29af4b1833
It noted that an unspecified function claimed the offset it was checking should be +1, while testing it against that or -1. The function turns out to be QDateTime::addDays(), whose doc did indeed, misleadingly, say that it lands after a gap it would have hit. It in fact overshoots the gap in the direction of its change. Amend its docs, likewise those of addMonths() and addYears(), to reflect the true behavior. Amend the test to look at the direction of the step its taking and anticipate that the adjustment will be in the same direction; then compare the actual adjustment to that. Change-Id: I9ab918fac0ab2195ef014983f37fccc435bf0498 Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
auto | ||
baseline | ||
benchmarks | ||
global | ||
libfuzzer | ||
manual | ||
shared | ||
testserver | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
README |
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the test environment that these tests are written for. Linux X11: * The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections. * The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop. * Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus and activation. * Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not wait for the user to click the window.