Before commit 4d15f393a7 update requests
were handled by a timer on QWindow. Therefore they survived the closing
and re-opening of platform windows. Now, as the timer was moved to
QPlatformWindow, it gets reset when you close the QWindow, and any
pending update requests are lost. However, we do set the
updateRequestPending variable on QWindow when requesting an update.
Therefore, we can also restore the update timer on the platform window
when creating it.
Change-Id: I23b00f24a46706beac7d1455edd8a5623db46b22
Fixes: QTBUG-70957
Reviewed-by: Tim Jenssen <tim.jenssen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hartmann <thomas.hartmann@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Agocs <laszlo.agocs@qt.io>
In openSUSE 15.0 /etc/os-release the ID of the OS was
changed from "opensuse" to "opensuse-leap". So every blacklisting
we did for opensuse, didn't cover opensuse-leap. This one adds
opensuse-leap as a blacklisted platform whenever opensuse
was blacklisted.
Task-number: QTBUG-70463
Task-number: QTBUG-51399
Change-Id: I5879eb34926757163973d8b9442eae58f47d2f11
Reviewed-by: Liang Qi <liang.qi@qt.io>
Additionally to setting the cursor position we have to make sure that
enter and leave events are triggered. As WinRT at the moment only supports
maximized/fullscreen native top level widgets, an enter or leave event has
to be triggered, every time the cursor enters or leaves the core window.
Same as is done on Windows desktop an enter event is immediately followed
by a move event even for emulated mouse events.
Change-Id: I4b9a7b07f8e24b7887619f96979a064d933788aa
Reviewed-by: Maurice Kalinowski <maurice.kalinowski@qt.io>
The test doesn't make much sense on platforms that don't support window
activation.
Task-number: QTBUG-66849
Change-Id: I875314d026d666173ec345d0864ad41d66179783
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
The test is actually passing, so just enable it.
Task-number: QTBUG-66849
Change-Id: Ie1566b9e5e19f5ab6d919624aa14662a1d4483ec
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Link to a bug report so we can track the failures and figure out how to fix
it in Qt Wayland or if we should skip the tests in a proper way. I.e. with
platform capabilities or similar.
Task-number: QTBUG-66849
Change-Id: I7a16333c7d2284eb9da6efd4515891438e9976b3
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
As setting cursor position is not allowed on Wayland.
Task-number: QTBUG-66824
Change-Id: I1f065b7072dff13b1ee8a4fc3ccec347e8d71ed1
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Pier Luigi Fiorini <pierluigi.fiorini@liri.io>
This reverts commit fdddb3a481.
After b85b272c26810e54a4ceb0707cf4569f87517b67, Windows 10
(msvc2017-x86) is tested on Windows 10 (msvc2017-x86_64). The
failure is gone.
Task-number: QTBUG-66798
Task-number: QTBUG-66216
Change-Id: Iba353b18b0be1346007fde674a9f768c4b9bf384
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
This reverts commit a0db55040d.
After b85b272c26810e54a4ceb0707cf4569f87517b67, Windows 10
(msvc2017-x86) is tested on Windows 10 (msvc2017-x86_64). The
failure is gone.
Task-number: QTBUG-66756
Change-Id: I4a8e8c62b4a021d144d570c38c4f4c10e8b1317c
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Before running tests that depend on QWindow::requestActivate
Gets rid of several Wayland platform checks in tst_QWindow.
Change-Id: I7a5e029044a968dfcf87ecbb5105c01d52852d35
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Pier Luigi Fiorini <pierluigi.fiorini@liri.io>
And make it easier to fix if platformName == wayland-egl etc.
Change-Id: Ia2d62ba003796e08f3e8a5bbfd0c3fd9d185e4e0
Reviewed-by: Pier Luigi Fiorini <pierluigi.fiorini@liri.io>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
By using qWaitForWindowExposed instead of qWaitForWindowActivated.
Task-number: QTBUG-66824
Change-Id: Idf604157070731d9c92ccf64d8349c8571960b7c
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
The test actually passes, so there's no need to skip it.
Task-number: QTBUG-66824
Change-Id: Id091776ff7ca7637fdcf0e0ced833982b5788d92
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
After a37785ec76 went in, it become
apparent that multi mouse button state handling in qtestlib is
non-existent, for details see QTBUG-64030 and QTBUG-63786. What
happened behind the scenes often was not what one would expect based
on the provided QTest::mouse* input sequence - events went missing,
incorrect events were generated, each subsequent test function
started with a state set from the function that run earlier. It is
easy to see how a minor change in one test could easily affect outcome
of other tests.
With a37785ec76, Qt platform plugins
are now responsible for sending explicit mouse button type and state
information; qtestlib should take full responsibility now as well.
But using the new API from a37785ec7 alone in qtestlib is not sufficient.
We need to reset mouse state between each new test function run (we do
this at function scope as that fits with the current qtestlib API user
expectations). This patch implements the necessary reseting logic.
Updated tst_qwindow.cpp::generatedMouseMove() to use QTest::mouse* APIs.
That test requires pressing multiple buttons, it was not possible with
QTest::mouse* APIs before this patch.
Added an auto test for multiple mouse button pressing/release in
tests/auto/testlib/selftests/mouse/. And few other tests which are
currently QSKIP-ed, but should be considered when re-designing qtestlib
APIs.
Task-number: QTBUG-64030
Change-Id: I39fdcbc73a467a7463ce2aed622bf22484095635
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
Windows sends a mouse move with no buttons pressed to signal "Enter"
when a window is shown over the cursor. Discard the event and only
use it for generating QEvent::Enter as not to confuse tests.
This is preparing for the use of the new QPA API for mouse events.
Change-Id: I3eb7f3dad82d27d0b425c7eaf34b1eee11592074
Reviewed-by: Gatis Paeglis <gatis.paeglis@qt.io>
We have the ability to blacklist tests for CI runs now.
Task-number: QTBUG-35109
Change-Id: I8590e83faba764dce2d52e8c62e2e2c63f7bf219
Reviewed-by: Liang Qi <liang.qi@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
... that become apparent after switching qtestlib to use enhanced mouse
event (a37785ec76). With the old code path,
where QGuiApplication was deducing event type it would deduce mouse release
event even when there wasn't one. The new code path doesn't do that, which
revealed an obscure problem when mixing QTest::mouse* APIs (where QWindow
overload goes through QWindowSystemInterface API and QWidget overload goes
through QApplication::notify() and sets mouse_buttons from there). What
happened in this specific test case "./tst_qtreeview selection statusTip" was:
// tst_QTreeView::selection sets mouse_buttons = Qt::LeftButton from QApplication::notify
QTest::mousePress(widget, Qt::LeftButton, ..)
// tst_QTreeView::statusTip
QTest::mouseMove(window, )
The old code path sees that position and state has changed, creates a fake
mouse event, which gets deduced as mouse release even if there wasn't one.
And by luck this happened to set mouse_buttons=Qt::NoButton. So when we use
mouse_buttons later to create QMouseEvent everything works as expected. With
the enhanced mouse we don't clear the pressed button from mouse_buttons (set
in tst_QTreeView::selection) as this is done only from press/release events,
then pass it to QMouseEvent and later because of that QApplicationPrivate::
pickMouseReceiver() returns nullptr.
The fix here is to use e->buttons when constructing QMouseEvent, instead of
relying on mouse_buttons which gets changed from various places and has other
issues that can not be solved without invalidating the current documentation
of QGuiApplication::mouseButtons() (e.g QTBUG-33161). Tests and any Qt code
in general should avoid using the fragile QGuiApplication::mouseButtons() API.
This patch does not affect the old code path (it continues working as before)
and fixes the issue described above for the enhanced mouse API. The enhanced
mouse API actually is better in a way that it does not get affected by button
state from test functions that run earlier, as opposed to the old code path
where every subsequent test function uses mouse_buttons in whatever state it
was left by the test functions that run earlier.
Not relying on mouse_buttons when creating QMouseEvent helped also to discover
other logic error. This caused an in incorrect button state for a mouse move
event that is generated for a release event that simultaneously changes a mouse
position.
Task-number: QTBUG-64043
Change-Id: I6ad8e49d8437ab0858180c2d0d45694f3b3c2d60
Reviewed-by: Paul Olav Tvete <paul.tvete@qt.io>
From: https://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/events/exposure/expose.html
"The circumstances in which the X server generates Expose events
are not as definite as those for other events."
On windows with XCB_GRAVITY_NORTH_WEST flag set we should not get
expose events according to e2665600c0,
but as stated earlier this might not always be true.
Nevertheless, sometimes we get expose event from X server when shrinking
window, but most of the time we don't. Make the test not flakey by
checking that we get at least 1 expose event, instead of exactly 1.
Now running test 500 times in a loop does not fail.
Task-number: QTBUG-63424
Change-Id: I8004e622020cc09e11b7d592faf6d9ee1b9cfee2
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
(cherry picked from commit 542e11ab2b)
Reviewed-by: Tony Sarajärvi <tony.sarajarvi@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Liang Qi <liang.qi@qt.io>
The qWaitFor functions themselves can not trigger a test failure, as that
will not result in the test function exiting early, so every single call
to qWaitFor needs to be wrapped in a QVERIFY.
Change-Id: Id15a1549f31d06cdbf788e1d84ea431c28636ec8
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Swapping from RHEL 7.2 to 7.4 produces new autotest failures.
Task-number: QTBUG-63433
Change-Id: I3e59aa73b5874cfec06e166f521e06b0c7829743
Reviewed-by: Timur Pocheptsov <timur.pocheptsov@qt.io>
From: https://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/events/exposure/expose.html
"The circumstances in which the X server generates Expose events
are not as definite as those for other events."
On windows with XCB_GRAVITY_NORTH_WEST flag set we should not get
expose events according to e2665600c0,
but as stated earlier this might not always be true.
Nevertheless, sometimes we get expose event from X server when shrinking
window, but most of the time we don't. Make the test not flakey by
checking that we get at least 1 expose event, instead of exactly 1.
Now running test 500 times in a loop does not fail.
Task-number: QTBUG-63424
Change-Id: I8004e622020cc09e11b7d592faf6d9ee1b9cfee2
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
