Do this regardless of whether the event subclass
is public API or only used in examples. Examples
are examples, used by others as templates or even
copied verbatim, so they should also follow sound
engineering rules.
Anyway, there's only one in examples/...
Change-Id: I586ff16407a956c9e89288fdd4377eed73f45c0f
Reviewed-by: Samuel Rødal <samuel.rodal@nokia.com>
As in the past, to avoid rewriting various autotests that contain
line-number information, an extra blank line has been inserted at the
end of the license text to ensure that this commit does not change the
total number of lines in the license header.
Change-Id: I311e001373776812699d6efc045b5f742890c689
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
The capability flags indicate which information is valid in the touch
points. Previously there was no way to tell if e.g. the value returned
by pressure() is actually the value provided by the driver/device or
it is just something bogus due to pressure not being supported.
The points' flags return information about the individual touch
points. One use case is to differentiate between touches made by
finger and pen.
Velocity, if available, is now also exposed.
Each touch point can now contain an additional list of "raw"
positions. These points are not reported individually but are taken
into account in some way by the underlying device and drivers to
generate the final, "accurate" touch point. In case the underlying
drivers expose these additional positions, they are made available in
the lists returned by the touch points' rawScreenPosition().
The raw positions are only available in screen coordinates to prevent
wasting time with mapping from global positions in applications that
do not use this data. Instead, apps can query the QWindow to which the
touch event was sent via QTouchEvent::window() and can call
mapFromGlobal() manually if they need local raw positions.
The capability and device type information is now held in a new
QTouchDevice class. Each touch event will contain only a pointer to
one of the global QTouchDevice instances. On top of type and
capability, the new class also contains a name which can be used to
differentiate between multiple touch input devices (i.e. to tell from
which one a given QTouchEvent originates from).
The introduction of QTouchDevice has three implications: The
QTouchEvent constructor and QWindowSystemInterface::handleTouchEvent
need to be changed (to pass a QTouchDevice pointer instead of merely a
device type value), and each platform or generic plug-in is now
responsible for registering one or more devices using the new API
QWindowSystemInterface::registerTouchDevice.
Change-Id: Ic1468d3e43933d8b5691d75aa67c43e1bc7ffe3e
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
These comments were mostly empty or inaccurate. Appropriate naming of
tests and appropriate placement of tests within the directory tree
provide more reliable indicators of what is being tested.
Change-Id: Ib6bf373d9e79917e4ab1417ee5c1264a2c2d7027
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
Currently there seems to be no precise definition of what
an integrationtest is in the context of Qt testing.
To avoid confusion, the tests under integrationtests/ are
moved into other/ (which is effectively where we keep
tests that don't clearly fit into any other category).
Tests can be moved back into an integrationtests/ directory
at a later point, should an unambiguous definition be established.
Change-Id: I3bb289be2dc2aca11b51a8ce8fcc5942f06d6c5c
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
