2a24c3c268
As it were, QStringLists were not handled explicitly when comparing QVariants. If both QStringLists contained only a single entry, they were treated as QStrings - if both QStringLists were empty, there were equal (correctly so) - but if one of the QStringLists had more than one entry, the compare function fell through to returning always 1. As discussed here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/38492467/3444217 Added rich comparison tests for all non-numerical, non-recursive QVariants that support them (except QModelIndex and QPersistentModelIndex) Task-number: QTBUG-54893 Change-Id: Icc5480d9ba056ee5efe83da566c5829caa1509d7 Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@theqtcompany.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto | ||
| baselineserver | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| global | ||
| manual | ||
| shared | ||
| README | ||
| tests.pro | ||
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order
to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the
test environment that these tests are written for.
Linux X11:
* The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the
autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections.
* The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop.
* Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many
tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus
and activation.
* Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window
manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not
wait for the user to click the window.