369305a9be
In particular, document the mis-behavior it takes for granted in one test. Renamed some variables so that they're visually distinct from one another and actually mean something intelligible. Renamed the sub-tests to say what's actually happening. Reading the test output now at least makes it possible to see what's wrong. I'll fix that in a later commit. Task-number: QTBUG-61774 Change-Id: I3e5f83b8baa3c6afbca9231b5bbc89d17f3e57e2 Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@qt.io> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
auto | ||
baselineserver | ||
benchmarks | ||
global | ||
libfuzzer | ||
manual | ||
shared | ||
testserver | ||
README | ||
tests.pro |
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the test environment that these tests are written for. Linux X11: * The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections. * The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop. * Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus and activation. * Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not wait for the user to click the window.