Makes it clearer what members depend on arguments to the ctor. And
what the initial value of all the members are.
Change-Id: Ie1cd2361955053eaf4c4e6887d23ac245738288d
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mate Barany <mate.barany@qt.io>
We have code in the protocolHandlers that tries to handle this case, but
if we have an error before we create protocolHandler (read: proxy
complains about something) we will assert in debug, or
deref nullptr in release.
Pick-to: 6.6 6.5 6.2
Change-Id: I4bde9c8af0fa96dc11f77ca4d4b5cb84c31b54fa
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
Build system adds this flag to any module that it uses when built as a
shared library and not WASM.
VxWorks is specific in regards to type of applications:
- static application, which do not use any dynamic libraries
- dynamic application, which uses shared libraries, and as such needs
to link against libdl.a
The latter is the only source of symbols related to dynamic loading and
thread local storage. This is an architectural decision, as application
is required to embed loading tools in itself (as opposed to Unix/Linux,
which contains dynamic loader which provides these symbols separately).
libdl.a is standard static library on VxWorks, compiled without PIC, and
as such can't be linked into shared library.
This results in compilation errors when building dynamic libraries which
use `thread_local`-related symbols, since these symbols will be
fulfilled at runtime (contained in executable which requires shared lib)
and are not available during linking.
Don't add `-Wl,--no-undefined` flag on VxWorks for Qt shared lib builds.
Task-number: QTBUG-115777
Change-Id: I47e5d68afcba2c3b4203e4c0beded2e18ea2563b
Reviewed-by: Pasi Petäjäjärvi <pasi.petajajarvi@qt.io>
These source files have been ported away from Q_FOREACH but weren't
blacklisted, so un-blacklist them by removing "#undef QT_NO_FOREACH",
and removing them from NO_PCH_SOURCES.
These are the last remnants of the Q_FOREACH blacklisting in QtWidgets.
Task-number: QTBUG-115803
Change-Id: Ib73d668687f64d39fa48397d75a0f342e525c1ad
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
These two QSetS are local to the function, the loop bodies don't modify
them but they can't be made const due to the way they're filled. So use
std::as_const and ranged-for.
Un-blacklist the file, by removing "#undef QT_NO_FOREACH", and removing
the source file from NO_PCH_SOURCES.
Change-Id: I49b852aa865b0321d3e2f617466557d77143a32b
Task-number: QTBUG-115803
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
getGestureTargets() first parameter is a QSet created locally at the
call site in deliverEvents(); and the loop body doesn't change it.
Change-Id: I3484f7ecc9d85b22b45a123ccf75316d5316e031
Task-number: QTBUG-115803
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Those QSetS are local to the function, make them const, proving that the
loop bodies didn't change them, and the copy Q_FOREACH took wasn't
needed.
Task-number: QTBUG-115803
Change-Id: Iec2fc31fc060c59760a84dc45baf8fa16f62eb6d
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
The "conflictedGestures" QHash is local to the function, and the code in
the loop body doesn't change it. The "gestures" QList (the value in the
QHash key/value pair) isn't changed in the loop (both the enclosing
for-loop and the for-loop iterating over the QList itself):
- the QGestureEvent constructor takes by const& so it couldn't have
changed the QList
So use a const QList& instead of a copy.
Task-number: QTBUG-115803
Change-Id: I4d7f2f833fe0119b9c1ffa91b0cdba9561025382
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
The enclosing iterator-based loop: the loop body doesn't modify the
`m_objectGestures` QMap (the original loop was using const_iterators),
so port to ranged-for by using asKeyValueRange().
The foreach loop: the loop body doesn't modify the `gestures` QList, so
a simple port to ranged-for.
Task-number: QTBUG-115803
Change-Id: I92ba7ff6ef878d7e4b7115a8fab87e95a6d93182
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
The loop doesn't modify the QHash while iterating over it, so use
std::as_const.
Drive by change: Use asKeyValueRange() to get a key/value pair:
- No need to allocate a QStringList to hold the keys
- Prevent double lookup which happened when hash.value(key) was used
inside the loop body
Task-number: QTBUG-115803
Change-Id: Ic0473c0971089f6ca75d3397209fe1c909e975a1
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
The loop body doesn't change the QHash, so use asKeyValueRange() and
ranged-for.
Un-blacklist the file, by removing "#undef QT_NO_FOREACH", and removing
the source file from NO_PCH_SOURCES.
Task-number: QTBUG-115803
Change-Id: I22924d2addeed75867edf9f6cac53f1c6f266dcc
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
It was weird that they were missing. Now that C++23 added them to
std::span, add them to QSpan, too.
Pick-to: 6.6
Change-Id: I4a9b1fdeda66bc7b133c8f7b3b269656e5faffa3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Overload the binary QSet operators |, &, + and - for rvalue LHSs, so
chained operations like e.g. in qgesturemanager.cpp:
QSet<QGesture *> endedGestures =
finishedGestures + canceledGestures + undeliveredGestures + maybeToCanceledGestures;
become as efficient as chained op+= calls.
Make the operators hidden friends as a drive-by.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QSet] The binary operators &, |, + and - are now
hidden friends, and chaining them has been made a lot more efficient.
Change-Id: I55d2247b11d088eb1ef88608f89d2bf9e1daeb58
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
All these TUs relied on transitive includes of qpointer.h, maybe to a
large extent via qevent.h, though, given that qevent.h is more or less
the only public QtBase header that includes qpointer.h, something else
seems to be at play here.
Said qevent.h actually needs QPointer in-name-only, so a forward
declaration would suffice. Prepare for qevent.h dropping the include.
The algorithm I used was:
If the TU mentions 'passiveGrabbers', the name of the QEvent function
that returns QPointers, and the TU doesn't have qpointer.h included
explicitly, include it. That may produce False Positives, but better
safe than sorry. Otherwise, in src/, add an include to all source and
header files which mention QPointer. Exception: if foo.h of a foo.cpp
already includes it, don't include again.
Task-number: QTBUG-117670
Change-Id: I3321cccdb41ce0ba6d8a709cea92427aba398254
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Follow-up patch for 39d486171b - don't
create a temporary container for the connections but add them directly
into the final one.
Task-number: QTBUG-117698
Change-Id: I6ea3b1a5a834f2581f3929cca13c53f47b8c9805
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
When QDoc reads an `\fn` command it saves it to a file to parse it with
Clang, with the objective of using the produced AST to perform certain
sanity checks on the documented element.
Generally, `\fn` commands that do not represent correct C++ code are
accepted as long as Clang is still able to build an AST Node that QDoc
can work with, not resulting in any issue in the output documentation.
For example, an `\fn` that doesn't state a return type might be able to
be parsed correctly enough by Clang to produce a sensible Node for the
function that QDoc is interested into.
The documentation for `QPromise::emplaceResult/emplaceResultAt` make
use of this possibility by not stating a return type.
Up to Clang 15 this was not an issue, and a correct-enough AST was
produced when the `\fn` commands for those methods were parsed.
On Clang 16, Clang chokes on the missing return type, being unable to
recognize the function definition and produce an AST that QDoc can work
with.
This has the effect of losing those documented element in the output
documentation.
To avoid the issue, a return type is now added to the relevant `\fn`
commands.
Task-number: QTBUG-111580
Change-Id: I7d41fc52720ff8762bf2cce229969b7250e44754
Reviewed-by: Paul Wicking <paul.wicking@qt.io>
This changes takes Qt for Android Java code away from the Delegate
classes that uses heavily Java reflection to invoke Activity/Service
calls and overrides. So instead of that, now, we have a QtActivityBase
and a QtServiceBase classes which handle the override logic needed for
Qt directly without reflection.
These Base classes extend Android's Activity and Service directly, and
are inside the internal Qt android package (under Qt6Android.jar).
For example, to handle onConfigurationChanged, instead of the current
way where we need this in QtActivityDelegate:
public void onConfigurationChanged(Configuration configuration)
{
try {
m_super_onConfigurationChanged.invoke(m_activity, configuration);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
handleUiModeChange(configuration.uiMode &
Configuration.UI_MODE_NIGHT_MASK);
}
And then this in QtActivity:
@Override
public void onConfigurationChanged(Configuration newConfig)
{
if (!QtLoader.invokeDelegate(newConfig).invoked)
super.onConfigurationChanged(newConfig);
}
public void super_onConfigurationChanged(Configuration newConfig)
{
super.onConfigurationChanged(newConfig);
}
And having to keep it's Method handles around and then use Java
reflection
to call the override behavior done by Qt and the superclass methods.
instead of that, we can do it now in QtActivityBase like:
@Override
public void onConfigurationChanged(Configuration newConfig)
{
super.onConfigurationChanged(newConfig);
handleUiModeChange(newConfig.uiMode &
Configuration.UI_MODE_NIGHT_MASK);
}
Then, we would still have our user facing QtActivity class which extends
QtActivityBase and benefit from the same implementation of Qt logic done
in the base class.
An additional benefit to this approach is that now QtActivity will be
very lightweight and doesn't need to have all the boilerplate code as
before.
[ChangeLog][Android] Simplify Qt for Android public bindings
(QActivity, QtService and QtApplication) by implementing base
classes which use the delegate implementions directly and avoid
reflection.
Task-number: QTBUG-115014
Task-number: QTBUG-114593
Change-Id: Ie1eca74f989627be4468786a27e30b16209fc521
Reviewed-by: Tinja Paavoseppä <tinja.paavoseppa@qt.io>
The m_activityObject and m_serviceObjects are no longer plain
jobjects. Instead they are constructed with a jobject.
The constructor makes it a global ref, which the destructor
then frees. The destruction happens when the stdlib exit()
is called.
However, since the terminateQt() function already had released the
global ref, the destruction of the objects crashes the
application with a JNI APPLICATION ERROR in Android logs.
In addition since the the code only ever freed the reference to
a reference, the actual reference was leaked.
Change-Id: I6bb637dba2de59e89436685a9d63950d36438fa5
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
Various constant keys were duplicated in QtActivityDelegate,
QtServiceDelegate and QtLoader classes, and this de-duplicates that.
Task-number: QTBUG-115014
Task-number: QTBUG-114593
Change-Id: I3479fbb58293b26b7625f8653289c6b6d987a59f
Reviewed-by: Tinja Paavoseppä <tinja.paavoseppa@qt.io>
Following the previous change in the chain, this removes override calls
that have no implementation under Qt Delegates, so they can be removed
and
the default behavior would persist.
Task-number: QTBUG-115014
Task-number: QTBUG-114593
Change-Id: Ia7c76e9b56c63cba935cb3d2ae3b6260d3462e51
Reviewed-by: Tinja Paavoseppä <tinja.paavoseppa@qt.io>
Those overrides are deprecated and will print a warning during Gradle
build, moreover, these calls don't have any implementation by Qt that's
being triggered by the Qt Delegates classes, so they don't need to be
kept in the Activity/Service main classes' implementations.
Task-number: QTBUG-115014
Task-number: QTBUG-114593
Change-Id: If0c241206652c1a52e2396a24ec7ab63236e6308
Reviewed-by: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Tinja Paavoseppä <tinja.paavoseppa@qt.io>
These forward calls to QtNative don't need to be present inside the
QtActivity implementation, all those calls are invoked by the Delegate
classes.
Task-number: QTBUG-115014
Task-number: QTBUG-114593
Change-Id: Id1bfa694687af3edc4e9b82b09cf13e1f8eba1de
Reviewed-by: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Tinja Paavoseppä <tinja.paavoseppa@qt.io>
Move QtLoader classes outside of the bindings package and into
the internal Android Java package (Qt6Android.jar that is), to simplify
Qt for Android project templates. This is because QtLoader classes are
used to trigger Qt libs loading and the users don't need to necessarily
know about it or find it in the project's source files.
The classes in question: QtLoader, QtActivityLoader, and
QtServiceLoader.
Task-number: QTBUG-115014
Task-number: QTBUG-114593
Change-Id: I61f68abf6ee83fc45bc47ed9af7457db4f7deabc
Reviewed-by: Tinja Paavoseppä <tinja.paavoseppa@qt.io>
When building non-qtbase tqtc repos in CI, we don't load a lot of
Plugin Config files in static builds due to project names having a
tqtc- prefix. This is similar to the issue and workaround that was
done in 4c6292686259e4e232f29cb6fd6c79065e9fa96d for qtserialport.
The specific issue here is the following error:
CMake Error at Qt6Gui/Qt6GuiTargets.cmake:61 (set_target_properties):
The link interface of target "Qt6::Gui" contains:
IntegrityPlatformGraphics::IntegrityPlatformGraphics
but the target was not found. Possible reasons include:
* There is a typo in the target name.
* A find_package call is missing for an IMPORTED target.
* An ALIAS target is missing.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
/home/qt/work/install/target/lib/cmake/Qt6Gui/Qt6GuiConfig.cmake:52
(include)
/home/qt/work/install/target/lib/cmake/Qt6/Qt6Config.cmake:157
(find_package)
CMakeLists.txt:15 (find_package)
To work around the issue, explicitly record a dependency on the
IntegrityPlatformGraphics target for Gui when building on INTEGRITY.
The underlying issue is sadly still not fixed.
Change-Id: I9a9cff05d036f224aab8083ad6bc8b8e568abd8b
Pick-to: 6.6
Task-number: QTBUG-102883
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Tatiana Borisova <tatiana.borisova@qt.io>
We need access to bitPosition in order to check if a role was set.
This fixes the following build error:
[...] qwindowstheme.cpp(1150): error C2220: the following warning is treated as an error
[...] qwindowstheme.cpp(1150): warning C4506: no definition for inline function 'QPalette::ResolveMask QPalettePrivate::bitPosition(QPalette::ColorGroup,QPalette::ColorRole)'
Amends 417878904b.
Task-number: QTBUG-116826
Change-Id: I815c7e961198ab93b6ed6132badc2ec693522472
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Eftevaag <oliver.eftevaag@qt.io>
Check if QCoreApplication::instance() and print a warning if not instead
creating and assertion later on.
Fixes: QTBUG-117621
Change-Id: Iffb4f7097edbbaf19cb584bff6e5ba1535bf88a0
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
It's not needed, and might trigger -Wshadow on some compilers. Only
the public QSpan class has the `extent` static data member, everything
else uses the template argument, `E`, directly.
Amends f82cf6333e.
Pick-to: 6.6
Change-Id: If378119aff1e352d1e90854b570720444cd532a0
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dennis Oberst <dennis.oberst@qt.io>
The previous ones no longer lead to the
corresponding documentation.
Pick-to: 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I3f56ad71fa3f936898a25f20f718c7f65a0385a2
Reviewed-by: Liang Qi <liang.qi@qt.io>
Use QSV more to avoid manual memcpy
Also port loop to range-based for
Change-Id: I06f4b424853a4b3ee245c66ccc650d87740e2cb8
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
QFuture::then() uses QtPrivate::Continuation::create(), which in turn
uses private API from an inline function:
f->d.setContinuation(ContinuationWrapper(std::move(continuation)), fi.d);
f->d is QFutureInterfaceBase (a public class), but its setContinuation()
takes QFutureInterfaceBasePrivate by pointer. Our ELF versioning scripts
mark everything that uses that class as private, resulting in:
4806: 0000000000287d70 365 FUNC GLOBAL PROTECTED 16 _ZN20QFutureInterfaceBase15setContinuationESt8functionIFvRKS_EEP27QFutureInterfaceBasePrivate@@Qt_6_PRIVATE_API
This commit adds an exception for this symbol, causing it to go back to
the regular "Qt_6" ELF version:
5629: 00000000003d6a16 366 FUNC GLOBAL PROTECTED 16 _ZN20QFutureInterfaceBase15setContinuationESt8functionIFvRKS_EEP27QFutureInterfaceBasePrivate@@Qt_6
This solution can probably be cleaned up a bit by moving the marker into
the header files parsed by syncqt, so they follow code motion without
having to remember to update the CMakeLists.txt. That requires some
surgery with syncqt, so not suitable for cherry-picking.
As a drive-by, fix the target_type check
for the _qt_extra_linker_script_content genex property
Fixes: QTBUG-117514
Pick-to: 6.6
Change-Id: I85599ea5ca7a4b79a8bbfffd178b92e73dbe11de
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
The loops are iterating over local const containers, so use ranged-for.
Remove '#undef QT_NO_FOREACH'.
Task-number: QTBUG-115839
Change-Id: I252f048e3c469bf9bb34cb0756ccbd57571fd886
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
GestureWidget::ignoredGestures QSet:
- elements are inserted in the container in a top-level test function,
then a CustomEvent is constructed and sendCustomGesture() is called,
which sends the events, invoking the GestureWidget::event() overload,
the latter iterates over the container, thus the container isn't
changed while it's being iterated over, because the code can't recurse
into the top-level test function and that's where the container is
modified later on (by inserting or by calling widget.reset() which
clears the container)
- the loop body doesn't change the container
So use ranged-for and std::as_const.
The same logic applies to the GestureItem::ignoredGestures QSet.
Task-number: QTBUG-115839
Change-Id: Icf95e90a8af5aa7e947035704121557494afc326
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
It noted that an unspecified function claimed the offset it was
checking should be +1, while testing it against that or -1. The
function turns out to be QDateTime::addDays(), whose doc did indeed,
misleadingly, say that it lands after a gap it would have hit. It in
fact overshoots the gap in the direction of its change. Amend its
docs, likewise those of addMonths() and addYears(), to reflect the
true behavior.
Amend the test to look at the direction of the step its taking and
anticipate that the adjustment will be in the same direction; then
compare the actual adjustment to that.
Change-Id: I9ab918fac0ab2195ef014983f37fccc435bf0498
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
The implementation previously worked for non-short date-times, where
the offset has been remembered since construction. This included the
case of zoned times (and local times more than 2^55 msec away from the
start of 1970) that hit a spring-forward's gap; but excluded local
times that did the same (within 2^55 msec of the epoch).
This precluded an offset check in a spring-forward test, now added.
We can in fact determine the offset whenever we got a valid date and
time (we do so in the course of initializing the object, and when
asked for toMSecsSinceEpoch(), even when invalid), and we should not
use the value of the recorded offset if we didn't get a valid date and
time, so amend to always return 0 if we didn't get valid date and time
and always report the correct offset otherwise.
In the process, amend offsetFromUtc()'s computation to directly
resolve the date-time, rather than doing so via toMSecsSinceEpoch(),
which has to repeat decision-making offsetFromUtc() has already done
by the time it calls it. Also amend toMSecsSinceEpoch() to return 0 if
we didn't have a valid date and time to begin with, so it only
attempts to produce a useful result in the case where construction
attempted to resolve the date-time.
Change-Id: I6574e362275ccc4fbd8de6f0fa875d2e50f3bffe
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
The resolution selects a point in time outside the gap, which will be
represented by toMSecsSinceEpoch()'s return, despite the QDT object's
isValid() returning false. Previously we retained the
originally-calculated msecs, so as to keep date() and time() matching
what was asked for. However, this required adjusting offset, which was
not remembered for local times within 2^55 milliseconds of the start
of 1970. This lead to an inconsistency between the offset from UTC
reported for the resolution for a local time further from the epoch,
or for a time-zone, and the actual offset from UTC at the time
indicated by the return from toMSecsSinceEpoch().
Instead, retain the actually calculated offset (even if we aren't
going to remember it) and adjust the msecs to the value that ensures
toMSecsSinceEpoch() will get the selected resolution. This
incidentally means that, when toMSecsSinceEpoch() has to re-resolve
(for a local time within 2^55 msecs of the epoch), it avoids
revisiting the complications of hitting the gap.
In passing, change internal stateAtMillis() to take the QTimeZone it
is passed by const reference, to save a copy (noticed during debug).
Also tweak a comment in a test to be explicit about a default value.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][Possibly Significant Behavior Change] When
QDateTime is instantiated for a combination of date and time that was
skipped, by local time or a time-zone, for example during a
spring-forward DST transition, the invalid result's time() - and, in
rare cases, date() - no longer match what was asked for. Instead,
these values and offsetFromUtc() now match the point in time
identified by toMSecsSinceEpoch().
Change-Id: Id61c4274b365750f56442a4a598be5c14cfca689
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Pass the pointer to the QWidget the icon is painted on to
QStyle::standardIcon/Pixmap().
Change-Id: If9dbc3acb621fb60152f2e12fc0080f354397a99
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
The slider handle has a small bug not painting the underlying rectangle
with the correct direction which lead to a small visual glitch only
visible with a high-dpi screen.
Change-Id: Ie75e034b85542228ed7a8372dc7b9a419731630d
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
In gtk3 theme, the inactive color group had been set with incorrect
palette or not been set for some cases, which leads to glitch when
moving application window. This is because inactive group palettes were
applied during window movement and its expected to be set with correct
palettes.
This patch fixes this issue by setting correct palette for inactive
color group.
Fixes: QTBUG-112879
Pick-to: 6.6 6.5
Change-Id: I6658843626f322fee0ef99dfafb550956e3e0aee
Reviewed-by: Jonas Karlsson <jonas.karlsson@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Axel Spoerl <axel.spoerl@qt.io>
clang-format and the optimized SIGNAL/SLOT notation are not
good friends.
Change-Id: Id07936b4654e567b59af5a8b1d7baad000484931
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mate Barany <mate.barany@qt.io>
If a QShortcut is registered with a QWindow as its parent, but QApplication
is used, we end up in QApplicationPrivate::createShortcutPrivate(), and
create a QtWidgetsShortcutPrivate that implements shortcut context matching
via qWidgetShortcutContextMatcher.
The problem is that qWidgetShortcutContextMatcher expects the windows
to be QWidgetWindows, which meant that plain QWindow based shortcuts
would always fail.
This can happen for example if a QApplication is used in Qt Quick
to provide dialog fallbacks, but QShortcuts are otherwise used
with plain QWindows, or QQuickWindows e.g.
We now defer the check of whether there's an active (widget) window,
and fall back to QtGui's simpleContextMatcher in case we don't find
a QWidget, QAction, or QGraphicsWidget shortcut owner to handle
the matching for.
Note: We don't support shortcut matching for QAction in QtGui,
but this is left for another day. There is also a discrepancy
between how QtGui and QtWidgets handles Qt::ApplicationShortcut.
The former will treat it as a match even if there is no active
QWindow, while the latter requires that there's an active widget
window.
Fixes: QTBUG-116221
Change-Id: I487995f2e660a40f6556828b84a521d81a58f1b6
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
Amends 39294317e0, after which class names have to be slash-separated.
Change-Id: I5b8415b711f4deed9b6134eccd3232f299b1ef4d
Reviewed-by: Assam Boudjelthia <assam.boudjelthia@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Juha Vuolle <juha.vuolle@qt.io>
A little code simplification. And we can enable exception handling
explicitly for GCC/Clang by adding "-fexceptions", it was missing
in the old code, add it as well.
[ChangeLog] [Build System] Qt explicitly pass -fexceptions now on
non-MSVC toolchains, if exception handling is not disabled in CMake
configure.
Change-Id: Id9d61d3ee8b7d490f4a743e34e8be321af080be0
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Q_GUI_EXPORT the private header to access it from outside Gui.
Task-number: QTBUG-116826
Pick-to: 6.6
Change-Id: I6aaabe2df7ebebd7b53662f47a52c748344067bc
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
Amends ef9fe7a99a and fixes some rare
cases where the macro argument wasn't a single token, such as what was
found in PySide code:
qCDebug(*category, "%s", %2);
Fixes: QTBUG-117153
Pick-to: 6.5 6.6
Change-Id: I85599ea5ca7a4b79a8bbfffd178a51023648f244
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Amends da95ad91b3. Caught by CodeChecker:
std::move of the const expression has no effect; remove std::move()
I'll instead remove the const.
Pick-to: 6.6
Change-Id: I8f3ce163ccc5408cac39fffd178ccec9fcc38e9c
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Samir <a.samirh78@gmail.com>
The documentation above says it's intentionally not const and that's how
I had designed it. It was added by accident on with the noexcept
qualifier on commit c129362b4d ("Add a
couple of noexcept").
Change-Id: I8f3ce163ccc5408cac39fffd178c7fd237c6e079
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@qt.io>
Testing for Standard Library features with compiler version macros was
incorrect. This commit fixes that to check the correct macros. That
fixes the use of Clang-cl / ICX because Microsoft STL doesn't have
support for 128-bit integers (because Microsoft's compiler doesn't) but
Clang does.
Amends 104a0a9ecd.
Fixes: QTBUG-117870
Pick-to: 6.6
Change-Id: I85599ea5ca7a4b79a8bbfffd178b9688e7c1bf42
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
