Introduce a specialization for qCompare(QImage,QImage) that
checks isNull, size and format and outputs verbose messages.
Check isNull, size similarly for QPixmap.
Add an autotest:
- Add test to cmptest and make it a GUI application since
QImage requires QGuiApplication.
- Make testlib/selftests capable of running X11-GUI applications
by passing DISPLAY.
- Ignore stderr output for cmptest
- Add test data
Change-Id: I2b29c7822fbeedf2b22c90889739ed7ff859ce92
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
The old test only verified the behaviour of QCOMPARE when comparing
lists that were different. Add data rows for comparing empty lists and
non-empty lists that are equal.
Note that testlib currently does not report passing data rows (only
failing rows and completely passing test functions), so the new data
rows do not cause any change in the expected test output.
Change-Id: I137650ce0ca6250cee36bd9cb74b01f8abd4e89c
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
The (disabled) alive selftest contained a test for the QStringList
specialization of the QTest::qCompare template. This test is unrelated
to the rest of the alive selftest, so move it to the cmptest selftest,
where QCOMPARE is tested.
Change-Id: Ic6f0e491dd3b3ce8b4ca1d49666a099815575eaa
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
Each QVariant instance has internal storage which may be
used for well-know basic types. This patch changes the
behavior by delegating type dependent operation to QMetaType
class which knows more types than QVariant itself.
The patch significantly reduce amount of code in QVariant
implementation.
There are few side effects of this patch:
- better performance:
* for Core types when using Gui (QGuiVariant is able to
construct Core types)
* for small custom types (QVariant::Private::Data is used for all
types that has size small enough)
- comparing two QVariants can give different result for small custom
types (binary comparison instead of pointer comparison)
Change-Id: Ic17fa500d6a882110bfba896fd456c8e6c7a63a9
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
