3760120ab3
The test is just wrong. It suggests, that it tests minimal block size, but in reality it is checking if a maximal peak of block size is bigger then expected minimum block size. The minimal block size is 1, not 1024 / ideal threads count and it is defined in BlockSizeManagerV2. The maximal block size is defined and it is fixed, but it is an implementation detail, probably not worth testing. The test is based on a race condition as peakBegin and peakBlockSize are modified in parallel from multiple threads, without any synchronization. Change-Id: I430eedcf83b0fa3e2ce2cfd294eaee7b301e48ae Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
auto | ||
baselineserver | ||
benchmarks | ||
global | ||
manual | ||
shared | ||
README | ||
tests.pro |
This directory contains autotests and benchmarks based on Qt Test. In order to run the autotests reliably, you need to configure a desktop to match the test environment that these tests are written for. Linux X11: * The user must be logged in to an active desktop; you can't run the autotests without a valid DISPLAY that allows X11 connections. * The tests are run against a KDE3 or KDE4 desktop. * Window manager uses "click to focus", and not "focus follows mouse". Many tests move the mouse cursor around and expect this to not affect focus and activation. * Disable "click to activate", i.e., when a window is opened, the window manager should automatically activate it (give it input focus) and not wait for the user to click the window.