this is necessary for:
- generating -rpath-link arguments when link_prl is not used. link_prl
is enabled by default, so this has no effect on most projects.
- deployment purposes, which is hypothetical as of now.
Change-Id: I9e629f3eef93c4edf12efc016ecc27dbe2186d61
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
most module project files define two logical modules: a public one and
the corresponding private one. these are really separate modules as far
as qmake is concerned (even though the private one contains just
headers), and consequently have separate dependencies - QT and
QT_FOR_PRIVATE.
as public modules cannot depend on private ones, all private
dependencies would have to go to QT_FOR_PRIVATE, and a dependency on the
respective public module would have to be added to QT. this would be a
bit tedious, so we have a convenience feature which allows putting
private dependencies into QT, but automatically "downgrades" them to
their public counterpart when creating the public module's .pri file.
however, we failed to put verbatim versions of these private
dependencies into the private modules, which meant that these
dependencies were not pulled in transitively by the private modules'
users.
note that this entirely unrelated to QT_PRIVATE - this one defines the
private (non-propagated) dependencies of the module's implementation,
i.e., the libraries (and headers) that are not part of the link
interface. there is no QT_PRIVATE_FOR_PRIVATE, because there is
obviously no point in assigning the dependencies to a particular
logical submodule when neither one inherits them as far as the qt
module system is concerned.
Change-Id: Ib056b47dde3341ef9a52ffff13efaf8ef8e6817b
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
save the actual library/framework name and framework paths in the .pri
file instead of computing them again at use time in qt.prf.
qt_no_framework_direct_includes inherently requires a use-time decision,
so this ugliness remains.
Change-Id: I09b2775e7d8e1d52e3af0d663e1babde10ae4814
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@theqtcompany.com>
the main objective was to fix the bootstrap modules in framework builds.
bootstrapped modules which "borrow" headers from "proper" modules can
specify this in a clean way now.
a side effect of this is that the bootstrap-dbus module now has its own
syncqt call.
most includepath-related setup from qt_module_pris.prf was moved to
qt_module_headers.prf.
Change-Id: Ie0d8192cfac1a8cdae0ddd0bc0cd8c3092b1e85b
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@theqtcompany.com>
CONFIG+=qt_framework is actually put into qconfig.pri, so it's always
set in framework builds. things (sometimes) worked only by virtue of the
qt_framework checks being in "else" branches of "static" checks. use
lib_bundle instead, which triggers the actual framework build anyway.
amends b72d1db44.
Change-Id: Ib725c43476d9fb38bad940ce09905d29ff3edfa3
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@theqtcompany.com>
the rpath applies only to the installed on-device location and is
consequently always the same for all modules, so there is no point in
indirections.
Change-Id: Ia0590552aa317d799a2d3879fd0c0768344b9645
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
while every "real" module has private headers, a very small headers-only
module could reasonably have none. entirely hypothetically, of course. ;)
Change-Id: Ib51a66858fb7d62f45fe2928625c25aa1ffc2827
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
they have no library to link against, obviously.
Change-Id: I721670382c1ec56e19130f0a0ecef616e101b885
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
spaces in the source dir are not supported for now, as that requires
some more profound refactoring of the bootstrap makefiles.
Change-Id: Ie0c07a1558b8326f642f2ea144bc1cd85ee761af
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
these reflect the on-target paths (unlike /raw, which are host paths, just
without the -sysroot). this is necessary for anything deployment-related,
starting with RPATH.
Change-Id: I13d598995d0e4d6cb0dc1fc7938b8631cf3e3a95
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
Whenever a binary is created and linked against a static lib that was
compiled with LTCG, the final linking step requires the compiler flags
so that the pre-compiled data in the shared library can get properly
compiled.
This could happen for a static build of Qt with LTCG, but also happens
frequently for Qt's own build when linking regular libraries and
applications against QtBootstrap or QtPlatformSupport. The linking fails
when the target is a shared library (example: QtWaylandClient linking
against QtPlatformSupport).
The .prl file actually contains the "ltcg" flag, so the best solution
would actually be to process that flag there and add link_ltcg if any
dependent .prl has "ltcg", but I couldn't find out how to do that.
Change-Id: I4a75a14d1dcb8c2089a427285e25d5555df7d7d3
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@theqtcompany.com>
when a module delegates to another module (as the activeqt ones do), it
doesn't have a master header to be included. we could derive the real
master header by doing a transitive dependency resolution and some
filtering, but that seems unnecessarily complex.
Task-number: QTBUG-41892
Change-Id: Ie7ce51a837ac06e929b204ec734206c11b3ae241
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@theqtcompany.com>
when doing a module-by-module build, we need to also use includes and
libraries from the install tree, as it contains the current module's
dependencies. but a pre-existing installation of the current module must
not be found first, as it would cause trouble latest when it was somehow
incompatible.
but purely topological sorting of the dependencies could cause the
locations to be mixed up. therefore we give modules which are part of
the current build a priority boost.
Change-Id: I8fdbb46f0a2a630781c8a2177468039c1122151a
Reviewed-by: Giulio Camuffo <giulio.camuffo@jollamobile.com>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
the plugins already declare which modules they belong to.
additionally, we allow plugins to declare which modules they "extend" -
e.g., while the Quick accessibility plugin belongs to Gui's 'accessiblity'
type, it makes no sense to link it unless Quick is actually linked.
finally, it is possible to manually override the plugins which are linked
for a particular type, by setting QTPLUGIN.<type> (to '-' if no plugins
of this type should be linked at all).
Task-number: QTBUG-35195
Change-Id: I8273d167a046eb3f3c1c584dc6e3798212a2fa31
Reviewed-by: Fawzi Mohamed <fawzi.mohamed@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
the module project files declare what plugins they need, as that is
necessary for automatic android deployment.
enable wider usage of this by making the information available from the
module .pri files.
caveat: the variable is called "types", but is in fact paths, so there
can be particular plugins named.
use this new facility to replace the egregious hard-coded list of
plugin-to-module mappings from create_cmake.
possible todo: automate populating DEPLOYMENT (for wince, and whatever
else).
Change-Id: Ibb9c07cfe2b0008905204cbeb81e9c8e2ae4dc69
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
instead of being magic attributes of the main modules, the privates
are now proper modules of their own.
this cleans up some code paths, is more mappable to other build tools,
and enables private modules to depend on other private modules.
note that the library path is needed even in the "empty" private
modules, as in the framework case that's where headers are found.
consequently, the modules need to be explicitly marked with the new
"no_link" flag. this required some reorganization of qtAddModule().
Change-Id: I8e4f44a609f8d639cc01bcb658256870a627eb63
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
the previous attempt broke ActiveQt, as it actually has public modules
without headers (they are provided by a common base module).
so explicitly mark the internal modules as such instead of applying
heuristics.
Change-Id: I8d8a2ee66f02c3444da2036a497e7f382f089f62
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
make the include dir in the source tree the "main" include path, as
that's where the majority of the headers is. then selectively add the
shadowed dirs.
Change-Id: I03ad13cfcf77175c141b94d41b1221740d851faf
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
all private headers are created by syncqt (and are thus in the source
dir), so we can simply override the normal (build dir based) paths
instead of extending them.
Change-Id: I9c1f3344c401b481b3f3d2295515f1aabffaa9a0
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
these builds usually assume all headers in the qtbase build (== source
== install) dir, so the path for adding our pre-generated per-module
include paths needs to be triggered explicitly.
Change-Id: I57ec441d58cdf8186907ee6c36dce08daa206c49
Reviewed-by: Kai Koehne <kai.koehne@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
the logic in the configures was even trying to express that, only that
nowadays we always ship syncqt, so the tests were kinda pointless.
this frees us from the perl dependency for non-developer builds of
packaged modules (except for webkit, which needs almost every scripting
language on earth anyway).
obviously, this requires that the packaging scripts run syncqt in the
source dir before tarring up the sources. note that for repositories
other than qtbase, the -version argument needs to be passed to syncqt.
Task-number: QTBUG-29465
Change-Id: Ic929ab17a5de4b30fbf48b3aa9bfa3b4d2ef37d6
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
it would only cause trouble further down the line.
Change-Id: Ied9ba8a1ecf36b77e1091c73564bd7601ea6a6b4
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
... and introduce -hostlibdir configure option for symmetry.
the libraries built for the host have no business in the target prefix.
in principle this code would even support dynamically linked host
libraries, but that's currently unused.
Task-number: QTBUG-30591
Change-Id: I8e600fa4911a020fb0e87fbf7ef2f35647c7c4d5
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Romanov <drizt@land.ru>
QT_CONFIG is supposed to contain configure output, not a list of
modules. for example, enumerating modules is not cleanly possible if
modules are mixed with other flags.
the conflation was merely historical, due to webkit and phonon doing
it this way in the preliminary qt4 modularization.
we now have a much cleaner way to query modules (qtHaveModule(<module>),
or less recently, !isEmpty(QT.<module>.name)), which is already used
throughout Qt.
the old way was supposed to be removed for 5.0 already, but it slipped.
better do it now, before people actually start using it.
Change-Id: Iabdf0cdfaab9cd674f634f4c6ece105b2039c850
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
modules which demand it (i.e., qtwebkit) need forwarding pris, etc.,
even when not making a -prefix build.
Change-Id: Id405be8763e94cc074854f799bd785e9cdf62e8e
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Andras Becsi <andras.becsi@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com>
if the libraries are in a non-standard location, but no rpath is used,
rpath-link is needed. this is often the case for non-prefix builds
(which have no forwarding pris any more).
as we cannot store absolute paths in the final pris, we need to store the
module names, and resolve them only at use time.
Change-Id: I1538b5d531611c76a2d7058a3b2ff683bdcbe427
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
as everything is built inside the common build/install dir, there is
no point in the fwd pri stuff.
as a "side effect", this makes it more straight-forward to relocate
non-prefix builds, which is the default on windows.
Task-number: QTBUG-28827
Change-Id: I010246a9ad87cf74974dc168768b1a8625f73260
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
move the regular pri file creation into the "sub-prf" and rename it
accordingly. the original reason for the split was the deep magic in
activeqt (and phonon), which is gone now.
Change-Id: If40e941afc9293725630ed6bcf3e4ef18a692f66
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
