The verbose output for QCOMPARE is not very helpful. Make the verbose2
selftest (which reuses the counting selftest) demonstrate this, so that
a future commit can demonstrate improvement.
Change-Id: I6b3bc8f5199e984aa11d0a67b76a8c916be86380
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
Prior to this commit, the following statement in the qtestlib
documentation was untrue: "If init() fails, the following testfunction
will not be executed, the test will proceed to the next testfunction."
If init() called QSKIP, the test function would be skipped, but if
init() reported a failure, the test function would still be executed
(even though doing so could be unsafe).
This commit makes testlib skip a test function if init() reports a
failure and enhances the selftests to cover skips and fails in both
init() and cleanup().
Task-number: QTBUG-20371
Change-Id: Id1cc8464ae0b8c257ae1b74dbe9189a501f5366b
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
The test simply generates each possible pair of Pass, Fail and Skip
results. At present the test simply serves to demonstrate the current
shortcomings of testlib's plain text logging, namely:
* If a test function passes for all data rows, that is counted as one
pass, but each skipped or failed row counts as one skip or fail.
* Only skipped and failed rows are reported individually in the test
output. Passed rows are not reported, so it is impossible to see how
many rows were executed.
* A skip followed by a pass will be reported as an overall pass for the
test function, but the same rows in reverse order will not report any
overall result for the test function.
Future commits will attempt to correct these problems.
Task-number: QTBUG-22124
Change-Id: If8c7ea15fc43ba9a1bccd0e881c1efc18e705b25
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
