QT_CONFIG is supposed to contain configure output, not a list of
modules. for example, enumerating modules is not cleanly possible if
modules are mixed with other flags.
the conflation was merely historical, due to webkit and phonon doing
it this way in the preliminary qt4 modularization.
we now have a much cleaner way to query modules (qtHaveModule(<module>),
or less recently, !isEmpty(QT.<module>.name)), which is already used
throughout Qt.
the old way was supposed to be removed for 5.0 already, but it slipped.
better do it now, before people actually start using it.
Change-Id: Iabdf0cdfaab9cd674f634f4c6ece105b2039c850
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
modules which demand it (i.e., qtwebkit) need forwarding pris, etc.,
even when not making a -prefix build.
Change-Id: Id405be8763e94cc074854f799bd785e9cdf62e8e
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Andras Becsi <andras.becsi@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com>
if the libraries are in a non-standard location, but no rpath is used,
rpath-link is needed. this is often the case for non-prefix builds
(which have no forwarding pris any more).
as we cannot store absolute paths in the final pris, we need to store the
module names, and resolve them only at use time.
Change-Id: I1538b5d531611c76a2d7058a3b2ff683bdcbe427
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
as everything is built inside the common build/install dir, there is
no point in the fwd pri stuff.
as a "side effect", this makes it more straight-forward to relocate
non-prefix builds, which is the default on windows.
Task-number: QTBUG-28827
Change-Id: I010246a9ad87cf74974dc168768b1a8625f73260
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
move the regular pri file creation into the "sub-prf" and rename it
accordingly. the original reason for the split was the deep magic in
activeqt (and phonon), which is gone now.
Change-Id: If40e941afc9293725630ed6bcf3e4ef18a692f66
Reviewed-by: Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@digia.com>
