Give the macro and its parameters clearer names, wrap the macro body
in do {...} while (0), use QCOMPARE() rather than QVERIFY()ing
comparisons, convert the result type to QMetaType::Type rather than
QVariant's deprecated equivalent, save one macro parameter by using
decltype() on another. Simplify one check by pulling out a common
sub-expression as a local variable.
In the process, give the settings keys meaningful names rather than
just "key" with a numeric suffix.
Ideally this test would be reworked to be data-driven, instead of
using macros, but the use of qvariant_cast<> to convert a read-back
value, along with the variable type of the input value compared to the
result of that cast, precludes this (as far as I can see).
Change-Id: I4e083cd0dea14d723910873829352e15740006bd
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
2b16997116