124b9a6ff8
There were still two cases where spurious notifications would be
possible:
- user calls hasPendingDatagrams()/pendingDatagramSize() on UDP
socket somewhere outside the slot connected to readyRead()
signal (::WSARecvFrom posts FD_READ notification, even if
a notification for incoming datagram already exists in the
message queue);
- a socket was registered to receive several types of event and
WM_QT_ACTIVATENOTIFIERS message is located between the
different events for this socket in the queue.
Provided patch ensures that the message queue is synchronized with
the Qt event processing mechanism and adds a way to detect spurious
notifications inside the window procedure.
Task-number: QTBUG-58214
Change-Id: I49609dace601f300de09875ff1653617efabd72f
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Wolff <oliver.wolff@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto | ||
| baselineserver | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| global | ||
| manual | ||
| shared | ||
| README | ||
| tests.pro | ||
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order
to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the
test environment that these tests are written for.
Linux X11:
* The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the
autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections.
* The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop.
* Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many
tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus
and activation.
* Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window
manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not
wait for the user to click the window.