05fc3aef53
Replace the current license disclaimer in files by a SPDX-License-Identifier. Files that have to be modified by hand are modified. License files are organized under LICENSES directory. Task-number: QTBUG-67283 Change-Id: Id880c92784c40f3bbde861c0d93f58151c18b9f1 Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org> Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Jörg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
398 lines
13 KiB
C++
398 lines
13 KiB
C++
// Copyright (C) 2021 The Qt Company Ltd.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR GPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-GPL-exception-1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <QtCore/QCoreApplication>
|
|
#include <QTest>
|
|
|
|
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(QTest::TestFailMode)
|
|
|
|
class tst_ExpectFail: public QObject
|
|
{
|
|
Q_OBJECT
|
|
|
|
private slots:
|
|
void cleanupTestCase() const;
|
|
void init() const;
|
|
void xfailAndContinue() const;
|
|
void xfailAndAbort() const;
|
|
void xfailContinueSkip() const;
|
|
void xfailAbortSkip() const;
|
|
void xfailTwice() const;
|
|
void xfailDataDrivenTwice() const;
|
|
void xfailDataDrivenTwice_data() const { xfailDataDriven_data(false); }
|
|
void xfailWithQString() const;
|
|
void xfailDataDrivenWithQString_data() const { xfailDataDriven_data(false); }
|
|
void xfailDataDrivenWithQString() const;
|
|
void xfailDataDrivenWithQVerify_data() const { xfailDataDriven_data(false); }
|
|
void xfailDataDrivenWithQVerify() const;
|
|
void xfailDataDrivenWithQCompare_data() const { xfailDataDriven_data(false); }
|
|
void xfailDataDrivenWithQCompare() const;
|
|
void xfailOnWrongRow_data() const { xfailDataDriven_data(true); }
|
|
void xfailOnWrongRow() const;
|
|
void xfailOnAnyRow_data() const { xfailDataDriven_data(true); }
|
|
void xfailOnAnyRow() const;
|
|
void xfailWithoutCheck_data() const { xfailDataDriven_data(true); }
|
|
void xfailWithoutCheck() const;
|
|
void xpassAbort() const;
|
|
void xpassAbortSkip() const;
|
|
void xpassAbortXfailContinue() const;
|
|
void xpassContinue() const;
|
|
void xpassContinueSkip() const;
|
|
void xpassContinueXfailAbort() const;
|
|
void xpassAbortDataDrivenWithQVerify_data() const { xpassDataDriven_data(); }
|
|
void xpassAbortDataDrivenWithQVerify() const;
|
|
void xpassContinueDataDrivenWithQVerify_data() const { xpassDataDriven_data(); }
|
|
void xpassContinueDataDrivenWithQVerify() const;
|
|
void xpassAbortDataDrivenWithQCompare_data() const { xpassDataDriven_data(); }
|
|
void xpassAbortDataDrivenWithQCompare() const;
|
|
void xpassContinueDataDrivenWithQCompare_data() const { xpassDataDriven_data(); }
|
|
void xpassContinueDataDrivenWithQCompare() const;
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
void xfailDataDriven_data(bool failOnly) const;
|
|
void xpassDataDriven_data() const;
|
|
};
|
|
static int casesTested = 2;
|
|
// What the totals line's numbers *should* be:
|
|
static int passed = 2, failed = 0, skipped = 0;
|
|
// Total and passed get {init,cleanup}TestCase() in addition to the actual tests.
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::init() const
|
|
{
|
|
++casesTested;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::cleanupTestCase() const
|
|
{
|
|
qDebug("Totals should add up to %d: %d passed, %d failed, %d skipped",
|
|
casesTested, passed, failed, skipped);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailAndContinue() const
|
|
{
|
|
++passed;
|
|
qDebug("begin");
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This should xfail", Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY(false);
|
|
qDebug("after");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailAndAbort() const
|
|
{
|
|
++passed;
|
|
qDebug("begin");
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This should xfail", Abort);
|
|
QVERIFY(false);
|
|
|
|
// If we get here the test did not correctly abort on the previous QVERIFY.
|
|
QVERIFY2(false, "This should not be reached");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailContinueSkip() const
|
|
{
|
|
++skipped;
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This should xfail then skip", Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY(false);
|
|
QSKIP("This skip should be reported and counted");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailAbortSkip() const
|
|
{
|
|
++passed;
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This should xfail", Abort);
|
|
QVERIFY(false);
|
|
|
|
// If we get here the test did not correctly abort on the previous QVERIFY.
|
|
QSKIP("This skip should not be reached");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailTwice() const
|
|
{
|
|
++failed;
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL once is fine", Continue);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL when already expecting a failure is "
|
|
"an error and should abort this test function", Continue);
|
|
|
|
// If we get here the test did not correctly abort on the double call to QEXPECT_FAIL.
|
|
QVERIFY2(false, "This should not be reached");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailDataDrivenTwice() const
|
|
{
|
|
++failed;
|
|
// Same with data-driven cases (twist semantics of unused shouldPass; we
|
|
// have four combinations to test):
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Pass Abort", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL once on a test-case is fine", Abort);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Pass Abort", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL when already expecting a failure is "
|
|
"an error and should abort this test function", Continue);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Abort", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL once on a test-case is fine", Abort);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Abort", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL when already expecting a failure is "
|
|
"an error and should abort this test function", Abort);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Pass Continue", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL once on a test-case is fine", Continue);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Pass Continue", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL when already expecting a failure is "
|
|
"an error and should abort this test function", Abort);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Continue", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL once on a test-case is fine", Continue);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Continue", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL when already expecting a failure is "
|
|
"an error and should abort this test function", Continue);
|
|
|
|
// If we get here the test did not correctly abort on the double call to QEXPECT_FAIL.
|
|
QVERIFY2(false, "This should not be reached");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailWithQString() const
|
|
{
|
|
++passed;
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", QString("A string").toLatin1().constData(), Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY(false);
|
|
|
|
int bugNo = 5;
|
|
QLatin1String msg("The message");
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", QString("Bug %1 (%2)").arg(bugNo).arg(msg).toLatin1().constData(), Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY(false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailDataDrivenWithQString() const
|
|
{
|
|
// This test does not (yet) distinguish the two Pass cases.
|
|
QFETCH(bool, shouldPass);
|
|
QFETCH(QTest::TestFailMode, failMode);
|
|
if (shouldPass || failMode == QTest::Continue)
|
|
++skipped;
|
|
else
|
|
++passed;
|
|
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Abort", QString("A string").toLatin1().constData(), Abort);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Continue", QString("A string").toLatin1().constData(), Continue);
|
|
// TODO: why aren't QVERIFY2()'s smessages seen ?
|
|
QVERIFY2(shouldPass, "Both Fail cases should XFAIL here");
|
|
// Fail Abort should be gone now.
|
|
|
|
int bugNo = 5;
|
|
QLatin1String msg("The message");
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Continue", qPrintable(QString("Bug %1 (%2)").arg(bugNo).arg(msg)), Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY2(shouldPass, "Only Fail Continue should see this");
|
|
|
|
// FAIL is a pass, and SKIP trumps pass.
|
|
QSKIP("Each Continue or Pass reports this and increments skip-count");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailDataDrivenWithQVerify() const
|
|
{
|
|
// This test does not (yet) distinguish the two Pass cases.
|
|
++passed;
|
|
QFETCH(bool, shouldPass);
|
|
QFETCH(QTest::TestFailMode, failMode);
|
|
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Abort", "This test should xfail", Abort);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Continue", "This test should xfail", Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY2(shouldPass, "Both Fail cases should XFAIL here");
|
|
|
|
// If we get here, either we expected to pass or we expected to
|
|
// fail and the failure mode was Continue.
|
|
if (!shouldPass)
|
|
QCOMPARE(failMode, QTest::Continue);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailDataDriven_data(bool failOnly) const
|
|
{
|
|
QTest::addColumn<bool>("shouldPass");
|
|
QTest::addColumn<QTest::TestFailMode>("failMode");
|
|
|
|
if (!failOnly) {
|
|
QTest::newRow("Pass Abort") << true << QTest::Abort;
|
|
QTest::newRow("Pass Continue") << true << QTest::Continue;
|
|
}
|
|
QTest::newRow("Fail Abort") << false << QTest::Abort;
|
|
QTest::newRow("Fail Continue") << false << QTest::Continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailDataDrivenWithQCompare() const
|
|
{
|
|
// This test does not (yet) distinguish the two Pass cases.
|
|
++passed;
|
|
QFETCH(bool, shouldPass);
|
|
QFETCH(QTest::TestFailMode, failMode);
|
|
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Abort", "This test should xfail", Abort);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Continue", "This test should xfail", Continue);
|
|
|
|
QCOMPARE(1, shouldPass ? 1 : 2);
|
|
|
|
// If we get here, either we expected to pass or we expected to
|
|
// fail and the failure mode was Continue.
|
|
if (!shouldPass)
|
|
QCOMPARE(failMode, QTest::Continue);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailOnWrongRow() const
|
|
{
|
|
++passed;
|
|
qDebug("Should pass (*not* xpass), despite test-case name");
|
|
// QEXPECT_FAIL for a row that does not exist should be ignored.
|
|
// (It might be conditional data(), so exist in other circumstances.)
|
|
QFETCH(QTest::TestFailMode, failMode);
|
|
// You can't pass a variable as the last parameter of QEXPECT_FAIL,
|
|
// because the macro adds "QTest::" in front of the last parameter.
|
|
// That is why the following code appears to be a little strange.
|
|
if (failMode == QTest::Abort)
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("wrong row", "This xfail should be ignored", Abort);
|
|
else
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("wrong row", "This xfail should be ignored", Continue);
|
|
QTEST(false, "shouldPass"); // _data skips the passing tests as pointless
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailOnAnyRow() const
|
|
{
|
|
++passed;
|
|
// In a data-driven test, passing an empty first parameter to QEXPECT_FAIL
|
|
// should mean that the failure is expected for all data rows.
|
|
QFETCH(QTest::TestFailMode, failMode);
|
|
// You can't pass a variable as the last parameter of QEXPECT_FAIL,
|
|
// because the macro adds "QTest::" in front of the last parameter.
|
|
// That is why the following code appears to be a little strange.
|
|
if (failMode == QTest::Abort)
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This test should xfail", Abort);
|
|
else
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This test should xfail", Continue);
|
|
QTEST(true, "shouldPass"); // _data skips the passing tests as pointless
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xfailWithoutCheck() const
|
|
{
|
|
++failed;
|
|
qDebug("Should fail (*not* xfail), despite test-case name");
|
|
QTEST(false, "shouldPass"); // _data skips the passing tests as pass/fail is irrelevant
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Abort", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL without any subsequent check is an error",
|
|
Abort);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("Fail Continue", "Calling QEXPECT_FAIL without any subsequent check is an error",
|
|
Continue);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassAbort() const
|
|
{
|
|
++failed;
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This test should xpass", Abort);
|
|
QVERIFY(true);
|
|
|
|
// If we get here the test did not correctly abort on the previous
|
|
// unexpected pass.
|
|
QVERIFY2(false, "This should not be reached");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassAbortSkip() const
|
|
{
|
|
++failed;
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This test should xpass", Abort);
|
|
QVERIFY(true);
|
|
|
|
QSKIP("This should not be reached (and not add to skip-count)");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassAbortXfailContinue() const
|
|
{
|
|
++failed;
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This test should xpass", Abort);
|
|
QVERIFY(true);
|
|
|
|
// If we get here the test did not correctly abort on the previous
|
|
// unexpected pass.
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This should not be reached", Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY2(false, "This should not be reached");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassContinue() const
|
|
{
|
|
++failed;
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This test should xpass", Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY(true);
|
|
qDebug("This should be reached");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassDataDriven_data() const
|
|
{
|
|
QTest::addColumn<bool>("shouldXPass");
|
|
|
|
QTest::newRow("XPass") << true;
|
|
QTest::newRow("Pass") << false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassContinueSkip() const
|
|
{
|
|
++failed; // and *not* ++skipped
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This test should xpass", Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY(true);
|
|
QSKIP("This should be reached but not increment skip-count");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassContinueXfailAbort() const
|
|
{
|
|
++failed;
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This test should xpass", Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY(true);
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("", "This test should xfail but not add to totals", Abort);
|
|
QVERIFY(false);
|
|
QVERIFY2(false, "This should not be reached");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassAbortDataDrivenWithQVerify() const
|
|
{
|
|
QFETCH(bool, shouldXPass);
|
|
if (shouldXPass)
|
|
++failed;
|
|
else
|
|
++passed;
|
|
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("XPass", "This test-row should xpass", Abort);
|
|
QVERIFY(true);
|
|
|
|
// We should only get here if the test wasn't supposed to xpass.
|
|
QVERIFY2(!shouldXPass, "Test failed to Abort on XPASS");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassContinueDataDrivenWithQVerify() const
|
|
{
|
|
QFETCH(bool, shouldXPass);
|
|
if (shouldXPass)
|
|
++failed;
|
|
else
|
|
++passed;
|
|
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("XPass", "This test-row should xpass", Continue);
|
|
QVERIFY(true);
|
|
|
|
qDebug(shouldXPass ? "Test should Continue past XPASS" : "Test should simply PASS");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassAbortDataDrivenWithQCompare() const
|
|
{
|
|
QFETCH(bool, shouldXPass);
|
|
if (shouldXPass)
|
|
++failed;
|
|
else
|
|
++passed;
|
|
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("XPass", "This test should xpass", Abort);
|
|
QCOMPARE(1, 1);
|
|
|
|
// We should only get here if the test wasn't supposed to xpass.
|
|
QVERIFY2(!shouldXPass, "Test failed to Abort on XPASS");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void tst_ExpectFail::xpassContinueDataDrivenWithQCompare() const
|
|
{
|
|
QFETCH(bool, shouldXPass);
|
|
if (shouldXPass)
|
|
++failed;
|
|
else
|
|
++passed;
|
|
|
|
QEXPECT_FAIL("XPass", "This test should xpass", Continue);
|
|
QCOMPARE(1, 1);
|
|
|
|
qDebug(shouldXPass ? "Test should Continue past XPASS" : "Test should simply PASS");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
QTEST_MAIN(tst_ExpectFail)
|
|
#include "tst_expectfail.moc"
|