Previously the method attempted to reset only as a last resort.
Now reset() is deprecated and resetting must happen between emitting
modelAboutToBeReset() and modelReset(). Since this suffices in all
cases to notify views that they must reinterrogate the model, it is no
longer necessary to signal explicitly row removals and insertions
within the scope of the reset.
Additionally, fetchMore() is now called within the scope of the reset
so insert signals do not have to be emitted here either.
This improved handling of resetting in QSqlQueryModel also allows the
cache in QSqlTableModel to be cleared directly at select().
This change may actually allow views to operate more efficiently since
they no longer have to react to separate row removal and insert
signals. Views can avoid pointless deallocation and reallocation
by considering row count only after the reset is finished. The cost is
that the columns and horizontal headers must be considered in the view
at each setQuery() call. In any case, it is not clear that trying to
be smart about this in the model justifies additional complexity.
Tests had to be adjusted where they expected explicit row removal
and insert signals.
Change-Id: I4f7eac1419824361d7d9bdcc6a87092b33e80d7a
Task-Id: QTBUG-25419
Reviewed-by: Andy Shaw <andy.shaw@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Honglei Zhang <honglei.zhang@nokia.com>
QSqlTableModel::headerData() generates a crash if an invalid filter
is set. QSqlQueryModel::indexInQuery() should check the index value
before applied to d->colOffsets[].
QSqlQueryModel::initRecordAndPrimaryIndex() is updated to sync the
size of rec and colOffsets.
Task-number: QTBUG-23879
Change-Id: Ic9f88bb288592aa6fb3c1415cc818632dadaab56
Reviewed-by: Michael Goddard <michael.goddard@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brand <mabrand@mabrand.nl>
For OnFieldChange and OnRowChange, we don't want more than one row in
the cache with uncommitted changes. This could happen if deletion in
the database fails while other changes are pending.
Chosen solution is to return false if other rows have pending changes.
Also, we only allow 1 row removed at a time.
Updated test, changes and documentation.
Change-Id: I68baf6d221789b4754e891535070011c759a2155
Reviewed-by: Honglei Zhang <honglei.zhang@nokia.com>
The model can never do a good job of knowing when user moves to a
new row in the view. Faking it by detecting when another row
is changed was not a good solution because it cannot detect
when the last edited row is left.
Either the view should automatically submit when the user leaves
a row or the application should provide a way to submit.
This change made it possible to reuse the logic of flags() in
setData().
Change-Id: I2550e5b113bceba1a852fc21203babeca07c5748
Reviewed-by: Honglei Zhang <honglei.zhang@nokia.com>
For OnFieldChange and OnRowChange, inserting rows should not be
allowed if there are pending changes in cache.
Change-Id: Ia794332959a35a1de87e798ba1a74ace3dfae68f
Reviewed-by: Honglei Zhang <honglei.zhang@nokia.com>
For OnFieldChange and OnRowChange, before submitting new changes,
setData() and setRecord() attempt to submit pending changes and
revert them upon failure. However, they fail to consider that
reverting pending insertions removes rows from the model. As a
result, the new change can be applied to a row higher than intended.
One possible solution would be to adjust the targetted index for the
removed rows, so that the intended row is affected by the new change.
But this still causes the strange editing experience as rows jump
up just as they are being edited.
It does not seem right in the first place for the model to initiate
reverting changes. It should be up to the application to decide what
to do when data cannot be committed. In particular, setData() and
setRecord() should not have the side effect of reverting already
pending changes.
The chosen solution is simply to refuse new changes that don't make
sense for the edit strategy. For OnFieldChange, flag() will
indicate read-only when editing is blocked by a pending change.
Since setData() and setRecord() submit data immediately for
OnFieldChange, it no longer makes sense to resubmit changes
automatically before a new change.
For OnRowChange, setData() keeps the behavior of automatically
submitting a pending row before starting on a new row. This is
historical behavior and is probably motivated by the fact that
QTableView does not automatically call submit() when editing leaves a
row. The obvious shortcoming of this is that the last row to be edited
will not be submitted automatically. It also prevents us from flagging
rows other than the pending row as read-only.
For OnRowChange, setRecord(), being row-oriented by nature, should
submit the change immediately rather than waiting for the next call
to setRecord(). This makes setRecord() consistent with insertRecord().
Change-Id: Icb4019d8b7c53a7ee48f8121a7a525e8bc35d523
Reviewed-by: Honglei Zhang <honglei.zhang@nokia.com>
Checks if model has any changes to submit.
Includes new test covering isDirty(index) as well the new
overloaded function.
Task-number: QTBUG-3108
Change-Id: I0ccbda45d5d9f06434cf1e1c037a9efb76d0cc37
Reviewed-by: Honglei Zhang <honglei.zhang@nokia.com>
Calling select refreshes the query data but disrupts view
navigation.
For OnFieldChange and OnRecordChange it makes sense to only
select the row in question. This does not disturb view navigation.
Assume disruption of view navigation is not a problem
for OnManualSubmit because the user or application decides
when submitAll is called.
Task-number: QTBUG-2875
Change-Id: I1e5f68668fb9102f6296d67d543e80daa403f1c4
Reviewed-by: Yunqiao Yin <charles.yin@nokia.com>
Once an insert has been submitted, the cached record behaves like an
update. For row bookkeeping, we still have to remember that it was
originally inserted and is not in the query rows.
Between submitting a delete and selecting, we remove the values
from the deleted record. This causes a blank row to be displayed.
Read-only flag is set for cells in deleted row.
Reverting between submit and select means going back to the last
submitted values.
When removing rows, it's better to process from highest row numbers
to lowest. This avoids complications with higher rows shifting down
when lower rows are removed.
Change-Id: I8752fa11f7a1b88f2a71b9e03a020ac37e62487f
Reviewed-by: Honglei Zhang <honglei.zhang@nokia.com>
The purpose of the hack was to fool QSqlQueryModel into signaling the
removal of extra rows via rowsRemoved(). The extra rows are the
inserted rows generated by QSqlTableModel.
While it is important to signal the removal of all the rows before
requerying after committing changes, there is a cleaner way. The
table model should remove its rows before the query model removes its
rows.
Iterating backwards avoids having to decrement row numbers above ones
being removed.
Expected test results have been adjusted for these changes.
Change-Id: I0e8aa81f5e7b8fea5922f5ffd1cfb4a932313a10
Reviewed-by: Yunqiao Yin <charles.yin@nokia.com>
Fix up for f5e1da12f0.
Change-Id: I3a730ce7e47d71551a46cc105ba2d1fe4e33b65b
Reviewed-by: Robin Burchell <robin+qt@viroteck.net>
Reviewed-by: Yunqiao Yin <charles.yin@nokia.com>
Previously, if any fields in the supplied record could not be matched
with a column in the target table, dataChanged() was supressed for all
columns for OnManualSubmit. This is not good because it prevents other
views from noticing the fields that *do* change.
It's simplest and probably more efficient just to emit
dataChanged() once for the whole row. Fewer signals need to be
processed and in typical cases much or all of the row is likely to
be changed anyway.
Change-Id: Ib56bf9a18e51b9cb85771acefcb2bf26e295a54e
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@nokia.com>
In an apparent attempt to be economical with emitting dataChanged()
and submitting SQL to the databse, setRecord() compares each field
value of the record with the old value, taking action only when
a difference is detected. Several complaints against this code are:
-The comparision does not work on float type.
-It is really up to the application and database to decide this. The
model should make few assumptions. The application has the option to
omit fields from the record that should be ignored.
-The current behavior seems to assume that the "old" values are the
current state of the database, but the database may have changed since
the model was last refreshed.
-The code compares the value from record(), which probably
corresponds to the EditRole, with the DisplayRole value from data().
Change-Id: I11477c185eb411d442144dc682893d0df12d03d5
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@nokia.com>
Qt 5 seems like a welcome opportunity to stop emitting this
spurious beforeDelete signal.
Change-Id: Ib8628343ca9b8fdd85c154a206c7e2bf2c4c9dc1
Reviewed-by: Yunqiao Yin <charles.yin@nokia.com>
As in the past, to avoid rewriting various autotests that contain
line-number information, an extra blank line has been inserted at the
end of the license text to ensure that this commit does not change the
total number of lines in the license header.
Change-Id: I311e001373776812699d6efc045b5f742890c689
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
These comments were mostly empty or inaccurate. Appropriate naming of
tests and appropriate placement of tests within the directory tree
provide more reliable indicators of what is being tested.
Change-Id: Ib6bf373d9e79917e4ab1417ee5c1264a2c2d7027
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
QSqlRelationalTableModel doesn't follow relations on the first column
of a table. The DisplayRole and the EditRole for indexes on column 0
are always the same. The bug is found in QSqlRelationalTableModel::data.
Task-number: QTBUG-20038
Change-Id: Ie1e98b5f46ffc171113f2d51b9b19ff5febb1c3c
Reviewed-by: Yunqiao Yin <charles.yin@nokia.com>
qttest_p4.prf was added as a convenience for Qt's own autotests in Qt4.
It enables various crufty undocumented magic, of dubious value.
Stop using it, and explicitly enable the things from it which we want.
Change-Id: I02fe27b2c1800f929250fa8694ca2976c9661a12
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
The previous commit removed SkipMode from the testlib APi. This commit
removes the parameter from all calls to QSKIP.
Task-number: QTBUG-21851, QTBUG-21652
Change-Id: I21c0ee6731c1bc6ac6d962590d9b31d7459dfbc5
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
The removed warnings just repeat information that is already in the
QSKIP's that immediately follow the warnings.
Change-Id: Id13158487e8075aab8a8f48955303edde3f4af63
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt-project.org/6194
Reviewed-by: Qt Sanity Bot <qt_sanity_bot@ovi.com>
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
QSKIP already causes the test function that calls it to return, so the
returns removed by this commit were unreachable.
Change-Id: I1fa2f3a3271927d8a600b02d8b31bd81db9146b1
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt-project.org/6188
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
Symbian is not a supported platform for Qt5, so this code is no longer
required.
Change-Id: I1172e6a42d518490e63e9599bf10579df08259aa
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt-project.org/5657
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
This is in preparation of removing testlib's
dependency on QtGui and QtWidgets.
Autotests that need QtWidgets api must
explicitly include it (since the types are no
longer provided by the QtGui master header).
Autotests that don't need QtGui or QtWidgets
api shouldn't link against those libraries.
Change-Id: I2808289068514fcac582808828ad4634e2631733
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt-project.org/5093
Reviewed-by: Qt Sanity Bot <qt_sanity_bot@ovi.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
