21e9c223b7
The skipcleanup and failcleanup tests were actually testing skip and
fail in cleanupTestCase(), not in cleanup(). Add almost-duplicate
tests and clean up so that we now have {fail,skip}cleanup(,testcase}
tests to cover all four cases. Generated expected output. The new
tests (with old names) get their fail or skip - during cleanup() -
reported against the test instead of the cleanupTestCase function.
(Results for {init,cleanup}TestCase() are always reported, even when
these slots are not defined, as no-op passes.)
Pick-to: 6.4
Change-Id: I0988d1696b50c0e2f30c45ddc25e1bd0bfd2151a
Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
9 lines
450 B
Plaintext
9 lines
450 B
Plaintext
********* Start testing of tst_FailCleanup *********
|
|
Config: Using QtTest library
|
|
PASS : tst_FailCleanup::initTestCase()
|
|
FAIL! : tst_FailCleanup::aTestFunction() 'false' returned FALSE. (Fail inside cleanup)
|
|
Loc: [qtbase/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/failcleanup/tst_failcleanup.cpp(0)]
|
|
PASS : tst_FailCleanup::cleanupTestCase()
|
|
Totals: 2 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 0ms
|
|
********* Finished testing of tst_FailCleanup *********
|