[ChangeLog][qmake] A new feature "cmdline" was added that implies
"CONFIG += console" and "CONFIG -= app_bundle".
Task-number: QTBUG-27079
Change-Id: I6e52b07c9341c904bb1424fc717057432f9360e1
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
The vast majority is actually switched to QRandomGenerator::bounded(),
which gives a mostly uniform distribution over the [0, bound)
range. There are very few floating point cases left, as many of those
that did use floating point did not need to, after all. (I did leave
some that were too ugly for me to understand)
This commit also found a couple of calls to rand() instead of qrand().
This commit does not include changes to SSL code that continues to use
qrand() (job for someone else):
src/network/ssl/qsslkey_qt.cpp
src/network/ssl/qsslsocket_mac.cpp
tests/auto/network/ssl/qsslsocket/tst_qsslsocket.cpp
Change-Id: Icd0e0d4b27cb4e5eb892fffd14b5285d43f4afbf
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Commit 12c5264d9a fixed the calculation of
SHA-3 in QCryptographicHash: we were previously calculating Keccak.
Unfortunately, turns out that replacing the algorithm wasn't the best
idea: there are people who need to compare with the result obtained from
a previous version of Qt and stored somewhere. This commit restores the
enum values 7 through 10 to mean Keccak and moves SHA-3 to 12 through
15. The "Sha3_nnn" enums will switch between the two according to the
QT_SHA3_KECCAK_COMPAT macro.
[ChangeLog][Important Behavior Changes] This version of Qt restores
compatibility with pre-5.9.0 calculation of QCryptographicHash
algorithms that were labelled "Sha3_nnn": that is, applications compiled
with old versions of Qt will continue using the Keccak algorithm.
Applications recompiled with this version will use SHA-3, unless
QT_SHA3_KECCAK_COMPAT is #define'd prior to #include
<QCryptographicHash>.
[ChangeLog][Binary Compatibility Note] This version of Qt changes the
values assigned to enumerations QCryptographicHash::Sha3_nnn.
Applications compiled with this version and using those enumerations
will not work with Qt 5.9.0 and 5.9.1, unless QT_SHA3_KECCAK_COMPAT is
defined.
Task-number: QTBUG-62025
Discussed-at: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-September/030818.html
Change-Id: I6e1fe42ae4b742a7b811fffd14e418fc04f096c3
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Not that we require it, but since The Qt Company did it for all files
they have copyright, even if they haven't touched the file in years
(especially not in 2016), I'm doing the same.
Change-Id: I7a9e11d7b64a4cc78e24ffff142b4c9d53039846
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
From Qt 5.7 -> tools & applications are lisenced under GPL v3 with some
exceptions, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new GPL-EXCEPT header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under GPL 3 with exceptions)
Change-Id: I42a473ddc97101492a60b9287d90979d9eb35ae1
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
Qt copyrights are now in The Qt Company, so we could update the source
code headers accordingly. In the same go we should also fix the links to
point to qt.io.
Outdated header.LGPL removed (use header.LGPL21 instead)
Old header.LGPL3 renamed to header.LGPL3-COMM to match actual licensing
combination. New header.LGPL-COMM taken in the use file which were
using old header.LGPL3 (src/plugins/platforms/android/extract.cpp)
Added new header.LGPL3 containing Commercial + LGPLv3 + GPLv2 license
combination
Change-Id: I6f49b819a8a20cc4f88b794a8f6726d975e8ffbe
Reviewed-by: Matti Paaso <matti.paaso@theqtcompany.com>
Some quick benchmarks against GNU coreutils 8.21 and OpenSSL 1.0.1e
(time in µs; time for coreutils and OpenSSL include the loading of the
executable):
Qt Coreutils OpenSSL
n SHA-1 SHA-224 SHA-512 SHA-1 SHA-224 SHA-512 SHA-1 SHA-224 SHA-512
0 0 0 0 717 716 700 2532 2553 2522
64k 120 484 381 927 1074 966 2618 2782 2694
Diff 120 484 381 210 358 266 86 229 172
The numbers for Qt are pretty stable and vary very little; the numbers
for the other two vary quite a bit, since they involve launching and
executing separate processes. We can take the lesson that we're in the
same ballpark for SHA-1 and we should investigate whether our SHA2
implementation is sufficiently optimized.
Change-Id: Ib081d002ed57c4f43741eca45ff5cd13b97b6276
Reviewed-by: Richard J. Moore <rich@kde.org>
