
* src/corelib/codecs/cp949codetbl_p.h
* src/corelib/codecs/qjpunicode.cpp
* src/corelib/codecs/qbig5codec.cpp
* src/corelib/xml/qxmlstream_p.h
* src/tools/qdoc/qmlparser/qqmljsgrammar.cpp
* src/tools/uic/ui4.cpp
* tests/auto/other/qtokenautomaton/tokenizers/*
* tests/benchmarks/corelib/tools/qstring/data.cpp
* util/lexgen/tokenizer.cpp
Note B): in about 30 files some overlapping 'leading tab' and
'TAB character in non-leading whitespace' issues have been fixed
to make the sanity bot happy. Plus some general ws-fixes here
and there as asked for during review.
Change-Id: Ia713113c34d82442d6ce4d93d8b1cf545075d11d
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@digia.com>
Qt 4.8 shows frequent crashes in runMultiple apparently caused
by the QMutex construction in the free functions by different
threads. Use a common QMutex class member instead.
Change-Id: I851d4e2d3637a7b4f404ed843f5360c10caa21f5
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Change copyrights and license headers from Nokia to Digia
Change-Id: If1cc974286d29fd01ec6c19dd4719a67f4c3f00e
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergio Ahumada <sergio.ahumada@digia.com>
Qt 5.0 beta requires changing the default to the 5.0 API, disabling
the deprecated code. However, tests should test (and often do) the
compatibility API too, so turn it back on.
Task-number: QTBUG-25053
Change-Id: I8129c3ef3cb58541c95a32d083850d9e7f768927
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
