0f3c9782e6
This test became a real pain recently. A close look at the test shows several problems (strangely enough, the failure can never be reproduced on real machines, only on VM - Ubuntu and RHEL 6.6). There are several asserts that are firing from time to time here and there. They show that the logic in test is broken/incorrect. QNAM can open several connections to a host, our test then incorrectly resets its 'client' data-member and bad things can later happen after 'bytesWrittenSlot' executed (and deleted a socket). For example, I can reproduce this scenario in every second run: 1. incoming connection -> client = socket(descriptor), connect to client's readyRead (s1) 2. incoming connection -> client = socket(descriptor), connect to client's readyRead (s2) QNAM sends a request on s1. We reply on s2 (which is already wrong) and call client->deleteLater(), which resets client to nullptr. If QNAM sends something else on s1, we hit assert(!client.isNull()). To avoid this, whenever 'sender' in any slot is different from the 'client', we use the actual 'sender' to reply. Another problem is this weird and rather cryptic waitForFinish which is not needed in this particular test since we wait for reply error, not 'finished'. As it happened before - it's not clear if these two problems were the cause of guaranteed fails on CI - an integration failed ~10 times in a row in the same test (not happening anymore though). Task-number: QTBUG-64569 Change-Id: Id9aa091290350c61fadf1c3c001e7c2e1b5ac8f4 Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto | ||
| baselineserver | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| global | ||
| manual | ||
| shared | ||
| README | ||
| tests.pro | ||
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order
to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the
test environment that these tests are written for.
Linux X11:
* The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the
autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections.
* The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop.
* Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many
tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus
and activation.
* Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window
manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not
wait for the user to click the window.